Search

Notices

New Crew Base ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2023 | 05:28 AM
  #11  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 108
Likes: 13
Default

SEA, BOS, PHX we’re on the list for the first round, the company stated there will be a second round on openings in early 2025. I’d expect those airports to continue to be on possible new domicile list.
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 05:50 AM
  #12  
luv757's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 534
Likes: 15
From: 18%er but I’ll enforce UPA23 to the last period.
Default

Originally Posted by AirportJunkie
SEA, BOS, PHX we’re on the list for the first round, the company stated there will be a second round on openings in early 2025. I’d expect those airports to continue to be on possible new domicile list.
BSO and PHX already also have FA bases (like LAS and MCO). I’d guess either/both of those are the winner.
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 06:35 AM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Default

TPA could be next as a crosstown base with MCO.
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 06:45 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlySaint
TPA could be next as a crosstown base with MCO.
TPA is a done deal with the AIP, it is specifically addressed as a crosstown
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 07:04 AM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 872
Likes: 32
Default

The satellite base experiment isn't working out too well in ewr on the 737. Mco, iad, ord, iah ... have all grown to gain Captains but that doesn't allow for them to efficiently staff early morning departures out of ewr. Just take a glance at the 15 premium pay trips every single day, reserves flying every rsv day, and 90 hr lines for almost the entire base which is pushing people out even faster. We have a lot of retirements in ewr (especially 777 and 787) and now they can't backfill those seats without hurting 737 staffing even more. Unless their plan is to staff some of the widebodies out of somewhere else like ord 777 flying.
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 07:19 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 670
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I can tell you from a Delta perspective. You open a crew base for two reasons. A reduction in credit hours and or an improvement in operational statistics. Hotel costs can be a third but minor player. HNL because all legs are more than 5 hours block to get there offers little in the way of credit reduction. In fact it likely increases credit because long legs make it much easier to build low credit rotations. Pull those long legs out of domestic bases may increase their credit. Operationally you also gain virtually nothing. With the weather in HNL and a predominantly one way traffic flow irops requiring reserve crews are non existent. In short a HNL base for airlines like Delta or UAL probably increases costs.
once upon a time UAL had HNL, like they did with SEA. I don’t see either coming back. We don’t connect Pax in sea, and with delta in town there really isn’t a market to add back the previous, and what was a small amount anyway, of intl flying we had. Plus SeaTac can’t handle more pax. Mia the same, and of course company choose mco/tpa. Phx is dead with Las open. I honestly can’t see any new bases coming anytime soon.
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 07:28 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 80
Default

Originally Posted by webecheck
once upon a time UAL had HNL, like they did with SEA. I don’t see either coming back. We don’t connect Pax in sea, and with delta in town there really isn’t a market to add back the previous, and what was a small amount anyway, of intl flying we had. Plus SeaTac can’t handle more pax. Mia the same, and of course company choose mco/tpa. Phx is dead with Las open. I honestly can’t see any new bases coming anytime soon.
mco 777 is next
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 07:51 AM
  #18  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JTwift
mco 777 is next
Any chance we see WB in LAS sometime?
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 08:15 AM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 213
Likes: 20
Default

Originally Posted by JTwift
mco 777 is next
Source?


Filler
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 08:49 AM
  #20  
Swakid8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 95
Default

Originally Posted by webecheck
once upon a time UAL had HNL, like they did with SEA. I don’t see either coming back. We don’t connect Pax in sea, and with delta in town there really isn’t a market to add back the previous, and what was a small amount anyway, of intl flying we had. Plus SeaTac can’t handle more pax. Mia the same, and of course company choose mco/tpa. Phx is dead with Las open. I honestly can’t see any new bases coming anytime soon.
You are confusing crew base with focus city/hub operations…..

Crew Bases do not require hub/focus city type operations. It will operate as a outstation crew base it was to become a crew base.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyGuy2021
American
995
11-30-2023 03:40 PM
Jessamine
American
22
10-19-2014 10:37 AM
duder
Compass Airlines
10
11-14-2013 04:20 PM
CAL EWR
Major
29
05-26-2009 09:36 AM
grumman
Major
7
10-31-2006 10:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices