Search

Notices

Earnings!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2020 | 09:32 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
normal revenue.....not normal flights. Revenue was never forecast to be 60-70% by Q3.

AUG sked will be 35-40% of normal and the schedule will remain consistent throughout the rest of 2020. So by default this falls sked will be about 60% just because of normal seasonal reductions. No one is going to be getting a second or third furlough.
... unless traffic and revenues don't recover. I'm not ruling out a very slow recovery.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 10:29 AM
  #22  
Nucflash's Avatar
Orbis Non Sufficit
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 788
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
No one is going to be getting a second or third furlough.
Bold statement.....
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 10:41 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
Bold statement.....
Just like Dougie Parker said airlines will never lose money again!? I’m betting on a very slow recovery with more furloughs in the spring. Hope I’m wrong.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 10:42 AM
  #24  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
Bold statement.....
it’s 4000 pilots to hit pre merger pilots. Add in 500 for early retirement plus another 500 for LOA...... (I think those are extremely conservative).... Thats 5000 pilots out the door before a pre merger pilot is even touched. Do you think this airline can survive with a schedule that low? Because I don’t if we send 5000+ pilots to the street we are done as a company.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 10:45 AM
  #25  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

FWIW, the investor call from this morning is posted online @ ir.united.com

One item that caught my attention was the fact that UAL still has an estimated $9B in unencumbered assets remaining after the current initiatives and the government loan. Recall that prior to the merger both UAL and CAL had virtually no unencumbered assets on the books (except the mileage programs). That means UAL generated a stunning amount of cash during the past decade when it both paid down debt and pushed $9B to the stockholders.

Strange there was no money for a pilot contract.....
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 11:17 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
it’s 4000 pilots to hit pre merger pilots. Add in 500 for early retirement plus another 500 for LOA...... (I think those are extremely conservative).... Thats 5000 pilots out the door before a pre merger pilot is even touched. Do you think this airline can survive with a schedule that low? Because I don’t if we send 5000+ pilots to the street we are done as a company.
That's another bold statement.
This company is very likely to survive even if it shrinks to 1/3 its current size or smaller. It's not about shrinking to profitability; it's about shrinking to stop the cash bleed. The company goes into survival mode and sheds as many expenses as possible. Perhaps even a visit to the man in the black dress. But I don't foresee the United as a likely outcome.
It sucks, but if the company needs a lot fewer widgets pilots for an extended period of time, the company will reduce the number of widgets furlough enough pilots to right size.

Another concern to me is Federal support post-election. If Biden wins and the Ds gain seats in the Senate, all this 'corporate welfare' will disappear and the Ds will blame any economic downturn on Trump's poor handling of the economy. I could just recycle one of the previous scripts they've used, changing minor details and it's updated to fit what's happening right now.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 11:26 AM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default History....but more importantly Voluntary

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
it’s 4000 pilots to hit pre merger pilots. Add in 500 for early retirement plus another 500 for LOA...... (I think those are extremely conservative).... Thats 5000 pilots out the door before a pre merger pilot is even touched. Do you think this airline can survive with a schedule that low? Because I don’t if we send 5000+ pilots to the street we are done as a company.
Not a cheery subject, but I don't know on that one...my Dad was an old TWA guy and he watched TWA shrink by more than half while remaining TWA. He ended up retiring as AA bought them up but I remember him talking about TWA going from 4000 pilots or so to 2000 pilots when AA came along. My uncles were both PSA pilots and they watched their company shrink by 40% until US Air took them over late 80s, early 90s. It may be a long process but there is historic precedent for a gradual and slow decline. Even the old stand alone UAL shrank around 35-40% from the 12,000 pilot (give or take 9/11 workforce) to the 8000 or so that ended up in the merger. My numbers may be off given memory. Not saying there will always be a UAL but it may take a while.

Other than healthcare, is there a good reason to go with the Plus version of the Voluntary Furlough? I asked on the other board and it was clear that there aren't many positives to the Plus from those folks.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 11:30 AM
  #28  
Huell's Avatar
777 - ret
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Waco CG-4 center seat
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
That's another bold statement.
This company is very likely to survive even if it shrinks to 1/3 its current size or smaller. It's not about shrinking to profitability; it's about shrinking to stop the cash bleed. The company goes into survival mode and sheds as many expenses as possible. Perhaps even a visit to the man in the black dress. But I don't foresee the United as a likely outcome.
It sucks, but if the company needs a lot fewer widgets pilots for an extended period of time, the company will reduce the number of widgets furlough enough pilots to right size.

Another concern to me is Federal support post-election. If Biden wins and the Ds gain seats in the Senate, all this 'corporate welfare' will disappear and the Ds will blame any economic downturn on Trump's poor handling of the economy. I could just recycle one of the previous scripts they've used, changing minor details and it's updated to fit what's happening right now.
Oh dear God ... I'm skerd now. If we don't re-elect pOTUS we are skrewed.

Bovine Secretions.

That would be like choosing between a clown and a LEADER.

I would rather have the LEADER.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 11:36 AM
  #29  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by LAXLUVR
Not a cheery subject, but I don't know on that one...my Dad was an old TWA guy and he watched TWA shrink by more than half while remaining TWA. He ended up retiring as AA bought them up but I remember him talking about TWA going from 4000 pilots or so to 2000 pilots when AA came along. My uncles were both PSA pilots and they watched their company shrink by 40% until US Air took them over late 80s, early 90s. It may be a long process but there is historic precedent for a gradual and slow decline. Even the old stand alone UAL shrank around 35-40% from the 12,000 pilot (give or take 9/11 workforce) to the 8000 or so that ended up in the merger. My numbers may be off given memory. Not saying there will always be a UAL but it may take a while.

Other than healthcare, is there a good reason to go with the Plus version of the Voluntary Furlough? I asked on the other board and it was clear that there aren't many positives to the Plus from those folks.
hood post and just proves my point none of those companies exist anymore.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 11:38 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Huell
Oh dear God ... I'm skerd now. If we don't re-elect pOTUS we are skrewed.

Bovine Secretions.

That would be like choosing between a clown and a LEADER.

I would rather have the LEADER.
They're both corrupt clowns. There are no leaders running in 2020.

You're almost out the door anyway so none of it is going affect you.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1st Supersonic
Atlas/Polar
20692
04-19-2026 01:58 AM
serce
Major
894
04-07-2021 06:56 PM
krudawg
United
12
01-24-2018 06:41 PM
Timeoff2fish
Cargo
9
07-26-2010 05:13 PM
Sasquatch
Cargo
0
06-21-2006 08:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices