Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Flight time NPRM and UA/CO >

Flight time NPRM and UA/CO

Search
Notices

Flight time NPRM and UA/CO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2010, 03:32 PM
  #11  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by HSLD View Post
Few organized airlines currently work to FARs, why would UAL/CAL start now?
Because these are entirely new FARs, not 60 years old, created with direct ALPA involvement.
bfull is offline  
Old 09-15-2010, 04:04 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 400
Default Net effect?

So what is everyones opinion on the net effect of the NPRM as it stands as far as a percentage of new crew required?

4-7% has been tossed about for pax carriers. A UPS bud said their union said only 3-4% for them due to
Available manpower. A reliable source at FedEx says they'll be hiring hard core of it goes through.

So how about UNICAL? 5%? Not barring any almost certain help in JCBA?
dvhighdrive88 is offline  
Old 09-15-2010, 05:10 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SUPERfluf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 110
Default

Originally Posted by dvhighdrive88 View Post
So what is everyones opinion on the net effect of the NPRM as it stands as far as a percentage of new crew required?

4-7% has been tossed about for pax carriers. A UPS bud said their union said only 3-4% for them due to
Available manpower. A reliable source at FedEx says they'll be hiring hard core of it goes through.

So how about UNICAL? 5%? Not barring any almost certain help in JCBA?
No idea. The MEC's are analyzing it as we speak.

CAL has protections to keep IRO's via the CBA where they might not be required on some of the "shorter" oceanic flights with these new rest rules. Other than that, at first glance it looks like a wash to me. We'll see what the MEC's have to say after they crunch the numbers.
SUPERfluf is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 05:44 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,887
Default

Originally Posted by dvhighdrive88 View Post
So what is everyones opinion on the net effect of the NPRM as it stands as far as a percentage of new crew required?

4-7% has been tossed about for pax carriers. A UPS bud said their union said only 3-4% for them due to
Available manpower. A reliable source at FedEx says they'll be hiring hard core of it goes through.

So how about UNICAL? 5%? Not barring any almost certain help in JCBA?
I think it will be about neutral when it is all said and done. Maybe I am wrong and 2012 will have "the best staffed summer ever" at UNICAL.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 09:13 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by HSLD View Post
I'd suggest that you're wrong, not in interpreting the charts, but assuming a JCBA will have the new United working to FAR. Few organized airlines currently work to FARs, why would UAL/CAL start now? Work rules are the pad between the FARs and current quality of life and as you point out; a JCBA must show marked improvements.

As has always been the case, you get what you negotiate and if UAL/CAL pilots view the NPRM as the starting point instead of the current contract.....we're screwed.
Agreed that the JCBA won't have us working to FAR's, BUT if the rule as finally passed allows UAL/CAL to fly 2 pilot returns from Europe, its going to cost us negotiating capital to keep the bunkie... capital I'd much rather spend on Scope.
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 09:16 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by dvhighdrive88 View Post
So what is everyones opinion on the net effect of the NPRM as it stands as far as a percentage of new crew required?

4-7% has been tossed about for pax carriers. A UPS bud said their union said only 3-4% for them due to
Available manpower. A reliable source at FedEx says they'll be hiring hard core of it goes through.

So how about UNICAL? 5%? Not barring any almost certain help in JCBA?
You've got to separate regionals and majors. The net effect at most majors will probably be flat, to negative (depending on how the bunkie scene plays out). The regionals are going to have to increase staffing... especially those that fly small turboprops 6-10 legs a day.
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 10:09 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped View Post
Agreed that the JCBA won't have us working to FAR's, BUT if the rule as finally passed allows UAL/CAL to fly 2 pilot returns from Europe, its going to cost us negotiating capital to keep the bunkie... capital I'd much rather spend on Scope.
Exactly. This NPRM will cost of something. Either directly with the wages we might give up to keep the relief pilots or the jobs sacrificed by the NPRM.

HSLD,

I thought the CAL contract was effectively FAR's. There were no limitations versus the UAL contract for flight/duty days. Again, this will be something we either pay for or we lose. But it is another chip in the company basket when it comes to leverage.

Need we also say that this POS NPRM is ALPA Endorsed! Those tool bags running ALPA are complete morons. It is high time to remove ALPA as our voice at the major airline level. They are nothing more than shills for the RJ pilots and don't have one concern about the legacy pilots, except for those golden dues dollars. We need to cut the cord, put Judas Prater and Paul Rice-a-roni on the street. Let them go try to find 500K a year jobs where they actually have to do something and are held accountable for their actions. As it stands now they get THEIRS at OUR expense.

L
Lambourne is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 11:46 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

Earlier poster, about 6 mos ago, said CAL mgmt had already planned that they would need to hire more when the rules came out...it was posted in the 6-10% range.
atpcliff is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 03:55 PM
  #19  
Smells like teen spirit
 
scrapdog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Mil and Civ
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff View Post
Earlier poster, about 6 mos ago, said CAL mgmt had already planned that they would need to hire more when the rules came out...it was posted in the 6-10% range.
Yeah cliff - I'll be sure to walk your stuff into the chief pilot.
scrapdog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices