Search

Notices

AIP Rumor Mill

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2020 | 05:59 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default AIP Rumor Mill

Here’s what we’ve heard so far:

Agreement in principle reached to mitigate all furloughs

cancel displacements of *top 2 thirds* of pilot group

all DH in first

11K LTD

some RSV improvements

bottom 1/3 (who would of been furloughed) get 50% MPG, Middle 1/3 takes 20% MPG cut, top 1/3 takes 10% MPG cut

Dynamic snap backs based on demand metrics compared to 2019 demand #’s

costs the company more money than a straight furlough

flexibility to quickly recover

11k LTD permanent after 6 months

1st Class DH - permanent after 6 months

RSV rules - permanent after 6 months

Decent pay raise after 6 months

bottom 1/3rd displacements ARE NOT cancelled

snap up metrics are based on Load Factor, not revenue

the decrease in MPG goes up starting at 60% LF
Reply
Old 09-11-2020 | 06:11 PM
  #2  
ugleeual's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 47
From: 767/757 CA
Default

Add bottom 1/3 of list not pay protected from any displacement since March 2020
Reply
Old 09-11-2020 | 06:21 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Any reattack on the Early Out program for the 62-64 crowd who didn't take it last time?

I keep hearing about MPG cuts, but what about Line Credit Averages, Line Credit Floors, and Line Credit Caps for schedule building?

Scope changes? For the better or worse?

What about contractual provisions that are triggered during furloughs? For example the 'tightening' of the LCA to 74-82?

What if a pilot would prefer to be furloughed and had a job lined up? Would it be classified as an involuntary furlough? Would they be guaranteed a long term COLA?

Under what terms can we terminate this agreement?
Reply
Old 09-11-2020 | 06:50 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Default

Just wondering.. IF the middle third were supposedly to not be furloughed, then what justifies the deeper MPG cut compared to the top third? Aside from “gotta pay your dues”...
Reply
Old 09-11-2020 | 06:54 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Default

Guys guys guys don’t worry... these snap backs are ‘dynamic’!
Reply
Old 09-11-2020 | 08:59 PM
  #6  
HuggyU2's Avatar
Get me outta here...
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
From: Boeing right seat
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
Any reattack on the Early Out program for the 62-64 crowd who didn't take it last time?
Can we include the 55 and above crowd on the next iteration?
Reply
Old 09-11-2020 | 09:13 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,633
Likes: 209
Default

Originally Posted by SystemB
Just wondering.. IF the middle third were supposedly to not be furloughed, then what justifies the deeper MPG cut compared to the top third? Aside from “gotta pay your dues”...
The carrot is the cancellation of the displacement, so despite the MPG reduction, those displaced to a lower paying fleet or seat would make up the lower MPG at the higher rate. The only justification is that they’d be willing to accept it.
Reply
Old 09-11-2020 | 10:46 PM
  #8  
HuggyU2's Avatar
Get me outta here...
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
From: Boeing right seat
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
What if a pilot would prefer to be furloughed and had a job lined up?
Yep. I know a number of guys potentially in this boat.
Reply
Old 09-12-2020 | 03:52 AM
  #9  
Dicecal's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: F-16
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2
Can we include the 55 and above crowd on the next iteration?
Would be nice, final numbers after those that didn’t sign the waiver is a whopping 454. Also real slick making this “AIP” public while CARES2 is still in play.... (admittedly may not happen anyway)
Reply
Old 09-12-2020 | 04:21 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SystemB
Just wondering.. IF the middle third were supposedly to not be furloughed, then what justifies the deeper MPG cut compared to the top third? Aside from “gotta pay your dues”...
I don't have any insider information but I look at this way, as of today we are flying about 1/3 of our schedule, hence we theoretically could cut 2/3 of the pilots tomorrow and still staff our operation. The top third has no risk of furlough (but they could face displacement), the bottom third face an immediate furlough and the second third is on deck should things not pick up. So, from a risk/reward standpoint, the buckets make sense. What will be interesting to find out is what exactly is the mechanism for restoring MPG? If 60% is the first gate, what happens? The second third would be safe from furlough at that point, so do they gain the most? Are the gains shared by all the groups equally?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NavyFlyer
Delta
195
09-03-2016 11:31 AM
JohnGardner
Regional
44
02-11-2014 06:50 PM
samballs
Regional
368
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
SoCalGuy
United
330
08-18-2012 05:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices