UAL to remove seats from RJs
05-21-2020, 01:52 PM
#31
Get me outta here...
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Originally Posted by Winston
The goal is to make it increasingly cost prohibitive to furlough pilots.
Are you seriously asking if we can find a way to weaken furlough protections built into the UPA?
Unbelievable.
Are you seriously asking if we can find a way to weaken furlough protections built into the UPA?
Unbelievable.
Keep the the jets only able to fly 70 people.
And find a way to do it that will put money in the union's pocket...preferably toward the furlough fund.
Really? You're going to accuse me of a desire to weaken furlough protections without actually reading what I wrote with any level of comprehension? That is the "unbelievable" part.
05-21-2020, 02:14 PM
#33
777 - ret
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Position: Waco CG-4 center seat
Posts: 863
Originally Posted by Winston
The goal is to make it increasingly cost prohibitive to furlough pilots.
Are you seriously asking if we can find a way to weaken furlough protections built into the UPA?
Unbelievable.
Are you seriously asking if we can find a way to weaken furlough protections built into the UPA?
Unbelievable.
Our job is to defend the contract that we have and improve it when possible.
They got us in 2003 then again later and we still are short of what we had.
Dont be fooled again.
05-21-2020, 03:06 PM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B737 CAPT IAH
Posts: 1,130
Originally Posted by HuggyU2
No, Winston... go back and read what I wrote.
Keep the the jets only able to fly 70 people.
And find a way to do it that will put money in the union's pocket...preferably toward the furlough fund.
Really? You're going to accuse me of a desire to weaken furlough protections without actually reading what I wrote with any level of comprehension? That is the "unbelievable" part.
Keep the the jets only able to fly 70 people.
And find a way to do it that will put money in the union's pocket...preferably toward the furlough fund.
Really? You're going to accuse me of a desire to weaken furlough protections without actually reading what I wrote with any level of comprehension? That is the "unbelievable" part.
Lee
05-21-2020, 05:04 PM
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 491
Originally Posted by HuggyU2
No, Winston... go back and read what I wrote.
Keep the the jets only able to fly 70 people.
And find a way to do it that will put money in the union's pocket...preferably toward the furlough fund.
Really? You're going to accuse me of a desire to weaken furlough protections without actually reading what I wrote with any level of comprehension? That is the "unbelievable" part.
Keep the the jets only able to fly 70 people.
And find a way to do it that will put money in the union's pocket...preferably toward the furlough fund.
Really? You're going to accuse me of a desire to weaken furlough protections without actually reading what I wrote with any level of comprehension? That is the "unbelievable" part.
05-21-2020, 09:09 PM
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B737 CAPT IAH
Posts: 1,130
Originally Posted by HuggyU2
That's exactly the point. Thank you for making it.
Be well,
Lee
05-21-2020, 11:38 PM
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: Guppy Capt
Posts: 151
Originally Posted by Huell
They got us in 2003 then again later and we still are short of what we had.
Dont be fooled again.
Dont be fooled again.
And Huggy Brother, this ain’t the military. A lot of ex-Mil guys have a hard time with the mentality shift. Uncle Sugar ain’t here to help ya. You are simply a line item to the company. They will NEVER have your back.
05-22-2020, 07:00 AM
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Position: 757/767
Posts: 185
Originally Posted by Freight Dawg
This needs to be said again
And Huggy Brother, this ain’t the military. A lot of ex-Mil guys have a hard time with the mentality shift. Uncle Sugar ain’t here to help ya. You are simply a line item to the company. They will NEVER have your back.
And Huggy Brother, this ain’t the military. A lot of ex-Mil guys have a hard time with the mentality shift. Uncle Sugar ain’t here to help ya. You are simply a line item to the company. They will NEVER have your back.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
