![]() |
JFK???
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/united-seeks-return-to-new-york-jfk-449086/
|
Originally Posted by flightmedic01
(Post 2606154)
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/united-seeks-return-to-new-york-jfk-449086/
|
JFK???
United gets jetblue
Delta gets Alaska Spirit gets frontier [emoji848] Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
A good example of spinning nothing into something. The headline makes it sound like we are actively ‘seeking’ to get back into JFK, but Kirby directly says we don’t have a “feasible organic solution” for doing so. Of course, then the article implies that we might be trying to get in via an “inorganic” acquisition.
I actually think the JFK pullout might have been ultimately a good thing (aside from the initial buffoonery of essentially trading our slots away for nothing). Yeah, perhaps we gave up on a lot of premium customers, but the CO did say at the time we’d lost money on the route for years. There was an awful lot of competition there on JFK - LAX/SFO premium transcons with JB/DAL/AA. Not much competition on them though for us out of EWR, and there are plenty of well-off NJ residents who don’t want to go to all the way JFK even if it means paying a higher fare. |
Originally Posted by CLazarus
(Post 2606247)
A good example of spinning nothing into something. The headline makes it sound like we are actively ‘seeking’ to get back into JFK, but Kirby directly says we don’t have a “feasible organic solution” for doing so. Of course, then the article implies that we might be trying to get in via an “inorganic” acquisition.
|
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 2606252)
Don't forget, he was also patting himself on the back at what a good job he did of running UCH OUT of JFK when he was at AAG.
Smisek seemed to make a habit out of pulling out of any market there was competition on (shrinking to profitability). |
Originally Posted by CLazarus
(Post 2606247)
I actually think the JFK pullout might have been ultimately a good thing (aside from the initial buffoonery of essentially trading our slots away for nothing). Yeah, perhaps we gave up on a lot of premium customers, but the CO did say at the time we’d lost money on the route for years. There was an awful lot of competition there on JFK - LAX/SFO premium transcons with JB/DAL/AA. Not much competition on them though for us out of EWR, and there are plenty of well-off NJ residents who don’t want to go to all the way JFK even if it means paying a higher fare.
|
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 2606252)
Don't forget, he was also patting himself on the back at what a good job he did of running UCH OUT of JFK when he was at AAG.
|
Originally Posted by webecheck
(Post 2606334)
As he should. Smart business strategist. At least now we have people willing to compete as long as we get scope relief
|
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 2606383)
Fixed it for you.
Besides, I’m happy with my QoL and my contract. Scope is a non issue imo because they don’t have enough ammo to use on pay rates to convince me, or anyone I’ve talked to, that it’s worth it. To think the entire UAL increased profitability gameplan rests on us giving scope relief means our current mgmt won’t be in place for long. Wall Street won’t accept that excuse. Sometimes they are aligned with our interests. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:51 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands