Search
Notices

From the AA Forum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2022, 06:22 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chowdah's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 225
Default

I suppose it is possible that some people are gambling on future raises when they apply to be an LCA or PI, but I would guess that the majority simply wanted to do the job. Historically, it’s been a pretty sought after position and if you enjoy working with, mentoring or helping people, it’s very fulfilling. That said, doing OE every single trip in a 737 or being locked in a dark box for four hours a day, correcting the same errors over and over, is a little less glamorous than when one was on the outside looking in.

Given what American purportedly is offering in their new TA, if we don’t get a substantial increase in compensation for these positions, I think a lot of the more senior/seasoned folks will finally pull the trigger on their widebody captain beds, or solid line-holding NB Denver captain bid.

Personally, I think the PI‘s are a little more likely to stay… The lifestyle difference between working at TK and taking a junior captain bid is very different. If one appeals to you, the other one probably would not. But as a more senior check airman, the quality of life increase from doing OE on a guppy 16 days a month, to flying even the more Junior widebody captain lines, is a fairly obvious increase in QOL.
Chowdah is offline  
Old 10-28-2022, 08:17 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 527
Default

Originally Posted by Chowdah View Post
I suppose it is possible that some people are gambling on future raises when they apply to be an LCA or PI, but I would guess that the majority simply wanted to do the job. Historically, it’s been a pretty sought after position and if you enjoy working with, mentoring or helping people, it’s very fulfilling. That said, doing OE every single trip in a 737 or being locked in a dark box for four hours a day, correcting the same errors over and over, is a little less glamorous than when one was on the outside looking in.

Given what American purportedly is offering in their new TA, if we don’t get a substantial increase in compensation for these positions, I think a lot of the more senior/seasoned folks will finally pull the trigger on their widebody captain beds, or solid line-holding NB Denver captain bid.

Personally, I think the PI‘s are a little more likely to stay… The lifestyle difference between working at TK and taking a junior captain bid is very different. If one appeals to you, the other one probably would not. But as a more senior check airman, the quality of life increase from doing OE on a guppy 16 days a month, to flying even the more Junior widebody captain lines, is a fairly obvious increase in QOL.
PI hasn't been a desired job by many for years.
You say senior check airmen but majority are quite junior now.
GPullR is offline  
Old 10-28-2022, 09:24 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear View Post
This is an excellent example of the sunk cost fallacy. We’ve already wasted 3 years for this NC to utterly fail & brand it as a success. The solution then is to give them more time to finish the job? Those 3 years are gone either way. Better to mark them up to a loss than to waste another 3 making the same mistake.

Voting to approve that nonsense then “rep-splaining” to me why I don’t want my wages to keep up with inflation was enough evidence to me that they are not up to the task. Is the road smooth ahead? No. Does that mean we necessarily stick with the status quo? Also no.

These guys don’t need to stick around to finish the job. They need to get out of the way so someone else can do it right.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ALL OF THIS.

Initially I did get a bit emotional after reading through the redline Tumi TA and saying 'WTF' more times than I could count. Then logic, reason, and critical thinking kicked in and emotion was put in check.

Yes, we were done wrong by the NC and MEC. That needs to be fixed...no sense in trusting those who already screwed up to 'fix' what was offered that only gets us back to what's on the books already.

Do I think we need to hold out for 50% and reinstatement of a defined pension plan? Absolutely not. It's not reasonable to think we're going to make that kind of jump from where we are.

However, we can and will do better than the Tumi TA. To think that the individuals who already wasted so much time and tried to sell us cow pie in the end game would then somehow wind up working on behalf of the pilots they were supposed to be representing in the first place is foolhardy.

To the individuals who keep saying we can't discount the time factor of money, you are correct...to a point. If the money we eventually get is completely offset by the work rules they were going to implement and quality of life suffers dramatically (I believe it would have with the reserve & reassignment crap in thr Tumi TA), NO amount of money now would have made up for the pain of concessionary work rules going forward.

Last thought....I still can't wrap my head around an MEC/NC who thought reducing 1st day reserve by 4 hours would be 'schedule with safety.' Colgan Air flight 3407 (and many others) ring a bell?
That Guy 74 is offline  
Old 10-28-2022, 09:35 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chowdah's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 225
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR View Post
PI hasn't been a desired job by many for years.
You say senior check airmen but majority are quite junior now.
I disagree with both statements. If you have access to the LCA roster, take a look, if you don’t, broad strokes: 90% can hold a line and more than half are top 60% in BES conservatively. So while there are quite a few new bodies doing LCA work in the 60-75% BES range, the majority could chase more money/QOL on the 756 or wide body. So ultimately when I say senior, I don’t mean most are sub 3,000 seniority, but it’s not as junior as some would have you believe.

As far as the PI gig, most of the reasonable chatter I hear is about missing out on PPU, but our bandaid approach to open flying is not guaranteed indefinitely. Their pay rate/hour combo puts them squarely around NB CA reserve. For the 2 year PIs, if you would rather sit reserve over the weekends 18 days a month, vs be home every night and most holidays… I’m not sure why you’d take the PI gig in the first place.
Chowdah is offline  
Old 10-28-2022, 10:12 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 527
Default

Originally Posted by Chowdah View Post
I disagree with both statements. If you have access to the LCA roster, take a look, if you don’t, broad strokes: 90% can hold a line and more than half are top 60% in BES conservatively. So while there are quite a few new bodies doing LCA work in the 60-75% BES range, the majority could chase more money/QOL on the 756 or wide body. So ultimately when I say senior, I don’t mean most are sub 3,000 seniority, but it’s not as junior as some would have you believe.

As far as the PI gig, most of the reasonable chatter I hear is about missing out on PPU, but our bandaid approach to open flying is not guaranteed indefinitely. Their pay rate/hour combo puts them squarely around NB CA reserve. For the 2 year PIs, if you would rather sit reserve over the weekends 18 days a month, vs be home every night and most holidays… I’m not sure why you’d take the PI gig in the first place.
If they're so desired please tell me why there are/were postings for openings for the last year non stop.
In order to make any more money on the 75/6 you have to be top 3000 or you will never see the 764 pay rate. Others pay the same.
Ip is always the same . During bad times everybody wants to hide out there. When times are good nobody wants to be there.
GPullR is offline  
Old 10-28-2022, 10:33 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27 View Post

Seems you're willing to sign off on a deal just to get a deal. Those who brought us this TA needed to be replaced. I wasn't "angry" as much as I was upset that they let me and the pilot group down.
These days, seems anonymous people like to throw certain words around like - "Angry", "Depressed", "Relic", "Crazy".
Originally Posted by Zoomie View Post
Your argument is that there's no guarantee new reps will do better.
Both of you should run for an MEC positions. You have hyperbole, misplaced inference, and the ability to blather on without actually saying anything down!

If you read my post, I said what I meant. To spell it out for you:

A new MEC, in order to truly represent “the will of the pilots”, will have to start from square one. Starting from square one will take significantly more time than tweaking TA1.

Otherwise, aren’t they carrying on with the work of the failed MEC that you despise?

We’ll soon see if TA2 will be tweaked enough to hit 50.1% I’m certain that everyone is paying attention now.
awax is offline  
Old 10-28-2022, 12:18 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,341
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
A new MEC, in order to truly represent “the will of the pilots”, will have to start from square one. Starting from square one will take significantly more time than tweaking TA1.
Did you read TUMI? We’re at square zero.

Again, sunk cost fallacy. You may feel you don’t have enough to time to change representatives. After 3 years & TUMI, I feel I don’t have another minute to waste on the current ones.
hummingbear is offline  
Old 10-28-2022, 12:48 PM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2022
Posts: 25
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
Both of you should run for an MEC positions. You have hyperbole, misplaced inference, and the ability to blather on without actually saying anything down!

If you read my post, I said what I meant. To spell it out for you:

A new MEC, in order to truly represent “the will of the pilots”, will have to start from square one. Starting from square one will take significantly more time than tweaking TA1.

Otherwise, aren’t they carrying on with the work of the failed MEC that you despise?

We’ll soon see if TA2 will be tweaked enough to hit 50.1% I’m certain that everyone is paying attention now.
We’ll soon see TA2? Uh, no we won’t. There is no TA2. Did you not read the comms from both the union and management? Not to mention there’s a slim possibility that TA1 could still pass.
PilotsAreDumb is offline  
Old 10-28-2022, 12:59 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 398
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
We’ll soon see if TA2 will be tweaked enough to hit 50.1% I’m certain that everyone is paying attention now.
Soon? Check your email...
Random Task is offline  
Old 10-28-2022, 04:57 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by Random Task View Post
Soon? Check your email...
AA BOD will meet to review their TA on 10/31. What do you think happens after those numbers are public?
awax is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyinIsIt
Major
0
11-22-2014 09:59 AM
pilot64golfer
United
89
07-07-2014 03:24 PM
zyttocs
Hangar Talk
11
09-16-2013 10:00 AM
oldmako
United
6
11-27-2012 04:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices