Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Union Talk (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/union-talk/)
-   -   National Free Ride legislation (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/union-talk/99745-national-free-ride-legislation.html)

Whoopjuice 01-31-2017 03:05 PM

National Free Ride legislation
 
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/gop-introduces-national-right-to-work-legislation/article/2613428

GogglesPisano 01-31-2017 03:57 PM

"Right to Work (for Less.)"

NMuir 01-31-2017 05:47 PM

Good. The federal government has no authority to deal with labor issues, except for immigration.

dwightkschrute 01-31-2017 07:30 PM

Oh great, let's work for peanuts and let management crap all over us more than they already do. The unions should be better but they're better than not having one.

GogglesPisano 02-01-2017 04:53 AM


Originally Posted by NMuir (Post 2292203)
Good. The federal government has no authority to deal with labor issues, except for immigration.

Agreed. How about we let the free market work unencumbered? And allow unions and companies to sign -- and abide by -- contracts without government interference?

While we're at it I'd like free insurance and someone to negotiate my next raise -- without having to pay them.

DALFA 02-01-2017 03:43 PM

So basically...a union has to bargain for you and represent you if you're called in by a manager but you're not required to pay anything for those services.

Of course they throw in key words like "freedom" and "choice" to make it sound like it's an amazing thing.

It's purpose has nothing to do with freedom, and it has everything to do with getting rid of those pesky unions that negotiate better wages & benefits.

NMuir 02-01-2017 04:11 PM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 2292382)
Agreed. How about we let the free market work unencumbered? And allow unions and companies to sign -- and abide by -- contracts without government interference?

Government's job is to enforce contracts, so yeah sure sounds good to me.

NMuir 02-01-2017 04:12 PM


Originally Posted by DALFA (Post 2292787)
So basically...a union has to bargain for you and represent you if you're called in by a manager but you're not required to pay anything for those services.

Maybe you don't want their services?




Originally Posted by DALFA (Post 2292787)
It's purpose has nothing to do with freedom, and it has everything to do with getting rid of those pesky unions that negotiate better wages & benefits.

First off, federal labor laws are unconstitutional, which is the issue at stake here.

Secondly, why should someone be forced to pay dues to someone just to work? That is the very definition of theft.

GogglesPisano 02-01-2017 05:29 PM


Originally Posted by NMuir (Post 2292809)
Maybe you don't want their services?



First off, federal labor laws are unconstitutional, which is the issue at stake here.

Secondly, why should someone be forced to pay dues to someone just to work? That is the very definition of theft.

You realize this would simply allow a race to the bottom? Further eviscerating what's left of the middle class? A union negotiates a certain level of compensation and work rules, then someone comes in off the street (let's call him a "rugged individualist") and wants a job without having to pay (prolly less than 1%) dues. He doesn't want representation because he believes in freedommm!!!.

Will the wages/work rules he negotiates be ...
(a) higher
(b) the same
(c) lower

If (c) then you can see where this leads. Bangledesh here we come.

NMuir 02-01-2017 05:52 PM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 2292860)
You realize this would simply allow a race to the bottom? Further eviscerating what's left of the middle class? A union negotiates a certain level of compensation and work rules, then someone comes in off the street (let's call him a "rugged individualist") and wants a job without having to pay (prolly less than 1%) dues. He doesn't want representation because he believes in freedommm!!!.

Will the wages/work rules he negotiates be ...
(a) higher
(b) the same
(c) lower

If (c) then you can see where this leads. Bangledesh here we come.

You fail to see the other side of the equation... many business don't want bottom feeder employees, so they are willing to pay more for higher quality. Put another way, not everyone buys on price alone. Some people will buy a BMW, while others will buy a Ford. There are at least two sides to every market.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:38 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands