Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
DAL LTD “The Gold Standard” >

DAL LTD “The Gold Standard”

Search
Notices

DAL LTD “The Gold Standard”

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2022, 02:57 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 740
Default DAL LTD “The Gold Standard”

In response to my email about the significant differences in LTD benefits at DAL vs our TA. Our UAL MEC R&I Chairman referred to the current DAL LTD benefits as “The Gold Standard”. He agreed with me that I’d much prefer the DAL LTD (even though DAL’s is taxable and ours is tax fee) vs the UAL TA LTD.

Before I delve deeper into the LTD differences between DAL and our TA. Please understand the following.

At DAL on day 1 of LTD you get 100% of your regular 16% B plan company retirement contributions. The very same normal B plan company contributions you would receive if not on LTD.

Currently in our contract if on LTD you get zero B/C company retirement contributions.

IN OUR TA ALL UAL PILOTS GET 50% OF NORMAL B/C COMPANY RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS - THAT IS AFTER 3 YEARS ON LTD NOT ON DAY 1!

First three years on LTD in our TA - No retirement contributions.

For current 777 & 787 CA’s it’s less then 50% retirement contributions due to our caps. It will effect smaller aircraft 12 year captains but not nearly to the extent the Cap penalizes 777/787 CA’s for retirement on LTD.

In all fairness we did make some progress on LTD in this TA, but it’s woefully inadequate! How can we be getting 50% of what DAL is getting on LTD in retirement and have our LTD be sold as one of the best improvements in the TA by our MEC & NC? Unbelievable! Industry leading contract, yeah right.

Let’s compare both LTD plans.

DAL - 50% Pay plus 32% B Plan (thus the normal 16% B) NO CAP - Taxable

UAL TA - 50% Pay plus 16% B/C Plan after 3 years on LTD to CAP. Cap $12,500 a month initially slides up to $13,125 no later then 1/24 - Tax Free

DAL Pay is calculated at DAL as highest consecutive 12 months over the last 36 months.

UAL Pay is calculated at 85.5 hours per month (1026 hours annually) times rate or blended rate (as appropriate).

I could make the argument most line holders on the 777/787 earn more then 85.5 pay hours per month, especially with 6 weeks of vacation. But our system is better for reserves. So I will not debate this area.

Also, I’d much prefer DAL’s pay (No CAP) taxable vs our tax free with CAP. But I’ll just stick to the fact THAT ALL UAL pilots get 50% normal retirement on LTD (after 36 months on LTD not day 1) and all DAL pilots get full retirement day 1 on LTD.

Ok now let’s talk about our Cap. For current 777 & 787 CA’s (reserve and line holder). We will receive less then 16% after 36 months on LTD due to Cap.

Initial Widebody 12 year CA pay rate date of signing $365.94 X 85.5 X .50 equals $15,643.

At DAL (using UAL Widebody rate at 85.5 hours at DOS) that would be $15,643 X .32 (full retirement) equals $5,005.76 - DAY 1 LTD or $60,069.12 annually.

At UAL $15,643 lowered to $12,500 due to Cap $12,500 X .16 equals $2000 AFTER 36 MONTHS on LTD. 12.7% Retirement due to Cap. So that’s $24,000 annually.

That’s a $36,069.12 difference annually. Sound like we got industry leading LTD?

Look you never really appreciate LTD until you need LTD. Not getting a full retirement B/C contribution like DAL pilots is punishing all our pilots on LTD.

If you are as outraged as me on this very important substandard contractual provision. Please help me by doing the following:

1: I’m not on other forums or Facebook groups. Please help educate our pilots by posting threads of our totally inadequate TA LTD. You can copy and paste this post or edit, or write your own post. But get this info out to our pilots.

2: After this TA is voted down please contact your LEC reps and demand DAL type LTD or at least a full 32% B/C Fund contribution day one while on LTD.

3: Pass resolutions at upcoming LC meetings for the MEC to direct the NC to negotiate Full Retirement on day one on the LTD section on TA 2.

4: If polled please make sure to indicate the importance of a DAL type LTD with full retirement on day one (not after 36 months) on TA-2.
Boeing Aviator is online now  
Old 07-08-2022, 05:00 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Default

Apples and oranges. Delta is a different carrier with more lucrative domestic markets that weren't so badly hit by COVID-19. They have an industry-leading contract with excellent pay and work rules, so guys aren't so inclined to abuse LTD. If we had their LTD here, what do you think our premiums would be? You have to look at the big picture.
fadec is offline  
Old 07-08-2022, 05:11 PM
  #3  
Beaches and Sand
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Chasing Surf
Posts: 368
Default

Originally Posted by fadec View Post
Apples and oranges. Delta is a different carrier with more lucrative domestic markets that weren't so badly hit by COVID-19. They have an industry-leading contract with excellent pay and work rules, so guys aren't so inclined to abuse LTD. If we had their LTD here, what do you think our premiums would be? You have to look at the big picture.
Are you serious?!?! Absolutely should be the same or close to DAL for everyone industry wide. LTD is one of those that the companies chip away at and we all just accept that crap! Demand better, demand more!
kc10/c130 is offline  
Old 07-08-2022, 05:16 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 694
Default

Ok you’ve done the widebody numbers and kind of glossed over the taxable vs non-taxable. How does that work out for a narrowbody 12 yr CA? Aside from the 401k, does a non-capped out pilot do better due to the tax difference? I’m not suggesting we’re where we need to be but it looks like you’re picking the biggest pay scenario of the most senior widebody CAs with 6 weeks of vacation.

How much bargaining power do you want to divert in that specific direction?
Chuck D is offline  
Old 07-08-2022, 05:56 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck D View Post
Ok you’ve done the widebody numbers and kind of glossed over the taxable vs non-taxable. How does that work out for a narrowbody 12 yr CA? Aside from the 401k, does a non-capped out pilot do better due to the tax difference? I’m not suggesting we’re where we need to be but it looks like you’re picking the biggest pay scenario of the most senior widebody CAs with 6 weeks of vacation.

How much bargaining power do you want to divert in that specific direction?
​​​​​​Is bargaining power even a real quantity?
fadec is offline  
Old 07-08-2022, 06:05 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 740
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck D View Post
Ok you’ve done the widebody numbers and kind of glossed over the taxable vs non-taxable. How does that work out for a narrowbody 12 yr CA? Aside from the 401k, does a non-capped out pilot do better due to the tax difference? I’m not suggesting we’re where we need to be but it looks like you’re picking the biggest pay scenario of the most senior widebody CAs with 6 weeks of vacation.

How much bargaining power do you want to divert in that specific direction?
I used the Widebody Ca numbers to show that a Widebody CA gets less then 16% retirement due to cap.

Every single UAL pilot gets 50% (or less) vs DAL in retirement income. That’s after having 0 retirement for first 3 years on LTD.

That should infuriate all United pilots. 50% less retirement on LTD, first three years Nada vs full retirement on day one of LTD at DAL. It’s really that simple.

Again let’s review LTD formulas.

DAL 50% X Pay (No Cap) X 32% for retirement.

UAL TA. 50% X Pay (Cap) X 16% (after 3 years) for retirement.

All UAL pilots below Cap still get 50% retirement (after 0 for 3 years) vs Full Retirement at DAL day 1.

Last edited by Boeing Aviator; 07-08-2022 at 06:16 PM.
Boeing Aviator is online now  
Old 07-08-2022, 06:37 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 694
Default

Ok I get that. But what about someone not capped? 50% taxable at DL vs 50% NOT taxable at UAL. That’s what a 20-30ish% gov’t slice off DL depending on tax bracket? That goes a long way unless I’m missing something.
Chuck D is offline  
Old 07-08-2022, 06:56 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 859
Default

Wow,
looks like we are behind.

Tell me, what was out LTD at on Jan 1 2020?
ReadyRsv is offline  
Old 07-08-2022, 10:19 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 411
Default

Originally Posted by fadec View Post
Apples and oranges. Delta is a different carrier with more lucrative domestic markets that weren't so badly hit by COVID-19. They have an industry-leading contract with excellent pay and work rules, so guys aren't so inclined to abuse LTD. If we had their LTD here, what do you think our premiums would be? You have to look at the big picture.
Just going to say it. Your disgusting and an emberassment to the UAL pilots saying United is not an airline on par with Delta therefore UAL pilots deserve less. What's worse is that we are even debating LTD. The entire TA is a give back joke. While we squak about LTD and forget we have ZERO retirement plan management laughs at us. LTD should not be the discussion bit rather a retirement plan that pays out until death. Cmon man let's all get real for a second and stop being a bunch of roll overs.
Mytime2025 is offline  
Old 07-08-2022, 10:55 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Default

Originally Posted by Mytime2025 View Post
Just going to say it. Your disgusting and an emberassment to the UAL pilots saying United is not an airline on par with Delta therefore UAL pilots deserve less. What's worse is that we are even debating LTD. The entire TA is a give back joke. While we squak about LTD and forget we have ZERO retirement plan management laughs at us. LTD should not be the discussion bit rather a retirement plan that pays out until death. Cmon man let's all get real for a second and stop being a bunch of roll overs.
I'd like to respond in detail to address all of your points, except Monday's town hall is going to focus on insurance and retirement. Our negotiating committee is much better equipped to manage the attitudes and expectations of line pilots so I'll defer to them. Let's avoid kneejerk reactions and wait until Monday night to pass judgement.
fadec is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OverspeedCowboy
Delta
1
10-30-2019 07:42 AM
Codfather
Major
103
02-11-2019 04:40 PM
Sata 4000 RP
Major
20
06-09-2013 06:08 PM
Trash Hauler
Major
138
06-11-2012 06:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices