Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United struck a light pole >

United struck a light pole

Search

Notices

United struck a light pole

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2026 | 02:24 PM
  #141  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 844
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by 11atsomto
I understand you are from WN?

I'm not sure I understand your question
He's saying he doesn’t like landing on short runways, but at SWA at least they get more repetition that landing on them becomes more normalized and practiced

However, folks that fly heavies may only get a few landings a month. Of those, only a fraction may occur on runways less than 7,000’. Due to the lack of practice (confidence), perhaps the nerves get the brain to deviate from standard and dip a little low, not fully processing the ramifications of those actions.

I added the last part. But that’s what I think he’s getting at.
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 02:31 PM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,523
Likes: 122
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer;[url=tel:4032435
4032435[/url]]Just goes to show you how tight that approach actually is. It’s bad enough on a NB, I can only imagine a WB. It was bounce to happen
30* AOB @ 145kts gives you the same size turn circle whether your plane weighs 100k lbs or 500k lbs. I’ve flown the circle to 29 in every plane UAL has in the inventory. If you follow the procedures it’s the same every time, the Airbus just calls you a “retard” when you’re doing it.


Originally Posted by Rseat;[url=tel:4032737
4032737[/url]]I’ll never get used to landing on shorter than normal runways. I’ve been around the block, but those type of landing never cease to make the heart rate go up.

We have our own challenging airports here at Cowboys Airways. Nothing makes me happier (sarcasm) than landing in MDW, gusty winds, heavy, and a wet runway on an 800 or MAX! We require flaps 40, max autobrakes, with the probility of overspeeding the flaps probably greater than 70%. Fun fun..

But, we do this all the time. After all, there’s no way our crew planners would EVER let us fly just one or two legs per day. So we get a lot of repetition. Which begs the question, do heavy guys/gals get the same in your neck of the woods? Could this be a factor? I truly don’t know and simply speculating..
Ever landed a 739 in SJO when it’s wet? 12k’(?) of runway and at auto brakes max you need almost all of it. The length of the runway is only half the equation, and 6700’ (or whatever 29 is), is well within the capabilities of the 764, or any WB I’ve flown.
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 04:28 PM
  #143  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 158
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
30* AOB @ 145kts gives you the same size turn circle whether your plane weighs 100k lbs or 500k lbs. I’ve flown the circle to 29 in every plane UAL has in the inventory. If you follow the procedures it’s the same every time, the Airbus just calls you a “retard” when.
‘Tight’ was referencing the Air Canada 787 landing on 29 that looked like it barely cleared the light pole and a truck. Either they were low as well, or there is absolutely no room for being low on 29 for a widebody. Apparently the FAA was doing some tests on 29 today.
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 05:06 PM
  #144  
off weekends (if Reserve)
 
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 113
Default

Originally Posted by flypanam
apparently the faa was doing some tests on 29 today.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 👏👏👏👏
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 05:09 PM
  #145  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 94
Likes: 26
Default

You know you can divert right? Why are people landing on bread trucks and hitting light poles. That’s the real problem here, failure was starting the approach.
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 06:45 PM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 138
Default

Originally Posted by meahPilot
You know you can divert right? Why are people landing on bread trucks and hitting light poles. That’s the real problem here, failure was starting the approach.
But they did. Entirely consistent with countless other similar, ordinary clearances. Guidelines for abandoning approaches are published in every operator’s approved flight manual. Outside the slot as defined, go. No harm no foul.

Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 06:56 PM
  #147  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 269
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by JoeBlo
What in the DEi is going on.....

Maybe less emphasis on gender and sexual orientation and more emphasis on flying the airplane...

The crew is all male caucasion.
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 07:32 PM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 99
Default

Originally Posted by OFFCOURSE
The crew is all male caucasion.
But how many homeless shelter soup kitchen and kitten rescue merit badges did they have?
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 07:40 PM
  #149  
ugleeual's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 61
From: 767/757 CA
Default

Originally Posted by meahPilot
You know you can divert right? Why are people landing on bread trucks and hitting light poles. That’s the real problem here, failure was starting the approach.
‘just because ATC clears you doesn’t mean you have to accept it… just say “unable 29” and they’ll give you 04/22… simple. It’s not worth the risk on a WB after a long flight.
Reply
Old 05-06-2026 | 08:00 PM
  #150  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 106
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by OFFCOURSE
The crew is all male caucasion.

Hearsay, unnecessary, and goes against company policy. Good job dipsh1t. See ya at a random subway
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jerryleber
United
28
02-10-2025 10:50 AM
Boeing Aviator
=> United Contract 2022
16
08-27-2022 07:19 AM
Crawl
CommuteAir
5416
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
APC225
United
24
11-27-2013 05:49 AM
Freight Dog
Money Talk
20
11-08-2011 01:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices