Search

Notices

Age 67

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2023 | 04:06 PM
  #121  
line slug
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 7
From: B787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by JTwift
Age 65+ get put on continual Reserve until they hit 67. Then let's see how some of these older people feel about changing our reserve rules.
You mean the "older people" who had to sit 24/7 reserve before the feds changed those rules?
Old 05-08-2023 | 04:10 PM
  #122  
line slug
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 7
From: B787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by dmeg13021
I recommend you not steal two years of my earned seniority.
LOL. How do you think the old guys got their seniority? Wouldn't they have also been stuck for five years when the rule changed to 65?
Old 05-08-2023 | 05:41 PM
  #123  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by jdavk
LOL. How do you think the old guys got their seniority? Wouldn't they have also been stuck for five years when the rule changed to 65?
A lot of those lost most of their pension benefits or were furloughed during the lost decade. They welcomed age 65. Those at the front end who turned 60 right before the change were the ones who got shafted. A good friend was mandatory retired after losing most of his pension. Then age 65 kicked in when he was age 60 and 2 months.
Old 05-08-2023 | 05:52 PM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun;[url=tel:3633854
3633854[/url]]Clearly you don’t understand what happened last time. You might read up on what ICAO had just done with age 65 and the FAA agreeing to allow foreign pilots to fly to 65 in the US. There were 3 lawsuits over age 60 in the court system at the time. With the FAA agreeing it was now safe for pilots to fly in the US to 65 those court cases were now stone cold losers.
ALPA could have continued to oppose 65 and have a judge rule which best case would have been 65 or worst case no age limit and retired pilots allowed back. Instead they did the smart thing and worked with Congress and the FAA to craft legislation allowing 65 with no retired returns preempting the court cases. Sometimes you need to be smart and not push a 100% lost cause.
Originally Posted by sailingfun;[url=tel:3634121
3634121[/url]]The poll was a year or two prior to ICAO going to 65.
You are arguing with yourself here….and losing.
Old 05-08-2023 | 09:02 PM
  #125  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dc8co
Age 65 is an arbitrary age, but in a career like ours where literally the only way to advance your career is with mandatory retirements, a limit has to be set. This bill also came across because of regional airports are losing airline service, there's not many lifers at regionals where they would see much benefit to this. They more have a problem of sucking out from the bottom of the seniority list, not the top. The way to fix this is bringing all flying into mainline, not a bandaid fix that won't stop regional captains and first officers leaving en masse. So all this does is screw over fellow pilots.

If a new age is passed one thing will be for certain, there will eventually be pilots working at age 65-67 while pilots are on furlough.
Old 05-09-2023 | 09:05 AM
  #126  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Default

The Age 67 crowd sure has a strange way to win allies and influence votes of the vast majority of us who are against it.

I don't get why every thread tangentially related to Age 67 devolves into the ones in favor shouting, stomping, whining, insulting, doxxing, and threatening those who disagree, or crying crocodile tears about "discrimination" which they suddenly discovered after a whole career of being fine with mandatory retirement when it benefited them.

It's a money grab by those at the top. Pure and simple. Call it anything else and you're a liar.
Old 05-09-2023 | 10:06 AM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by Tropical;[url=tel:3634476
3634476[/url]]The Age 67 crowd sure has a strange way to win allies and influence votes of the vast majority of us who are against it.


It's a money grab by those at the top. Pure and simple. Call it anything else and you're a liar.
Nobody on this site will get a vote. Welcome to the airline industry. It has and always will be an eat the young business.
Old 05-09-2023 | 10:17 AM
  #128  
line slug
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 7
From: B787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
Nobody on this site will get a vote.
Which is precisely why we should spend exactly 0 seconds arguing about it. Of course, management is super pleased to see us fighting amongst ourselves, like always.
Old 05-09-2023 | 11:26 AM
  #129  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
Nobody on this site will get a vote. Welcome to the airline industry. It has and always will be an eat the young business.
And yet all anyone can do here is argue about it! Amazing!

Just stop already.
Old 05-09-2023 | 11:28 AM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tropical
And yet all anyone can do here is argue about it! Amazing!

Just stop already.
And yet you feel compelled to come over from Delta to engage. Maybe heed your own advice?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Unicornpilot
Major
52
01-04-2020 07:23 AM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM
Andy
Major
25
11-20-2006 07:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices