GUM isn't a siberian labor camp but it's not a base like any other.
Commuting 7,000 miles against your will is fundamentally different than 700. |
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
(Post 3786353)
Commuting 7,000 miles against your will is fundamentally different than 700.
|
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
(Post 3786353)
GUM isn't a siberian labor camp but it's not a base like any other.
Commuting 7,000 miles against your will is fundamentally different than 700. And heck, there hasn't even been active hostilities there since 1952 when the last Japanese soldier discovered the war was over although he wasn't actually captured for another couple decades... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoichi_Yokoi Of course, the UXO risk persists... https://www.usace.army.mil/Portals/2.../Guam_MMRP.pdf |
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
(Post 3786353)
GUM isn't a siberian labor camp but it's not a base like any other.
Commuting 7,000 miles against your will is fundamentally different than 700. |
Originally Posted by TFAYD
(Post 3786225)
it may become a big deal if vacancy bids dry up. perfect storm of MAX drama and FAA drama is brewing …. Nothing indicates that this is a thing - at least not yet.
The only way vacancy bids stop is if passenger demand falls off. And there's no sign of that happening. But you can find plenty of pilots who will cry wolf about 'the music stopping' over and over again. Eventually they are right. Look at the passenger numbers: https://www.tsa.gov/travel/passenger-volumes It's pretty much up 10% from 2023. United has to grow in order to keep up with demand. If United stops growing, all airline ticket prices (not just United) will increase considerably in order to suppress demand growth. On the same note, we need Boeing to keep building those POS guppies in order to keep up with demand. The FAA can try to stop United growth and Boeing from building aircraft, but the public blowback will be untenable. |
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3786341)
I think you’re reading too much into the verbiage. For the sake of conversation, “forced” just means “involuntary”- meaning it was that individual’s only option. (Other than “apply somewhere else or quit”.) No one is saying involuntary awards are wrong or unfair- we understand how seniority works. It’s just an interesting reference point to know which seats are going involuntary at a given time. If you can remove the emotion you seem to attach to the word “forced” this conversation might make a lot more sense to you.
|
Originally Posted by MindFuzz
(Post 3786389)
Do that many people really commute? It sounds like an awesome excuse to go live the island life for a year or two. I've been to Guam numerous times and I would consider it based on the unique experience it offers.
|
Originally Posted by JTwift
(Post 3786436)
Ive seen more than one class drop paper with the word “forced” on it recently. I’ve been watching them the past several years, and it had never shown up until the contract was signed. I think people are equating “forced” Captain spots with “I don’t like this, so it’s forced” so they then annotate it for some reason. It seems to be a recent thing, and I’m not sure the reason for even putting it on there.
|
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3786391)
This is a temporary pause. That's it.
The only way vacancy bids stop is if passenger demand falls off. And there's no sign of that happening. But you can find plenty of pilots who will cry wolf about 'the music stopping' over and over again. Eventually they are right. Look at the passenger numbers: https://www.tsa.gov/travel/passenger-volumes It's pretty much up 10% from 2023. United has to grow in order to keep up with demand. If United stops growing, all airline ticket prices (not just United) will increase considerably in order to suppress demand growth. On the same note, we need Boeing to keep building those POS guppies in order to keep up with demand. The FAA can try to stop United growth and Boeing from building aircraft, but the public blowback will be untenable. Your assumption that demand is unlimited and infinite is pretty gullible. Financing airplanes when pax demand is high is easy. When you have too many assets not so much. Bastian is a CEO who really gets this, preaches optimistic but measured, strategic growth. Not growth for the sake of growth, highly leveraging the assets before acquiring new ones. Unlike drag queen CEO, which thankfully is being somewhat impeded by Boeing (he’ll thank them later). |
Long time reader, first time poster. Since these posts seem to get off track, here is my attempt to get back on topic. I'm looking to see if anyone who received CJO's early-mid March have recieved class dates yet or might have info on when to expect them? I beleive no classes May/June, but i'm just trying to set my own expectations for planning. I received a CJO on 23 March, and still waiting on the pee test info. Thanks for the help!
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:12 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands