Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   The New Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/131170-new-delta-ta.html)

dmeg13021 09-28-2020 02:26 PM

Could anyone with an ERAU degree vote no?

Galaxy5 09-28-2020 02:32 PM


Originally Posted by dmeg13021 (Post 3137163)
Could anyone with an ERAU degree vote no?

Thats why I stood up and asked at the town hall if we really thought it was fair to let ERAU grads vote. I mean, they’re an obvious yes voting in pure self interest.

130drvr 10-01-2020 02:33 PM


Originally Posted by Half wing (Post 3137083)
Did anyone on APC with 130 in their screen name vote yes for this TA? Independent thinking is hard.

yes, I did

blizzue 10-01-2020 02:37 PM


Originally Posted by WhiskeyDelta (Post 3136800)
The federal gov has absolutely no authority to mandate masks. If they did it would have already been done. All Biden has said is he will try to convince governors to continue with mandates, most likely by threatening to withhold federal funding.

ha. Ha. Aha.

130drvr 10-01-2020 02:38 PM


Originally Posted by Galaxy5 (Post 3137109)
Community had a reputation for being loud talking paint chip eaters in the AF. Maybe they all grew up under power lines?

But paint chips are so tasty

ERAUAV8TR 10-01-2020 07:50 PM


Originally Posted by dmeg13021 (Post 3137163)
Could anyone with an ERAU degree vote no?

Voted YES!!!

Big E 757 10-01-2020 09:04 PM


Originally Posted by mmm123 (Post 3134348)
I can't believe anyone here believes that running full steam once the virus passes. Our MEC has really sold that line to our pilots. Just like the fb united pilots page that jump s for joy every time someone counts 5 more people at the airport tsa line. I don't see that happening, the company doesn't see that happening, nobody sees that happening. Oh sorry except the mec selling this ta. Hey I hope I am dead wrong, but really don't think so.

After 9/11, airlines furloughed thousands. There was no thought of a quick recovery, and they were right for the most part. By the time I got furloughed in May of 2002, our planes were pretty full but only because of the fare sales. Yields were down and we were losing money despite the decent load factor.

Why do you think our different management teams (I’m at DL) are all trying to keep pilots on board and come up with solutions to save money while maintaining staffing levels? I was only a major airline pilot during the 2001-2003 furloughs, but I don’t remember another downturn when management tried to save jobs. I will say I know with absolute certainty that they’re not trying to save jobs to help our junior brothers and sisters support their families. My only conclusion thus far, is that they all think we will recover much faster from this, than we did from a terrorist attack or a slump in the economy, and don’t want to bump and flush, just to re-train in 6-12 months.

What do you see happening going forward? I’m honestly curious what I’m missing, or where my thoughts are going off the rails.

TransWorld 10-01-2020 09:17 PM


Originally Posted by 130drvr (Post 3138765)
But paint chips are so tasty

Only the lead ones, They are sweet and tasty.

Dave Fitzgerald 10-02-2020 03:20 AM


Originally Posted by 130drvr (Post 3138758)
yes, I did

I thought you said you were done here?

ReadOnly7 10-02-2020 05:41 AM


Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald (Post 3138982)
I thought you said you were done here?

that was 130shadow


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands