National Free Ride legislation
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/gop-introduces-national-right-to-work-legislation/article/2613428
|
"Right to Work (for Less.)"
|
Good. The federal government has no authority to deal with labor issues, except for immigration.
|
Oh great, let's work for peanuts and let management crap all over us more than they already do. The unions should be better but they're better than not having one.
|
Originally Posted by NMuir
(Post 2292203)
Good. The federal government has no authority to deal with labor issues, except for immigration.
While we're at it I'd like free insurance and someone to negotiate my next raise -- without having to pay them. |
So basically...a union has to bargain for you and represent you if you're called in by a manager but you're not required to pay anything for those services.
Of course they throw in key words like "freedom" and "choice" to make it sound like it's an amazing thing. It's purpose has nothing to do with freedom, and it has everything to do with getting rid of those pesky unions that negotiate better wages & benefits. |
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 2292382)
Agreed. How about we let the free market work unencumbered? And allow unions and companies to sign -- and abide by -- contracts without government interference?
|
Originally Posted by DALFA
(Post 2292787)
So basically...a union has to bargain for you and represent you if you're called in by a manager but you're not required to pay anything for those services.
Originally Posted by DALFA
(Post 2292787)
It's purpose has nothing to do with freedom, and it has everything to do with getting rid of those pesky unions that negotiate better wages & benefits.
Secondly, why should someone be forced to pay dues to someone just to work? That is the very definition of theft. |
Originally Posted by NMuir
(Post 2292809)
Maybe you don't want their services?
First off, federal labor laws are unconstitutional, which is the issue at stake here. Secondly, why should someone be forced to pay dues to someone just to work? That is the very definition of theft. Will the wages/work rules he negotiates be ... (a) higher (b) the same (c) lower If (c) then you can see where this leads. Bangledesh here we come. |
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 2292860)
You realize this would simply allow a race to the bottom? Further eviscerating what's left of the middle class? A union negotiates a certain level of compensation and work rules, then someone comes in off the street (let's call him a "rugged individualist") and wants a job without having to pay (prolly less than 1%) dues. He doesn't want representation because he believes in freedommm!!!.
Will the wages/work rules he negotiates be ... (a) higher (b) the same (c) lower If (c) then you can see where this leads. Bangledesh here we come. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:38 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands