Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
UAL: Cares 2 on hold, now what >

UAL: Cares 2 on hold, now what

Search
Notices

UAL: Cares 2 on hold, now what

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2020, 11:54 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 View Post
Based on your comments, the emphasis should be on cutting costs while still keeping the most bodies on property to cover the essential stuff. Therefore, I suggest we furlough from the top. Cut the highest paid and least productive. After all, that’s what “the market” would do. 🙄

Obviously my statement isn’t serious....but your statements reek of “too senior to be affected.”

Market forces didn’t kill our demand. Government mandates did. If the public just decided not to fly all by themselves, I might agree with you......but that’s not what happened. The public IS afraid to fly, but they’re also not willing to fly to places that are closed. That’s not a market force. I understand that you’re concerned that your large salary and 401k might not have the buying power it did before this all happened......but I’m more concerned about having ZERO buying power because of a furlough that shouldn’t have ever needed to happen. If taxes go up and the dollar gets a bit weaker, but more livelihoods remain viable.....I will sleep just fine with that.

* interesting side note.....the more time goes by, the more apparent it is that there’s nothing “UNITED” about “The United States of America”, nor “United Airlines.” The country is divided by politics and ideology, and the company seems to be divided based on experience. This company is full of battle-scarred senior people who don’t GAF about anybody junior (or senior) to them.....and it’s absolutely causing the rest of us to feel the same way.

**if your username is a Mel Brooks reference.....that’s one of the best movies ever.
First of all, you got the Hedley reference, but it isn’t one of the best movies, it is THE best movie.

I didn’t say that I wouldn’t be affected by all of this, I said that I wouldn’t be furloughed. I’m going to be taking a large reduction in pay, and having been furloughed, broke, started over with small kids, etc, I consider myself very fortunate to only be taking a pay cut this time. I would agree that global government mandates caused a significant part, if not most of our problems, but they also created the same problems for countless others in our society. The government restrictions cant be blamed for all of our problems either. Public fear had caused reservations to tank before the first government restrictions were put into place. Even if we opened up unrestricted global travel today, public fear of travel would still hammer future bookings. At this point the lack of a proven vaccine and/or cure has as much of an impact on demand as government restrictions. Why should we ask the American citizens to subsidize our industry until things come back, yet leave the small business owner and all of those who worked for that person to twist in the wind? I don’t want to diminish what airline families are facing. Many of us have been there before, some more than once, and it’s always painful, but does reducing our pain deserve taxpayer funding while many more lose everything they’ve ever worked for and get nothing?

I don’t think that the senior battle scared people don’t care about others, it’s that they have been through this many times and they are just numb now. They were the biggest company cheerleaders when they got hired, and were sure that they’d never be the grumpy old guy. After living an airline career and watching what those before you went through, it isn’t that you’re insensitive to the junior pilots today, it’s just that you have come to realize that we went into this with visions of making millions, flying cool planes, and traveling to exotic places, but found a brutal, take no prisoners industry instead.
Hedley is offline  
Old 08-16-2020, 12:29 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Position: 757/767
Posts: 185
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley View Post
This is a tough sell for any politician. We (pilots) are asking the American taxpayers to protect our 6 figure incomes until our services are needed again while countless others lose their life savings watching their family businesses and restaurants go bankrupt, putting far more people out of work. I don’t want to see airline employees on the streets, but why do we deserve government aid while the average citizen goes broke? You can only print so much money, and you can’t help everyone. Where does it end?
1. The airline industry is deemed essential to our national economy (mail, militarily/government movement, medical supplies, business)

2. Laws and regulations placed upon us by gov’t require special training for licensing and operations

3. Airline industry personnel vote in every state throughout the union.
Deathray is offline  
Old 08-16-2020, 12:34 PM
  #23  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley View Post
This is a tough sell for any politician. We (pilots) are asking the American taxpayers to protect our 6 figure incomes until our services are needed again while countless others lose their life savings watching their family businesses and restaurants go bankrupt, putting far more people out of work. I don’t want to see airline employees on the streets, but why do we deserve government aid while the average citizen goes broke? You can only print so much money, and you can’t help everyone. Where does it end?
The pilots are only a tiny drop in the bucket. The optics and politics are all about the vast majority of airline employees who are relatively low income (and heavily unionized). The party that favors unions cannot simply cut out the pilot unions because they make too much... kind of defeats the whole point of unions if you get punished for success by the party which advocates for unions... especially since pilot unions do tend to endorse said party.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-16-2020, 02:27 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by Deathray View Post
1. The airline industry is deemed essential to our national economy (mail, militarily/government movement, medical supplies, business)

2. Laws and regulations placed upon us by gov’t require special training for licensing and operations

3. Airline industry personnel vote in every state throughout the union.
nobody blinked and eye when Compass, TSA and now XJT went south.

the assets will be redeployed, new crews hires and trained and things will continue just fine.

there will be more noise if United goes away but it doesnt exactly create a supply shortage anywhere if that happened.

The others can easily cover any “essential” mail, mil/gov obligations.

eventually the assets will be redeployed elsewhere and business goes on.
TFAYD is offline  
Old 08-16-2020, 03:06 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD View Post
nobody blinked and eye when Compass, TSA and now XJT went south.

the assets will be redeployed, new crews hires and trained and things will continue just fine.

there will be more noise if United goes away but it doesnt exactly create a supply shortage anywhere if that happened.

The others can easily cover any “essential” mail, mil/gov obligations.

eventually the assets will be redeployed elsewhere and business goes on.
He gets it. Braniff, Eastern, and Pan Am all went away, the remaining airlines picked the carcass clean, and the world kept spinning. The infrastructure isn’t in jeopardy, the assets are still there, and the market can redistribute them as needed. Believing in free markets and capitalism is kind of like having a religious faith. It is easy to believe when the world is going your way. The test is if you still believe when life kicks you in the junk.
Hedley is offline  
Old 08-16-2020, 03:18 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2020
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald View Post
I'm sure I don't need to remind you, that there are more airline employees making far less than there are pilots. Several hundred thousand across the US in fact. If you want a transportation system on the other side, couple that with the infrastructure required to run an airline, this makes investment in the airlines almost mandatory. Pilots are a blip. We may benefit by the bailout, but we are not the emphasis.
I would also add CARES give money to a lot more then just airlines. We are a tiny portion of it.
Downtime is offline  
Old 08-16-2020, 04:48 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
... especially since pilot unions do tend to endorse said party.

Out of curiosity, when was the last time and which pilot union endorsed a certain party?

Originally Posted by duvie View Post
If you have buddies at UPS or FedEx, you might’ve heard them complaining about how Amazon is able to cherry pick the highest yield cargo routes…

I’ve never heard them say that. FedEx got rid of the amazon contract precisely because of the opposite, low yield cargo. Their high yield cargo is all B2B, which amazon doesn’t really do.
FXLAX is offline  
Old 08-16-2020, 05:12 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Position: 757/767
Posts: 185
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD View Post
nobody blinked and eye when Compass, TSA and now XJT went south.

the assets will be redeployed, new crews hires and trained and things will continue just fine.

there will be more noise if United goes away but it doesnt exactly create a supply shortage anywhere if that happened.

The others can easily cover any “essential” mail, mil/gov obligations.

eventually the assets will be redeployed elsewhere and business goes on.
i was talking about the airline industry as a whole.
Deathray is offline  
Old 08-16-2020, 05:15 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 847
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
Out of curiosity, when was the last time and which pilot union endorsed a certain party?




I’ve never heard them say that. FedEx got rid of the amazon contract precisely because of the opposite, low yield cargo. Their high yield cargo is all B2B, which amazon doesn’t really do.
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...300346764.html

ALPA National stayed out of the 2016 fight but ALPA is an affliate of the AFL-CIO.

https://aflcio.org/press/releases/af...nton-president

Last edited by tallpilot; 08-16-2020 at 05:31 PM.
tallpilot is offline  
Old 08-16-2020, 05:16 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
Out of curiosity, when was the last time and which pilot union endorsed a certain party?
ALPA endorsed Bill Clinton, John Kerry, and Barack Obama to name a few. I couldn’t find an official reference from ALPA endorsing Hilary Clinton, just Facebook and non official social media stuff.
Hedley is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fortyeight
Republic Airways
203
09-23-2018 06:28 PM
EZBW
United
131
05-04-2017 08:19 PM
Airhoss
United
210
09-04-2012 06:48 AM
TruthHurts
United
48
04-04-2012 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices