This just about covers posting of nude pics
08-11-2018, 01:38 PM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 313
The guy ended up in jail for stalking.
She's probably going to take us to the cleaners because it appears she made multiple complaints that she was being sexually harassed and we didn't take action against the guy.
That his misconduct rose to the level where he was incarcerated means she's probably got a pretty good civil case against us. We'll settle quickly (Monday morning after this NYT story) to quash the adverse publicity.
She's probably going to take us to the cleaners because it appears she made multiple complaints that she was being sexually harassed and we didn't take action against the guy.
That his misconduct rose to the level where he was incarcerated means she's probably got a pretty good civil case against us. We'll settle quickly (Monday morning after this NYT story) to quash the adverse publicity.
08-11-2018, 01:58 PM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,982
Originally Posted by Setopbug
The guy ended up in jail for stalking.
She's probably going to take us to the cleaners because it appears she made multiple complaints that she was being sexually harassed and we didn't take action against the guy.
That his misconduct rose to the level where he was incarcerated means she's probably got a pretty good civil case against us. We'll settle quickly (Monday morning after this NYT story) to quash the adverse publicity.
She's probably going to take us to the cleaners because it appears she made multiple complaints that she was being sexually harassed and we didn't take action against the guy.
That his misconduct rose to the level where he was incarcerated means she's probably got a pretty good civil case against us. We'll settle quickly (Monday morning after this NYT story) to quash the adverse publicity.
What is this “WE” and “US” you keep saying? Pilots fly the planes. Pilots don’t police the employees.
08-11-2018, 02:09 PM
#13
Banned
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
What is this “WE” and “US” you keep saying? Pilots fly the planes. Pilots don’t police the employees.
08-11-2018, 02:18 PM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,982
Originally Posted by BMEP100
Exactly right. Except her complaint is that this pilot stalked an employee...$$$$$ca ching
While we’re at it...why does *(a scab)* still fly airplanes?
Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 08-11-2018 at 03:10 PM. Reason: Privacy/Security
08-11-2018, 04:19 PM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 313
Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
What is this “WE” and “US” you keep saying? Pilots fly the planes. Pilots don’t police the employees.
But I'm happy to say it your way: United Airlines is going to pay big time because one of their employee's conduct was so bad he ended up in jail. Yet multiple investigations prior to his trail failed to uncover and act on his misconduct. That's called negligence. Add to it, the adverse publicity involved for the airline given that the former employee is a convicted dirtbag and the alleged misbehavior was sexual in nature?
United Airlines is going to settle immediately and for a whole lot of money.
Happy now?
08-11-2018, 04:39 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,165
Was she under duress when the photos were taken?
I'm not sure how much merit there is to the case. If there was merit, she'd have an ambulance chasing lawyer doing it on contingency. Instead, she's got EEOC lawyers.
I suspect this will be dismissed rather quickly on the basis of lack of merit.
I'm not sure how much merit there is to the case. If there was merit, she'd have an ambulance chasing lawyer doing it on contingency. Instead, she's got EEOC lawyers.
I suspect this will be dismissed rather quickly on the basis of lack of merit.
08-11-2018, 05:52 PM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,826
Originally Posted by Setopbug
The guy ended up in jail for stalking.
She's probably going to take us to the cleaners because it appears she made multiple complaints that she was being sexually harassed and we didn't take action against the guy.
That his misconduct rose to the level where he was incarcerated means she's probably got a pretty good civil case against us. We'll settle quickly (Monday morning after this NYT story) to quash the adverse publicity.
She's probably going to take us to the cleaners because it appears she made multiple complaints that she was being sexually harassed and we didn't take action against the guy.
That his misconduct rose to the level where he was incarcerated means she's probably got a pretty good civil case against us. We'll settle quickly (Monday morning after this NYT story) to quash the adverse publicity.
Last edited by GogglesPisano; 08-11-2018 at 06:16 PM.
08-11-2018, 06:02 PM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Airbus 320 Captain
Posts: 481
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
Again: What does it have to do with their employer? Because they net at work? He drove a Honda home after he took the photos — should Honda be liable?
And he used a Nikon camera, so there's another company to sue.
.........
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
