Search

Notices

Cheap Planes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2024 | 09:34 AM
  #11  
CLazarus's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 976
Likes: 75
From: NOYB
Default

Originally Posted by Swakid8
Looking back without hindsight 20/20, picking up cheap new frames and even white-tails on the cheap was and still is a very smart play…
Agree strongly with this. We got ourselves at the front of the line for both NB and WB aircraft with what were undoubtedly smoking hot deals. Now other carriers are being forced to wait behind us for their own replacement needs, which are going to prevent them from growing much anytime soon (ex. SWA). We'd be in much more serious trouble if we didn't get to the front of the line, as we'd be choking trying to fly all those RJs we've been able to park so far.

Strangely enough, I'm kind of glad deliveries have slowed down because I'm not so sure we could absorb that many airplanes that fast. We are probably paying a premium now for the extra 321s we are getting... but the extra compensation we are likely getting from Boeing probably mitigates a lot of it. And the 321 is going to be a much better airplane for premium transcon service than the Max-10.
Reply
Old 06-05-2024 | 09:43 AM
  #12  
line slug
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 7
From: B787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by CLazarus
I'm kind of glad deliveries have slowed down because I'm not so sure we could absorb that many airplanes that fast.
100% agree.
Reply
Old 06-05-2024 | 11:30 AM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 741
Likes: 40
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
You seriously believe it was the pilots' fault? I can almost guarantee that the result would have been the same here before all the training emphasis post accidents.
You either didn't read the accounts of the 2 crashes or have no idea what you are talking about. One incident flew for 6 minutes while the captain retrimmed 33 times. Then gave the airplane to a 250hr pilot and never said he retrimmed once. The second one was left at takeoff power until it hit the ground more then 2 minutes later. Every us pilot on the 737 was trained on trim runaway. Turn 2 switches off if that big huge wheel that hits you in the knee all the time is moving uncommanded.
Reply
Old 06-05-2024 | 12:02 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 465
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
You either didn't read the accounts of the 2 crashes or have no idea what you are talking about. One incident flew for 6 minutes while the captain retrimmed 33 times. Then gave the airplane to a 250hr pilot and never said he retrimmed once. The second one was left at takeoff power until it hit the ground more then 2 minutes later. Every us pilot on the 737 was trained on trim runaway. Turn 2 switches off if that big huge wheel that hits you in the knee all the time is moving uncommanded.
Yeah, I'd love to see you with no prior knowledge diagnose what was going on as your FO is flying shortly after take off, your airspeed indications are totally whack, clacker blaring, all kinds of noises and distractions going off. Have you tried to manually trim a 737 once it's out of trim, you really have to push the nose down to unload the tail..which would be extremely difficult for anyone to do so low to the ground and with such little time to figure out what was happening. The first incident okay, I think most of us wouldn't have crashed that one.
Reply
Old 06-05-2024 | 01:05 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 234
Likes: 23
From: Cramped 737 Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Yeah, I'd love to see you with no prior knowledge diagnose what was going on as your FO is flying shortly after take off, your airspeed indications are totally whack, clacker blaring, all kinds of noises and distractions going off. Have you tried to manually trim a 737 once it's out of trim, you really have to push the nose down to unload the tail..which would be extremely difficult for anyone to do so low to the ground and with such little time to figure out what was happening. The first incident okay, I think most of us wouldn't have crashed that one.
You don’t have to manually trim an Airbus. Just sayin’!! ;-P
Reply
Old 06-05-2024 | 01:41 PM
  #16  
WaterRooster's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 961
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Yeah, I'd love to see you with no prior knowledge diagnose what was going on as your FO is flying shortly after take off, your airspeed indications are totally whack, clacker blaring, all kinds of noises and distractions going off. Have you tried to manually trim a 737 once it's out of trim, you really have to push the nose down to unload the tail..which would be extremely difficult for anyone to do so low to the ground and with such little time to figure out what was happening. The first incident okay, I think most of us wouldn't have crashed that one.
You know there were incidents in the United States prior to those crashes, right? Notice that none of them crashed and killed people? The US pilots turned the system off and left it off like we are taught with most problems, turn off the systems and fly the airplane till you figure it out. Do pilot ****. So YES, these was a blame on Boeing but the pilots are the ones who flew it into the ground when trying to turn the systems back on.
Reply
Old 06-05-2024 | 01:42 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 188
Default

Originally Posted by JackReacher
You don’t have to manually trim an Airbus. Just sayin’!! ;-P
Unless you lose the AOA probes.
Reply
Old 06-05-2024 | 01:43 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,509
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by 744ButtonPusher
Boeing didn’t put anything into the dirt .. poor pilot training by two carriers and a faulty design and implementation by of a system by Boeing put aircraft into the dirt.
At the time Ethiopia was one of four airlines in the world that had a Max simulator, and those pilots did everything right, the way Boeing told them.

The airplane is a POS, and Boeings own testing, documentation, and internal correspondence prove that they knew.

Try again.
Reply
Old 06-05-2024 | 01:44 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 188
Default

Originally Posted by WaterRooster
You know there were incidents in the United States prior to those crashes, right? Notice that none of them crashed and killed people? The US pilots turned the system off and left it off like we are taught with most problems, turn off the systems and fly the airplane till you figure it out. Do pilot ****. So YES, these was a blame on Boeing but the pilots are the ones who flew it into the ground when trying to turn the systems back on.
The first crash had the same issues the day prior. The crew followed procedures and flew it to their planned destination.
Reply
Old 06-05-2024 | 01:53 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by WaterRooster
You know there were incidents in the United States prior to those crashes, right? Notice that none of them crashed and killed people? The US pilots turned the system off and left it off like we are taught with most problems, turn off the systems and fly the airplane till you figure it out. Do pilot ****. So YES, these was a blame on Boeing but the pilots are the ones who flew it into the ground when trying to turn the systems back on.
not showing any MCAS issues reported in the FAA SDR system. Which airlines had MCAS activations due to AOA vane failures?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wannabepilot
Corporate
43
12-01-2008 05:22 AM
vagabond
Major
4
11-19-2008 02:22 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
6
01-07-2008 01:44 PM
Was That For Us?
Major
0
10-20-2005 09:55 PM
Sir James
Major
1
10-09-2005 06:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices