Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
UL Pilot Recruitment Ad w/ DEI >

UL Pilot Recruitment Ad w/ DEI

Search
Notices

UL Pilot Recruitment Ad w/ DEI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-2024, 10:36 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Crj FO
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by luv757 View Post
If that had been the message from the word go this wouldn't be a discussion. The first thing that should have been said was nothing at all. Just go about the business of leaving no stone unturned in efforts to recruit the best possible candidates to become airline pilots. If there was absolutely a need to virtue signal to placate the SJW there absolutely should NOT have been any kind of number attached to whatever was said. As soon as a number was thrown out it became a quota. Even if that wasn't the intention, and I'm in the camp that is accepting of it wasn't meant to be, that number was percieved as one by enough people to make it one. And the message percieved is the message received. The evidence that the message percieved is 50% will be women and minorities is the numerous threads on this that keep popping up. The only thing that should have been said, if anything should have been said, should have been along the lines of "in an effort to make sure we aren't missing out on qualified candidates that may not have otherwise considered this as a viable career we are extending/enhancing our recruiting efforts amongst people that haven't traditionally considered this as a career but possess all the attributes we look for to become excellent pilots in the goal to make sure we are attracting all the top talent we can." The airplane doesn't care if a straight white male or minority LGBTQ non-binary is flying. The airplane will kill either the same if they don't know what they're doing. The airplane only cares that we have the right stuff. The message needed to be that United is seeking everyone with the right stuff. And that's it. But that message got bungled.
Agreed, anybody and everybody should be given the opportunity to pursue this career. But you gotta have the right stuff, not everyone is cut out for it. They pandered, and it’s gonna burn us because pandering is quickly falling out of public favor.
Stirrin is offline  
Old 01-19-2024, 11:17 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by C11DCA View Post
It's not about being "woke".

… and that means increasing the opportunity for those that haven't traditionally had that opportunity,

Completely fair statement to make. Why I remember 15 years ago I had some black college classmates and the first day our professor said “sorry folks, this job is for whites only.”

oh, wait, that didn’t happen. Actually it was the opposite. “If you’re not a straight white male, there is a pilot group you can join right now that will provide networking and scholarship opportunities.”

but please keep telling me that those poor minorities just haven’t had the opportunities that white men have had. This isn’t the 1960’s anymore, you want to do something with your life, do it.
Furloughedboi is offline  
Old 01-19-2024, 12:28 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by C11DCA View Post
It's not about being "woke".

It's about covering hiring needs for the next decade +, and that means increasing the opportunity for those that haven't traditionally had that opportunity, because there are not going to be enough average white guys to cover the needs.

The pilot pool should reflect what our society looks like. A long long way to go to even get somewhat close to that from where we have been historically.
The pilot pool should reflect what our society looks like? Says who, you? How many brick layers are female or Black? How many school teachers are male? How many nurses are male? How many roofers are female? How many auto mechanics are female? How many CPAs are male? How may flight attendants are male? Here's a little known secret: men and women aspire to different careers, jobs, occupations. Women now outnumber men in medical school. Is that fair? Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians all aspire to different occupations. Why don't you go tell them that they're doing the wrong work.

Hell, this world can't even define the term "woman" or the phrase "person of color." And BTW, what color? Does mixed race count? Barack Obama is always touted as the first Black American president. Why? Yes, his Kenyan father had very dark skin, but his mother was as White as Jill Biden.

Yes, 50% women and people of color. United very sneekily uses this metric because they don't have to break down what percentage will be female and what percentage will be their ever-so-vague person of color. Sickening.

- Octa
Octaflugaron is offline  
Old 01-19-2024, 12:37 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by AbjectFutility View Post
Which of your meritorious attributes were most important when you decided to pursue the piloting profession?
Absurd question/comment. Obviously, the right ones. Who are you to question that? You're probably that person who chirps, "I hope a woman or person of color never has to fly with you!" Right? You're a good little sophomore. Keep studying and good luck. Oh, don't forget to think and don't follow your college professors or the mob just because you think they're cool! Dangerous.

- Octa

Last edited by Octaflugaron; 01-19-2024 at 01:04 PM.
Octaflugaron is offline  
Old 01-19-2024, 12:48 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,316
Default

Airlines: Hire white male pilots at a 95% rate even though they represent only about 30% of the U.S. population.

White guys: “This is fair.”

Airlines: We’re going to attempt to recruit pilots more proportionately to the general population. In all reality, white males will continue to be over-represented both in numbers hired year over year & as a percentage of the total labor group, but the disparity will become slightly less glaring over time..

White guys: “Racism!!!”
hummingbear is offline  
Old 01-19-2024, 12:49 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by C11DCA View Post
It's not about being "woke".

It's about covering hiring needs for the next decade +, and that means increasing the opportunity for those that haven't traditionally had that opportunity, because there are not going to be enough average white guys to cover the needs.

The pilot pool should reflect what our society looks like. A long long way to go to even get somewhat close to that from where we have been historically.
"...and that means increasing the opportunity for those that haven't traditionally had that opportunity, because there are not going to be enough average white guys to cover the needs."

Average whites guys? We're not looking for "average white guys" we're looking for the best qualified, period. Who annointed you King? Do you get to decide how many women or Blacks or Hispanics or Asians will grace the cockpits of airliners going forward? We're not looking for "average white guys" to fill the cockpits. We're looking for the best qualified PEOPLE. Wow, such an uneducated and bigoted statement!
Octaflugaron is offline  
Old 01-19-2024, 01:01 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear View Post
Airlines: Hire white male pilots at a 95% rate even though they represent only about 30% of the U.S. population.

White guys: “This is fair.”

Airlines: We’re going to attempt to recruit pilots more proportionately to the general population. In all reality, white males will continue to be over-represented both in numbers hired year over year & as a percentage of the total labor group, but the disparity will become slightly less glaring over time..

White guys: “Racism!!!”
So, I guess that 50% of airline pilots will be female going forward. Get a clue. Men and women, Whites and Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, etc ALL aspire to different vocations, careers, jobs, occupations, and for many different reasons. People from different cultures and both sexes want different things in life. Get it? Are you saying that airlines discriminate against women because such a small percentage of airline pilots are female? Please.

- Octa Floooooog
Octaflugaron is offline  
Old 01-19-2024, 02:13 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 694
Default

Originally Posted by Octaflugaron View Post
Men and women, Whites and Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, etc ALL aspire to different vocations, careers, jobs, occupations, and for many different reasons. People from different cultures and both sexes want different things in life. Get it?

- Octa Floooooog
Oh. wow. Please do tell us ALL about those "many different reasons" why I can't seem to find one single female pilot who followed in her mom's and grandma's footsteps into commercial aviation - I wonder if one even exists. I mean pick any category you just mentioned and enlighten us as to what sort of reasons might have played a part in them "wanting different things in life".

We need excellent pilots. Expanding the pool to find them isn't a bad thing. And the pool has been historically very small and that's not really up for any sort of reasonable debate.
Chuck D is offline  
Old 01-19-2024, 03:15 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 414
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck D View Post
Oh. wow. Please do tell us ALL about those "many different reasons" why I can't seem to find one single female pilot who followed in her mom's and grandma's footsteps into commercial aviation - I wonder if one even exists. I mean pick any category you just mentioned and enlighten us as to what sort of reasons might have played a part in them "wanting different things in life".

We need excellent pilots. Expanding the pool to find them isn't a bad thing. And the pool has been historically very small and that's not really up for any sort of reasonable debate.
The reason the pool is small is because the barrier to entry is extremely high. Women, in mass will gladly go get themselves into massive debt for the humanities but most choose to stay far away from STEM. That is their choice. Most women are more interested in people and men are more interested in things. If you are a female and want to have kids one day this profession is, quite frankly, pretty stupid for the line stiff. Most male dominated jobs are not something women want to do. Did a crew of women build your house, run the electricity, lay the roads, install the plumbing, roof your house, prune the landscape, lay the brick, run the power grid, make the phone you text from, engineer the bridge you use every day???? Hell no! They willingly choose other professions. Nobody *****es about a representative labor pool for brick layers.
Nordhavn is offline  
Old 01-19-2024, 03:29 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck D View Post

We need excellent pilots. Expanding the pool to find them isn't a bad thing. And the pool has been historically very small and that's not really up for any sort of reasonable debate.
I agree with you here. However, if you hire somebody because they are a woman (or a man, for that matter) or because they have a certain skin color, that by definition is race and/or sex discrimination. I am all for casting our recruiting nets far and wide to capture the very best talent out there, regardless of race or sex. I am also in favor of recruiters going into areas of our country, and of the world, that have historically not been represented to educate AND encourage people about the ways to have careers in aviation. And that is where it must stop. Let the chips fall where they will. In order for United to achieve the goal of recruiting 50% women and POC into our pilot ranks, it would necessarily require (currently) not taking better qualified White men. That is a fact. That would be wrong. Even to suggest that we consider those metrics is against what true champions of equality want. We want fairness, period. Equality of opportunity; nothing more, nothing less. United's stated goals are the purist form of racism and sexism. Furthermore, initiatives like this do much more to divide the people of United than will ever unite them. Very sad, indeed.

- Octa
Octaflugaron is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sloneckozzz
Envoy Airlines
48
03-15-2018 06:52 AM
bbymse
Mesa Airlines
3
01-28-2018 05:54 PM
mach80guy
American
8
08-12-2014 05:13 PM
DWN3GRN
Foreign
2
09-14-2008 08:12 AM
BAPilot
Regional
11
10-26-2006 09:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices