|
Originally Posted by ERAUAV8TR
(Post 3138928)
Voted YES!!!
|
Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
(Post 3139059)
that was 130shadow
|
Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
(Post 3139234)
Ah, I'm easily confused. I flew a Lockheed product as well. I was always amazed it worked at all.
|
Originally Posted by Galaxy5
(Post 3137109)
Community had a reputation for being loud talking paint chip eaters in the AF. Maybe they all grew up under power lines?
|
Originally Posted by Galaxy5
(Post 3139253)
Is it the one that worked best where per diem was lowest? Interesting design feature ��
All my planes got chopped up and melted. But...in it's defense, it usually worked. Not like that overweight, obese, how many tires did it have, monster. If we kicked it hard enough we could usually get it to go. |
Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
(Post 3139638)
I could never figure out how the plane knew that!
All my planes got chopped up and melted. But...in it's defense, it usually worked. Not like that overweight, obese, how many tires did it have, monster. If we kicked it hard enough we could usually get it to go. |
Originally Posted by dmeg13021
(Post 3137163)
Could anyone with an ERAU degree vote no?
|
Originally Posted by Hrkdrivr
(Post 3139262)
That's rich coming from a C-5 guy.
|
Originally Posted by D B Cooper
(Post 3140003)
Maybe he drives a Ford Galaxy?
|
Originally Posted by Freddriver5
(Post 3139683)
I got an all expense paid week in Djibouti to include watching the Superbowl thanks to a hydraulic leak while flying FRED. So, it's not always the per diem machine...just most of the time. I even got to watch the khat delivery plane park next to my leaking mess. Ahhh... memories.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:25 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands