Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United class action suit.. >

United class action suit..

Search

Notices

United class action suit..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2024 | 02:40 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude86
I thought the $450K per person seemed crazy until this came out yesterday...
https://sjvsun.com/u-s/woman-gets-70...id-19-vaccine/

Nearly $700k total. $177k in back pay. $500k in punitive damages.

“….despite her appeal and explanation that her job did not include regular contact with people.”

Big difference.

Old 07-03-2024 | 03:34 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
“….despite her appeal and explanation that her job did not include regular contact with people.”

Big difference.
I agree, but a religious accommodation isn't granted based on what your specific job is or who you interact with. United still had to provide a "reasonable accommodation". Taking away pay and all benefits isn't reasonable just because you work around people. The article's lawsuit wasn't awarded based on her not being a threat to other people. It was awarded on being denied a religious accommodation.

Even if being around people plays a factor in the United case... I'm willing to bet part of the argument will be that Kirby will have to prove his mandate improved the lives of passengers and co-workers. None of the other airlines had such a mandate and they were just fine. United is the outlier here. IMO, the only argument Kirby has is that he was just trying to be safe and going by expert opinion at the time. That's all well and fair except that in January 2022, the vaccine manufacturer's own CEO publicly stated "the first two doses had little effect, if any." Kirby still kept the two dose mandate in place for another 3 or 4 months after that.
Old 07-03-2024 | 08:18 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude86
I agree, but a religious accommodation isn't granted based on what your specific job is or who you interact with. United still had to provide a "reasonable accommodation". Taking away pay and all benefits isn't reasonable just because you work around people. The article's lawsuit wasn't awarded based on her not being a threat to other people. It was awarded on being denied a religious accommodation.

Even if being around people plays a factor in the United case... I'm willing to bet part of the argument will be that Kirby will have to prove his mandate improved the lives of passengers and co-workers. None of the other airlines had such a mandate and they were just fine. United is the outlier here. IMO, the only argument Kirby has is that he was just trying to be safe and going by expert opinion at the time. That's all well and fair except that in January 2022, the vaccine manufacturer's own CEO publicly stated "the first two doses had little effect, if any." Kirby still kept the two dose mandate in place for another 3 or 4 months after that.
I was under the impression the excuse was "to reduce transmission". I don't think the vaccines did that, at all. They reduced symptoms, some of the time, in at-risk populations.

Last edited by AntiPeter; 07-03-2024 at 08:34 AM.
Old 07-03-2024 | 12:37 PM
  #14  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 140
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by AntiPeter
I was under the impression the excuse was "to reduce transmission". I don't think the vaccines did that, at all. They reduced symptoms, some of the time, in at-risk populations.
The vaccine reduced viral load and symptoms for virtually all populations. This virus is airborne and is largely spread through symptoms - sneezing and coughing. Reducing symptoms and viral load thus reduced the spread of the virus.

This isn't up for debate or even hair-splitting - it's just the truth. A very simple one. There are a great many opinions about the vaccine itself and associated policy, but how the vaccine worked isn't a mystery at all.
Old 07-03-2024 | 01:50 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by JFS 3
The vaccine reduced viral load and symptoms for virtually all populations. This virus is airborne and is largely spread through symptoms - sneezing and coughing. Reducing symptoms and viral load thus reduced the spread of the virus.

This isn't up for debate or even hair-splitting - it's just the truth. A very simple one. There are a great many opinions about the vaccine itself and associated policy, but how the vaccine worked isn't a mystery at all.
https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o298

Vaccines aren’t preventing onward transmission by reducing the viral load—or amount of SARS-CoV-2—in your body.

Old 07-03-2024 | 01:58 PM
  #16  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 226
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

"The first weekly covid-19 vaccine surveillance report for 20221 from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) was more positive than Bauld’s assessment—but didn’t say outright that covid-19 vaccines prevent transmission. “Several studies have provided evidence that vaccines are effective at preventing infection,” it states, “Uninfected people cannot transmit; therefore, the vaccines are also effective at preventing transmission.”

A study2 of covid-19 transmission within English households using data gathered in early 2021 found that even a single dose of a covid-19 vaccine reduced the likelihood of household transmission by 40-50%. This was supported by a study of household transmission among Scottish healthcare workers conducted between December 2020 and March 2021.3 Both studies analysed the impact of vaccination on transmission of the α variant of SARS-CoV-2, which was dominant at the time.

Vaccines aren’t preventing onward transmission by reducing the viral load—or amount of SARS-CoV-2—in your body. “Most studies show if you got an infection after vaccination, compared with someone who got an infection without a vaccine, you were pretty much shedding roughly the same amount of virus,” says Paul Hunter, professor in medicine at the University of East Anglia. One study,5 sponsored by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), found “no difference in infectious virus titer between groups” who had been vaccinated and had not.

Instead, it’s the principle that the UKHSA identified above: if you don’t get infected in the first place thanks to a vaccine, you can’t spread it. Once you’re infected, you still can—although what we know about the window when you’re most likely to transmit the virus to others has improved"

Maybe read what you quote?
Yes, people that got infected despite being getting the vacine were just as contagious. But a lot of people did not get infected because they got the vacine, and thus reduced the spread. Pretty straightforward.
Old 07-03-2024 | 02:22 PM
  #17  
ClappedOut145's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 70
From: AOG
Default

Originally Posted by worstpilotever
Im no lawyer, but being granted class action status is a long way from winning a billion dollar settlement.

“I’ve never seen anything this big,” Sherry Walker. Im sure she hasn't.

Great. She’s already arrogant enough over her husbands battle star and now she’ll be even more insufferable. Glad I’m not IAH based and dealing with her.
Old 07-03-2024 | 02:25 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 52
From: Head pillow fluffer, Assistant bed maker
Default

always fun to revive the pilots pretending to be doctors threads.
Old 07-03-2024 | 02:33 PM
  #19  
weekends off? Nope...
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 134
Default

Originally Posted by AntiPeter
Kirby seems to be a liability when it comes to profit sharing checks (and among other things, perhaps).
We'll trade ya for Bob Jordan!!!
Old 07-03-2024 | 06:59 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 116
Default

Originally Posted by worstpilotever
always fun to revive the pilots pretending to be doctors threads.
What do you expect? We live in a world where you can pretend to be something you're not and then expect everyone else to pretend as well.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iahflyr
United
21
05-25-2023 06:21 PM
iahflyr
United
0
08-02-2018 08:58 AM
mike734
Money Talk
2
05-30-2012 08:23 PM
HSLD
United
19
09-20-2010 04:47 AM
Lbell911
Major
29
07-31-2007 05:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices