Notices
Union Talk For macro-level discussion: legislation, national unions, organizing pilot groups, etc.
For airline-specific discussion, use relevant forum above.

Usapa

Old 12-02-2009 | 11:57 AM
  #21  
Jay5150's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: 330 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Godzilla
The Nicalou agreement awarded the top 517 slots on a combined list to the East.
Assuming senior pilots want to fly international on the A 330 its safe to assume it will be East pilots flying these trips.

You seem to be somewhat ignorant of what is actually taking place in the integration.

Not to mention the fact that I would bet that Rome is one of the, if not the most senior trips they have.

Last edited by Jay5150; 12-02-2009 at 11:58 AM. Reason: grammar
Reply
Old 12-02-2009 | 12:03 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Godzilla
You seem to be somewhat ignorant of what is actually taking place in the integration.
Half a sentence wasted.
Reply
Old 12-02-2009 | 02:59 PM
  #23  
duvie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
From: WB Bunkie
Default

Originally Posted by Godzilla
The Nicalou agreement awarded the top 517 slots on a combined list to the East.
Assuming senior pilots want to fly international on the A 330 its safe to assume it will be East pilots flying these trips.

You seem to be somewhat ignorant of what is actually taking place in the integration.
My question to you is how many of those top 517 pilots will retire in the 5 years following 2012? If their list is anything like CAL, AA, UAL or the old NWA (DAL bought out many of their older pilots), there will be a quite large number of baby boomers retiring very soon (often upwards of 20% of the respective seniority lists), at which point all those senior slots will be vacated and filled in by a larger proportion of West guys.

I'm sure I don't have all the facts you do, but I'm also pretty sure that I'm more objective about what I do know based solely on my apathy to the outcome. Both sides of this merger are so emotionally charged that I don't think you could make both sides happy simultaneously, just on principle!
Reply
Old 12-03-2009 | 08:18 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

I absolutely have no dog in this fight. The only conclusions I can draw come from impartial courts and arbitrators (at least they are supposed to be) who seem to continually side with the West guys.
Reply
Old 12-03-2009 | 10:33 AM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 31
From: B777/CA retired
Default

At the risk of wasting more bandwidth (hey, that's what it's there for) I would like to weigh in as well.

The problem with this USAPA release is not that they are trying to hold on to a base. That is understandable, if misguided. The problem is that USAPA has no credibility with half the operation and, most importantly, they have zero credibility with management. When union president Cleary came out to PHX last month for a meeting with the (few) members out here he tried to get a face to face with Doug Parker and Parker refused to meet with him. It is no secret that management will not talk with USAPA unless it is to argue a grievance or through the diciplinary process. No negotiation progress, nothing accomplished in any way, shape or form that would benefit either pilot group.

LAS is being closed as a base. We are not happy about it because it is the result of the draw down of our LAS operation (you're welcome, Allegient and SWA) but we understand the reason. Our costs have gone up 50% since the merger and places we could make money as AWA we can't as US Airways. Our biggest beef with LAS closing is that the company is violating our contract by not having a displacement bid for the base closure. The union is not going to work very hard on a West contract violation, they are going to go protest a management decision that actually makes sense.

Go figure.
Reply
Old 12-03-2009 | 10:38 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Yall remember these are the same geniuses that walked out on a industry standard contract offer back in '07
Only an America West pilot would think a 4 year deal with 3% raise (total) is 'industry standard'.
Reply
Old 12-03-2009 | 10:38 AM
  #27  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cactusmike
The union is not going to work very hard on a West contract violation, they are going to go protest a management decision that actually makes sense.
From this pilot who is on the outside looking in, USAPA appears to have been a failure on every front. That said, aren't you guys coming up on the two year point that you can vote someone else.... anyone else.... in?

Is there a move afoot yet for that?
Reply
Old 12-03-2009 | 10:44 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by duvie
My question to you is how many of those top 517 pilots will retire in the 5 years following 2012?
The thing is that every active AAA pilot on the list also moved up 517 numbers before they got ratioed in by comparable category and status.

Regardless, it really doesn't matter, the process for achieving an integrated list was agreed to by both sides and it was ultimately submitted to a final and binding arbitration process. It's long past time for the east pilots to honor their commitment and accept the list and move on.
Reply
Old 12-03-2009 | 12:41 PM
  #29  
Superdad's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB, no M88, no 7ER, no A320, NEXT!
Default

Sooner or later a federal judge will shove that list down the east pilots throats and there won't be a damn thing they can do about. Hopefully they will learn to move on.
Reply
Old 12-03-2009 | 12:48 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
From this pilot who is on the outside looking in, USAPA appears to have been a failure on every front. That said, aren't you guys coming up on the two year point that you can vote someone else.... anyone else.... in?

Is there a move afoot yet for that?

It is not the union name which makes the union, it is the character of the pilot group. In LCC's case, you have a collection of individuals who feel they came up short and are trying to rewrite arbitration law. Regardless of where you sit on the fairness meter regarding Nicolau, you cannot ignore the fact one side started down this path and sucked the smaller group with it, attempting a cramdown. They got caught by a federal judge, but their character will probably not change, at least not any time soon. That is the essence of the problem.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sandhawk
Major
159
06-30-2009 11:44 AM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
1
02-02-2009 01:26 PM
Jake Wheeler
Union Talk
5
01-16-2009 01:55 PM
cactiboss
Major
86
12-20-2008 11:56 AM
cactiboss
Major
87
10-03-2008 02:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices