Commerce Clause. It has become the Swiss Army Knife of Congress. :rolleyes:

Sad, but true.... even though the Commerce Clause is actually restrictive, not expansive.

Cite your source?

You need to go back and read the law.

So in a "Right to Work (for less)" scenario if a guy walks into FedEx and says, "Hey, I'm a "rugged individualist. I'd like to work for 75% of what your pilots covered under the CBA are working for-- with no job protections."

Do you think:
(a) They'd hire him.
(b) They'd like to hire more guys like him and fewer under a CBA.
(b) It would have any effect on the negotiations for the rest of the pilot group.

If you're a pilot, you can see where this whole thing leads.

And we're still waiting to hear about how freeloaders should be dealt with.

It would depend on the circumstances, his qualifications, and what the company needs/wants.

So if he was qualified he could make 25% less in lieu of 2% union dues? Sweet deal!!

I'd wager Harrison & Ford.......

I have a hard time believing he believes what he writes. My guess is he's interning at Cato.

Most major pilots under 45 are new hires, they don't make s--t.