Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Union Talk
Just wondering about scabs . . . >

Just wondering about scabs . . .

Search
Notices
Union Talk For macro-level discussion: legislation, national unions, organizing pilot groups, etc.
For airline-specific discussion, use relevant forum above.

Just wondering about scabs . . .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2014, 05:48 AM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by NEDude View Post
Typically the MEC of the striking work force decides what is scabbing and what is not. What would happen if a Teamsters group were to strike (RAH for example) but ALPA decided it was okay to cross their picket line and fly their struck work? I know, it is not very likely, but let's speculate. Would the ALPA pilots be scabs or not?
In some cases, the striking union might approve of other companies carrying the passengers and keeping all the revenue. It could put more pressure on Management if they see that they are losing customers to competitors than if everybody shuts down.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 06-09-2014, 07:16 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,815
Default

Originally Posted by toiletpaper View Post
Ok I stand corrected. But just out of curiosity, for instance, if one of the big cargo carriers went on strike, and the other would come in and fly the struck freight, would that be ok?
If they were generating revenue for the struck carrier, that would be flying struck work.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 06-09-2014, 07:22 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,815
Default

Originally Posted by toiletpaper View Post
So as long as ALPA gives its blessing, one can cross any picket line and not be a scab huh?

I'm getting the impression we have different perspectives on unionism a the definition of scab.
Okay. Let's say a small Beech 1900 operator in ATL goes on strike. Does that shut the entire airport down?
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 06-09-2014, 07:59 AM
  #94  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
If they were generating revenue for the struck carrier, that would be flying struck work.
Fair enough. Now when ALPA pilots crossed the flight engineer's picket line at Eastern, they were certainly generating revenue for the struck carrier. Following your logic above, they are indeed scabs.
toiletpaper is offline  
Old 06-09-2014, 08:05 AM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,815
Default

Originally Posted by toiletpaper View Post
Fair enough. Now when ALPA pilots crossed the flight engineer's picket line at Eastern, they were certainly generating revenue for the struck carrier. Following your logic above, they are indeed scabs.
Not according to ALPA. Let's agree to disagree.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 06-09-2014, 08:55 AM
  #96  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
Not according to ALPA. Let's agree to disagree.
But we can't have it both ways.

If generating revenue for the struck carrier is, by definition, flying struck work, then the people engaged in such, are by definition
scabs indeed. Particularly when employed by the same carrier.

Or are we then to believe, that ALPA is the sole and final arbiter of what constitute strike breaking, and they can alter that definition to fit their convenience at any time ?

By the way, not a dog in this fight. Couldn't care less who is a scab and who is not. Just trying to clarify, what I thought are contradicting statements.

But you're right. Let's agree to disagree. Have a good day Sir.
toiletpaper is offline  
Old 06-09-2014, 11:41 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NEDude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman View Post
In some cases, the striking union might approve of other companies carrying the passengers and keeping all the revenue. It could put more pressure on Management if they see that they are losing customers to competitors than if everybody shuts down.
If American were to go on strike, I do believe United or Delta could come in and take that flying without any issues as they are not doing any flying that would benefit American management.

The issue I am thinking of goes more like this - Skywest finally decides to go union and votes in Teamsters. After drawn out and unsuccessful attempts to negotiate a contact the Skywest pilots, represented by Teamsters, go on strike. ALPA then decides it is okay for ExpressJet (a subsidiary of Skywest represented by ALPA pilots) to go ahead and take over some or all of the Skywest flying in an attempt to weaken the Teamsters union. Skywest management gets the benefit of having another of their subsidiaries take over the flying and thus lessen the pressure of the strike. In the eyes of ALPA the Expressjet pilots would not be scabs, but in the eyes of Teamsters they would be. Who wins out? Are the Expressjet pilots scabs or not?

Again, an unlikely scenario, but interesting to ponder.
NEDude is offline  
Old 06-10-2014, 10:02 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airbum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 652
Default

Originally Posted by toiletpaper View Post
Fair enough. Now when ALPA pilots crossed the flight engineer's picket line at Eastern, they were certainly generating revenue for the struck carrier. Following your logic above, they are indeed scabs.
I haven't read all of this thread so forgive me if I am repeating what others have said.

TP, It would seem to me that if ALPA pilots performed the job of a Flight engineer for Eastern then that would be doing struck work. If the ALPA Eastern pilot performed a job ( like being a pilot not a flight engineer ) then that would not be performing struck work.

Haven't there been times when say the Flight Attendants went on strike but the pilots did not. The pilots flying the plane did not scab unless they became Flight Attendants.

Some unions go so far as to not cross other union's legal picket lines. This is to show support and not necessarily out of concern for becoming a scab.
Airbum is offline  
Old 06-10-2014, 10:07 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by NEDude View Post
If American were to go on strike, I do believe United or Delta could come in and take that flying without any issues as they are not doing any flying that would benefit American management.

The issue I am thinking of goes more like this - Skywest finally decides to go union and votes in Teamsters. After drawn out and unsuccessful attempts to negotiate a contact the Skywest pilots, represented by Teamsters, go on strike. ALPA then decides it is okay for ExpressJet (a subsidiary of Skywest represented by ALPA pilots) to go ahead and take over some or all of the Skywest flying in an attempt to weaken the Teamsters union. Skywest management gets the benefit of having another of their subsidiaries take over the flying and thus lessen the pressure of the strike. In the eyes of ALPA the Expressjet pilots would not be scabs, but in the eyes of Teamsters they would be. Who wins out? Are the Expressjet pilots scabs or not?

Again, an unlikely scenario, but interesting to ponder.
Unlikely since none of the airlines have excess aircraft to just come in and take the others flying.

That being said unless we would have a national shut down of service a simple strike by one or the others will not get much done.
syd111 is offline  
Old 06-10-2014, 10:22 AM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
B727DRVR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Standing in front of the tank with a shopping bag
Posts: 918
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by RomeoJulietLima View Post
Hmm, my current profession does not allow unions and my last career discouraged it. In my opinion no, no one should be discrimated against. I have kids come up to me everyday talking about how life is in their opinion. It is different in their life. I have not lived their life but it is different. I have always been a little conservative. I, once had a nurse tell me that the adults of their 20's are dealing with 9/11 fallout. That actually may be true! You know they actually have to deal with our economy. Actually how do they deal with our economy, or our health care? Just a question?
Hey RJL,

Respectfully, I really don't understand what you are questioning... If you cross a picket line and fly equipment, callsign, or flight number for an airline that has a striking pilot group, you are without question, a scab. If your country is invaded and you help or assist the enemy, then you are a collaborator or even a traitor.

Scabbing has nothing to do with Christianity, Judiasm, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, etc, or even athiesm. You have good and scumbag members of all these religions... Scabbing comes from selfishness and a "me first, screw everbody else" mentality.

In nearly every case (aside from the above mentioned stupidity from green card pilots who didn't know better), someone who scabs intends to get ahead of another by "pushing the striker and their family out of the lifeboat" so that the scab may benefit, regardless of the cost to the worker making a stand. This isn't even really a conservative or liberal issue, because Trade Unionism IS the American Way and the Right to organize is something that most American workers have... Rush, Hannity, O'Reily are ALL union members. CEO's have one of the most powerful unions of all, their B.O.D. Lawyers have the BAR, Doctors have the AMA. And of course, politicians who vote in pay raises for themselves and get the best health care, but want NO minimum wage and fight health care for those they represent, have the best union of all.. Themselves. And the Airlines themselves even have their own union, Airlines for America (formerly the Air Transport Association, or ATA), which fights anything, including safety, that affects their bottom line.

What you got from the AMERICAN labor union movement is the much beloved: end of indentured servitude, end of forced child labor, paid vacation, paid sick time, workplace safety, 40 hour work week, the American Middle Class, and too many other things to mention. Remember, prior to trade unions, America was a third world Bangladesh-like low cost labor country with ridiculous disparity between the classes. Our Forefathers fought the Robber Barrons, who owned 99% of the Nations wealth to help create the American Middle class. They, in turn with the GI Bill, helped educate millions and paid for their children's educations with good-paying union jobs. How about FMLA? Guess who fought for that? Certainly no the scabs... You're welcome....

What pilot union representation has gotten you is the safest aviation industry in the world. Pilot unions fought for our safety and paid for it with their blood. Most of the regulations we have were again, paid for with blood. Like the NASA form? Like TCASII? The airlines cost benefit analysts determined that it was too expensive, and that it would be better for the bottom line to just pay the claims after the mid-air collision. FFDO, CRM, fixed distance markers, standard airport markings, lightings, etc., ARTCC, TAWS, GPWS, standard instrument panels, Terminal Doppler radar, cockpit wx radar, etc. are some of the many things that pilot unions fought for years to get. You are safer, not because of the good wills of the Robber Barrons or various airline management teams over the years, but because of the many pilot unions that fought to make things safer DESPITE THE COST. Again, you're welcome.

Yes, we are all dealing with the "new" economy of post September 11, but that doesn't allow us to scab for an airline and push wages and working conditions down. That is being a scab, or better yet a traitor to ones profession.
B727DRVR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DazednConfused
Flight Schools and Training
8
08-06-2022 08:06 AM
CH-47Driver
Flight Schools and Training
139
03-22-2007 09:44 AM
xjtr
Regional
1
03-02-2007 02:25 PM
ShyGuy
Regional
1
02-28-2007 07:43 PM
everett_cessna_pilot
Flight Schools and Training
8
07-30-2005 02:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices