Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
What United Has To Do To Increase Profits >

What United Has To Do To Increase Profits

Search
Notices

What United Has To Do To Increase Profits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2018, 04:58 AM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default Endemic

United's problems are far more endemic than the Bloomberg article suggests.

Meet the new United, same as the old United.
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 01-30-2018, 05:38 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dragon7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Pressing On
Posts: 524
Default

Read and saw a few things this weekend.

First, E175 taking off from SFO in front of me going to OKC. Scope is life.

Second reading some research that touched on things from other sources and observations. Legacy UAL has a lot of bloated overhead costs. Legacy Cal Management was willing to shrink to profitability after merger and gave away market share, when we already are not dominant in any one market. New United is most seasonal of any airline.

Happy to see Management going against Wall Street desires for us to limit capacity.

And encourage them to buy some 100 seat jets. Because Scope is a nonstarter for this 50+ year old ex mil guy.
Dragon7 is offline  
Old 01-30-2018, 06:07 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CLazarus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: 777FO
Posts: 703
Default

Originally Posted by Skyw View Post
I'll bet millions that Songpilot is not me.
Hmmmm, go reread my post. I never said you were.


Originally Posted by Skyw View Post
The problem is you are not as smart as you think you are. Grow up and act like professionals that you pretend to be.
Word.
CLazarus is offline  
Old 01-30-2018, 06:40 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,125
Default

Originally Posted by Skyw View Post
Ok. United is the best of the best! Profits will soar in the coming years as United takes out the competition! United can do no wrong! There, now I won't be banned. We should ban everyone that doesn't have the same opinion. I'm a believer now!
If you would read and think critically you would see there is a fair amount of criticism toward this management and plan. However most of us have cautious optimism that the plan will work. We all see what Kirby is saying and we are all willing to work to make United successful however we are not willing to give on scope so well see what Kirby has to offer. If Kirby won't budge on anything but less scope and more CPA flying then his plan will fail and so will United. The pilots are done giving away jobs to other airlines.

Instead of being argumentative and wanting to bet money on everything how about you try to make your self smarter so you can be apart of a constructive conversation instead of just an antagonist. Not all of your points are bad points but if someone disagrees don't just try and shove the point down their throat and get upset when people call you out for what you are, an uneducated poster with talking points.
MasterOfPuppets is online now  
Old 01-30-2018, 06:49 AM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
BigDukeSix's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 83
Default

Maybe we can get inventive on scope, test the “we need feeders” line. Lets start with no regional flights to or from a Class B airport unless it is a United hub.
BigDukeSix is offline  
Old 01-30-2018, 07:17 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 694
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets View Post
If you would read and think critically you would see there is a fair amount of criticism toward this management and plan...
Politely written, but I think you give him too much credit. In fact, I'd bet you millions he's 100% trolling lol
Chuck D is offline  
Old 01-30-2018, 10:08 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 559
Default

Originally Posted by BigDukeSix View Post
Maybe we can get inventive on scope, test the “we need feeders” line. Lets start with no regional flights to or from a Class B airport unless it is a United hub.
I like that. Or, in between two Class B airports.

Another possibility is no or limited outsourced flying in high frequency markets.
da42pilot is offline  
Old 01-30-2018, 10:32 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 735
Default

Originally Posted by Dragon7 View Post
Read and saw a few things this weekend.

First, E175 taking off from SFO in front of me going to OKC. Scope is life.

Second reading some research that touched on things from other sources and observations. Legacy UAL has a lot of bloated overhead costs. Legacy Cal Management was willing to shrink to profitability after merger and gave away market share, when we already are not dominant in any one market. New United is most seasonal of any airline.

Happy to see Management going against Wall Street desires for us to limit capacity.

And encourage them to buy some 100 seat jets. Because Scope is a nonstarter for this 50+ year old ex mil guy.
I just posted this on the vacancy bid thread.


That being said we finally have a management team that wants to run an airline and exploit the best hubs and overall route network in the business.

I’ve posted this before and I don’t have the exact numbers in front of me. I believe we have approximately 220 & 185 less mainline narrowbody vs. AA and DAL, however our Widebody flying is significantly bigger then both.

I’m going to make a bold prediction that on our new contract we are going to be the first Legacy to fly 70/76 seater. I also believe we will buy 100 seaters.

My sources tell me both the company and union are motivated to get a deal completed this year. I don’t see the union agreeing to scope concessions. The company wants and needs to grow and wants more 76 seaters. Sure they could order SNB but that would take beyond 2020 to take delivery and grow more 70/76 seaters allowed by Scope choke. They wouldn’t be able to make the recently reported growth targets. The only way to do this is by having mainline fly 70/76 seaters and a mix of new SNB.
Boeing Aviator is offline  
Old 01-30-2018, 10:55 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

There is one problem that I foresee with your sanguine view of what's coming. Our numbers stink relative to our peers. I imagine there is significant pressure on our management team to fix this and of course, costs will always be the first thing attacked. We are costs.

I hope you're right and they take the airline in a new direction with us flying the larger next-gen RJ's (and whatever else is on the horizon). But as always, I remain skeptronic. Time will tell.
oldmako is offline  
Old 01-30-2018, 11:16 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 300
Default

Why is there no distance limit on scope outsourcing? So-called "regionals" routinely fly 1500+ miles. This isn't merely "connecting passengers into the hub." It has literally replaced mainline flying.

Any further scope concessions would further erode the career.
3EngineTaxi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
EWRflyr
United
44
04-26-2014 05:07 AM
Flyguppy
United
17
04-24-2014 06:39 AM
thor2j
United
78
04-13-2013 06:59 AM
LeeMat
United
241
04-22-2012 07:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices