Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   United diversity....... (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/133541-united-diversity.html)

detpilot 06-04-2021 07:31 PM


Originally Posted by Bestglide (Post 3245517)
Do you think airlines are afraid of lawsuits if they fire certain pilots in today’s woke world? If not then I have some ocean front property in Arizona to sell you

I stand by what I said. Offensive to you or not.

Aviation isn’t like any other cooperation. We need to hire the best and brightest no matter what demographic they fit in.

We aren’t like Coca Cola if you put in the wrong ingredients it just tastes bad….in our industry people die. And for that I’m unapologetic.

Honestly, I'm sure someone is concerned about it... But if a corporation is afraid to fire someone with just cause... A corporation with a huge legal department and who clearly makes strides to improve diversity and inclusion, then I'd say that's one manager who needs to go. You meet the standards, or you don't. Whether it's a regional or a major, that's how it is. So, what's the problem? The problem was at Atlas, they showed someone to continue flying who did not meet the standard. Make excuses about the company being "afraid" and throw the new right wing buzz word "woke" around all you want...the fact remains that atlas management killed our new hire by failing to enforce standards on their pilots.

United airlines enforces the standards. So what is the problem, again?

Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk

detpilot 06-04-2021 07:36 PM


Originally Posted by RJSAviator76 (Post 3245541)
Do you know why those presumptions occur in the first place?

Because of the woke BS that the left perpetuates. The last 5 minority pilots I flew with all hate this “diversity and inclusion” quota goals for this very reason and all say the exact same thing - it creates doubt that they only got hired because of their skin color and not their merit. In other words, it takes away from their achievements. You are always leaving a doubt in their minds - “did I really earn this?” and you’re leaving doubt in other people’s minds whereas now anyone regardless of race and sex show up, you automatically presume they’re there on their own merit, after this wokism crap, the question will always be present “merit or race/sex?”

You can shout until you’re blue in the face that they “still earned it” but the reality stands that as long as there is a written and coded preference based on race and sex, that preference alone will always cast doubt on whether that individual has earned his or her spot based on merit or their skin color. And that’s not healthy for anyone.

Tammy Jo earned it. Mimi Tompkins earned it. Lou Freeman earned it. Thousands of others have earned it. Do we really need to take away from their achievements and accomplishments to make our white selves feel virtuous?

All 5 of the minority pilots you've flown with have a problem with the zero hour aviate program trying to intake 50% minority candidates? Of which, only a small percentage will ever become airline pilots, and an even smaller percentage United pilots? That's strange, because most people I fly with either don't know much about the Aviate program or have someone they know who they are trying to get into it. In fact... I don't recall talking about diversity at all on my last few trips. Is that something you like to bring up with the minority pilots?

Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk

ERAUAV8TR 06-04-2021 07:52 PM


Originally Posted by detpilot (Post 3245733)
All 5 of the minority pilots you've flown with have a problem with the zero hour aviate program trying to intake 50% minority candidates? Of which, only a small percentage will ever become airline pilots, and an even smaller percentage United pilots? That's strange, because most people I fly with either don't know much about the Aviate program or have someone they know who they are trying to get into it. In fact... I don't recall talking about diversity at all on my last few trips. Is that something you like to bring up with the minority pilots?

Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk

The news was just talking about this study and it reminded me of this forum debate. It found that an African-American name on a resume is worth 8 years of experience. Thats a lot when compared to the airline sector.

https://cos.gatech.edu/facultyres/Di...kishaJamal.pdf

RJSAviator76 06-04-2021 09:57 PM

United diversity.......
 

Originally Posted by detpilot (Post 3245733)
All 5 of the minority pilots you've flown with have a problem with the zero hour aviate program trying to intake 50% minority candidates? Of which, only a small percentage will ever become airline pilots, and an even smaller percentage United pilots? That's strange, because most people I fly with either don't know much about the Aviate program or have someone they know who they are trying to get into it. In fact... I don't recall talking about diversity at all on my last few trips. Is that something you like to bring up with the minority pilots?

Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk


All 5 of these guys seem to have a problem with quotas and anything that suggests they earned their spot due to their skin color and not their merit. I know that’s a very difficult concept for the woke geniuses to understand. To woke people, it appears that minorities must be incapable of achieving their goals and dreams without the virtuous woke white people letting them do so via quotas and virtue signaling.

Also, just about every pilot I know couldn’t give two feces about the race or sex of the person who’s sitting next to them. It’s as relevant as the color of their eyes. The topic would come up when talking about kids pursuing aviation, discussing airline hiring, and it’s not like this was some obscure news release either.

Grumpyaviator 06-05-2021 04:11 AM


Originally Posted by detpilot;[url=tel:3245723
3245723[/url]]Except that we do hire the most qualified, yet minorities like myself have been the brunt of "diversity hire" comments, both in civilian and military circles. Someone even implied that somehow I was "given" DG in an AF program (talk about seeing red!) for to diversity quotas. I'm truly glad you've never experienced this.

Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk

Ironic that this reply was to a “minority like yourself “. If you’ve both experienced the same scrutiny, skepticism and barriers, why are your attitudes so different?

btw, my wife and kids are minorities so this is an important topic to me.

ducgsxr 06-05-2021 04:19 AM


Originally Posted by C130driver (Post 3245486)
That’s what these people do, they cancel you. Whether it’s banning you from Facebook or advocating you don’t be hired. These people preach and beat off to diversity yet can’t stand an opposing non woke opinion. They are hypocrites and utilize the same tactics as Marxists. Let’s be honest, United doesn’t care about diversity (they care about $$), they are just too scared about not being woke enough.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

True. Well said.

fadec 06-05-2021 05:53 PM

This looks like a normal business, but bolsheviks are using it for cover. The pilot must always examine his surroundings for anything that is out of place, because his enemy is skilled and determined. Take this HR department for example. Its flexible standards offer superior concealment to the production and service centers of the business. Luckily First Officer Robertson is an adept and observant employee. There he is, FO Robertson. Get him! CRACK!!! Another day is saved by vigilant employees like you.

idlethrust 06-13-2021 05:25 AM


Originally Posted by EWRflyr (Post 3245468)
I'd be willing to gamble the deed to my condo that more bent metal or other serious accidents have been caused by unqualified WHITE MALES since the beginning of aviation than any other demographic. I could be wrong, but doubt it. *TONGUE IN CHEEK*

Now, were all these white male pilots really unqualified? Most certainly not. Are all accidents a chain of events that if broken would never have happened? Absolutely. We have gone from the hardware being the cause of most accidents to human factors being the #1 driver of incidents/accidents.

Historically there have been mostly white males as pilots. Why? Women and minorities were not given access to the same opportunities as white men. Not allowed to fly in the military or even serve at times. Not to mention the other barriers to entering this field that are socio-economic in nature. That is changing and United is a corporation advancing with the times. They are also legally responsible for the decisions that put pilots in the flight decks of hundred million dollar plus airplanes carrying hundreds of customers. The FAA and insurers have a say as well.

The unqualified argument is a load of **** and insulting to every person hired here who some don't view as fitting the traditional mold or saying this is different than how it's been for many years. Yes, you can read into that how that argument is being used in other segments of life, especially now.

Well said . I agree 1000%

Oletimer 06-14-2021 11:37 AM


Originally Posted by JoePatroni (Post 3245333)
How does that apply to the guy who got hired at 21 with 2000 hours because his father was a check airman?

That's a great point. That's no good. But, you and I know it's far worse than that. I can point to at least 7 people hired here that would have only had the flight time/qualificaitons to get on at a regional, at the time/date they were hired. However, due to their influence and connections, their lack of experience was overlooked or set a side.

My major point is this: I believe experience is a valuable teacher. One that cannot be immulated or short-cut. Experience, adn that building block aproach builds judgment. Someday when you upgrade, you lean on that judgement and pull from your past experiences. I would disagree with any process that short-cuts the building of, and the value of experience.

Lowering hiring minimums is akin to devaluing experience. Experience is the best teacher and therefore should not be marganilized or minimized, in partcular by HR who are setting minority quotas. We can call it "diversity" or whatever the buzz word of the day is. I call it "devaluing experience." The devaluing of experience will have an impact on safety. Maybe not today, but when you want to lean on and pull from that experience, it won't be there.

The other day, I went to look up something in my IPAD about windshear takeoffs as some foul WX aproached our runway for take off.. My IPAD froze on me. I had to lean on my experience. Sometimes our Ipads just don't work. I think you get my drift.

Oletimer 06-14-2021 11:43 AM

I wonder what the percentage is world-wide for pilots of genetic Swiss descent? Wouldn't they qualify as "diversity candidates?"

We could all look into our genetics, our past family tree to see where we descended from. I guess only women and people with brown skin color qualify as minorities. What a myopic view.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:50 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands