More ORD gates for United
#91
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 153
From: 787 FO
I might not describe it as hilarious, but it is pretty obvious both airlines airlines are over scheduling for next year's gate reallotment. I do think AA will get a couple or so gates back from someone next year.
#92
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 638
Likes: 12
conversely AA gets judged as though they never had the 4 gates they are using, but DO actually get to use them for 9 months.
Of course 2026 into 2027 that whole dynamic reverses. It’s almost guaranteed to ping pong back and forth for a while. Long term it might make sense and give a good allocation, but it seems like some more thought could have gone into the year to year allocation.
#93
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 353
Here's an analogy. If I gave you a 6 sided dice and told you that if you rolled a 1 or 2 you would have to give me $1M but if you rolled a 3, 4, 5 or 6 I'd give you $1M. You only get one roll. Would you roll it? What if It was the same $1M each roll but you get to roll it 10 times? Now would you do it? Odds are you'd win either way. But many people are more afraid to lose the $1M than to win it, even though it makes a lot of sense to roll it.
Kirby has been watching and understanding the industry for years. In numerous interviews he's used the phrase "I've never understood why..." and then explained what other airlines have done that didn't make sense to him. He's not a risk taker. He's seeing areas where the odds are in his favor and he's going after those. He knows we won't win them all, but so far, we have won many more than we have lost and he's going to continue doing this.
I don't think Kirby has any particular disdain for labor groups, despite what is starting to emerge on this thread. He's in this to maximize opportunity for himself and his family just like all of us are. Fortunately he's taken a growth path that's greatly affected us in a positive way. More faster upgrades, more flying opportunities and more profit sharing. I don't believe for one second we would be on the other end of this if the economic landscape changed in a substantial way.
To Joepilot's original statement, Kirby isn't a "visionary". He's rolling the dice over and over because he's seeing an advantage in our network that other airlines don't have and he's exploiting it.
#94
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 353
AA is almost guaranteed to get some gates back next year because the allocation scheme seems pretty flawed in the short term. Next spring they are going to look at the total average usage for full year 2025 based on the gate allocation effective Dec 25. That means UAL only has 3 months to use the extra gates but get judged as though they had them the full 12 months.
conversely AA gets judged as though they never had the 4 gates they are using, but DO actually get to use them for 9 months.
Of course 2026 into 2027 that whole dynamic reverses. It’s almost guaranteed to ping pong back and forth for a while. Long term it might make sense and give a good allocation, but it seems like some more thought could have gone into the year to year allocation.
conversely AA gets judged as though they never had the 4 gates they are using, but DO actually get to use them for 9 months.
Of course 2026 into 2027 that whole dynamic reverses. It’s almost guaranteed to ping pong back and forth for a while. Long term it might make sense and give a good allocation, but it seems like some more thought could have gone into the year to year allocation.
#95
Yep I remember that threat( was working for a UAX carrier at the time).
I am not trying to throw shade at Kirby as I said, he is a very smart and capable person. Munoz while not knowing the industry, made a brilliant move in poaching him from AA. Hence why I credit Munoz for where UAL is at. He eventually got the right people in the right positions to take UAL where it is at now. Kirby isn't doing anything drastic, risky per se, or visionary. He saw the strength's/potential in UAL's network and is fully exploiting it. He would likely not do what he is doing now at UAL if he stayed to take over AA.
I am not trying to throw shade at Kirby as I said, he is a very smart and capable person. Munoz while not knowing the industry, made a brilliant move in poaching him from AA. Hence why I credit Munoz for where UAL is at. He eventually got the right people in the right positions to take UAL where it is at now. Kirby isn't doing anything drastic, risky per se, or visionary. He saw the strength's/potential in UAL's network and is fully exploiting it. He would likely not do what he is doing now at UAL if he stayed to take over AA.
#97
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,633
Likes: 209
#98
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 985
Likes: 65
I’ve found one truth in all that I’ve read on the forum about Kirby. He screwed AA pilots when he was at American and he screws AA pilots now that he’s CEO of United. What did you guys at AA do to him😄
Last edited by jdt30; 10-04-2025 at 04:19 PM.
#99
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,118
Likes: 293
It's often the question, but I don't think he would have changed AA's direction much if he was selected over Isom. Not saying Kirby is bad as he has shown to be a capable leader, but he isn't the visonary his rep makes him out to be. He just recognizes the strengths of UAL and AA and he is good at exploiting them. He wouldn't have made AA into this international powerhouse as it isn't AA's strength as much as AA pilots would want that.
Don't get me wrong, AA doesn't need any help going for 8th but a high up executive like Kirby with everything they knew about AA going to a strong competitor doesn't help.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





