Search
Notices

Age 67

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2023, 03:56 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,327
Default

“Fairness”….HA! Like ANYTHING in life, let alone this ridiculous career…..is “fair”

When I see a bunch of junior pilots pooling their resources to start a fund for those who were furloughed twice or lost their pensions due to bankruptcy…..I’ll believe that “fairness” is a priority.

*crickets
ReadOnly7 is offline  
Old 03-28-2023, 04:32 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 View Post
it’s 100% “get out of my seat/line/vacation slot”. Period
This couldn't be further from the truth. I'm honestly happy to spend the next 30 years in my current seat. It's 100% about safety for me. I have flown with pilots over 65 and it isn't pretty. About half were fine, but the others were extremely weak and had no idea how much the other pilot was helping them. And even in 121, I have flown with a handful of 60-plus who were trending in the wrong direction. Before we even think about increasing the retirement age, we need a complete revamp of the FAA medical process.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 03-28-2023, 04:34 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 View Post
When I see a bunch of junior pilots pooling their resources to start a fund for those who were furloughed twice or lost their pensions due to bankruptcy…..
That makes zero sense. Junior pilots haven't earned as much as any furloughed pilot senior to them.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 03-28-2023, 05:58 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 456
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 View Post
“Fairness”….HA! Like ANYTHING in life, let alone this ridiculous career…..is “fair”

When I see a bunch of junior pilots pooling their resources to start a fund for those who were furloughed twice or lost their pensions due to bankruptcy…..I’ll believe that “fairness” is a priority.

*crickets
Sorry your timing sucked, gonna have to take that up with your parents, though.

🤷🏻‍♂️
Galaxy5 is offline  
Old 03-28-2023, 06:15 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cal73's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 855
Default

…filler for you
cal73 is offline  
Old 03-28-2023, 06:42 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,327
Default

Originally Posted by Galaxy5 View Post
Sorry your timing sucked, gonna have to take that up with your parents, though.

🤷🏻‍♂️
I have plenty of time left. Things staying at 65 definitely helps me. I’m just calling BS where I see it.
ReadOnly7 is offline  
Old 03-28-2023, 10:59 PM
  #27  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,943
Default

Originally Posted by Whiskeyjet1 View Post
No, it’s both safety and fairness. 63 seems to be the magic number where some folks really decline rapidly. A small percentage to be sure, but significant. It’s a problem that would grow exponentially if we change the age to 67.

It’s also not fair for folks who benefited from mandatory retirement age their whole career to get two bonus years at the very top of the heap, while most of us will lose those two years because I won’t be flying that long I promise you.
When I was young, age 30 seemed to be the magic number when some folks really declined rapidly. “Never trust anyone over 30.” The, when I hit 30, it was 40..
TransWorld is offline  
Old 03-28-2023, 11:30 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Position: DL320B
Posts: 210
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld View Post
When I was young, age 30 seemed to be the magic number when some folks really declined rapidly. “Never trust anyone over 30.” The, when I hit 30, it was 40..
So… don’t trust people over 65, or 67?
Flyweight is offline  
Old 03-29-2023, 08:29 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,882
Default

Originally Posted by Whiskeyjet1 View Post
No, it’s both safety and fairness. 63 seems to be the magic number where some folks really decline rapidly. A small percentage to be sure, but significant. It’s a problem that would grow exponentially if we change the age to 67.

It’s also not fair for folks who benefited from mandatory retirement age their whole career to get two bonus years at the very top of the heap, while most of us will lose those two years because I won’t be flying that long I promise you.
You mean like the 570s (which includes a former MEC vice chair and former MEC chair now ALPA 1st VP)? Never has a group benefited so much by being opportunists every chance they got.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 03-29-2023, 11:44 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Tesla S's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Position: 756FO
Posts: 99
Default

Originally Posted by dmeg13021 View Post
Get out of my seat…just like you agreed to at 60 when you got hired.
This is jacassery at best… there was no maximum age at one point, then some arbitrary age 60 was applied…for reasons. Then a new arbitrary 65 was instituted.

We could use an update to the FAA medical process, but the majority of 65 year olds are still sharp and are able to continue. I say let move the age to 68 and update the medical certification standards.
Tesla S is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Unicornpilot
Major
52
01-04-2020 07:23 AM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM
Andy
Major
25
11-20-2006 07:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices