Search

Notices

SLI consideration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2010 | 05:28 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
New Hire
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default SLI consideration

Years prior to TWA going belly-up some of their aircraft paid more than AMR's for the same equipment.

The higher "past pay" didn't change TWA's career expectations.

I doubt "past pay" will be considered in this SLI.
Reply
Old 11-05-2010 | 09:51 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default

How much are those TWA guys makin now? At least the one's still at AMR?
Reply
Old 11-05-2010 | 09:59 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GoinPolar
Years prior to TWA going belly-up some of their aircraft paid more than AMR's for the same equipment.
Maybe, however, that wasn't true at the time of the prepackaged BK/Acquisition.

I doubt "past pay" will be considered in this SLI.
You might be right, but there are few similarities between AA/TWA and this SLI.
Reply
Old 11-05-2010 | 11:07 AM
  #4  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: CAL
Default

Originally Posted by GoinPolar
Years prior to TWA going belly-up some of their aircraft paid more than AMR's for the same equipment.

The higher "past pay" didn't change TWA's career expectations.

I doubt "past pay" will be considered in this SLI.
Straws anyone?

MW
Reply
Old 11-05-2010 | 11:24 AM
  #5  
SoCalGuy's Avatar
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Default

I still am in favor of the height ratio, IE "Tallest ----> Shortest" in sorting out this SLI discussion. Not cool with that?? How about "A - Z" when it comes to last names.

Either works for me.
Reply
Old 11-05-2010 | 11:58 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: Le Bus
Default

What we have here is a stalemate...and standoff over pay/equipment with neither side appearing willing to budge. Keep it simple...ala UPS. Works for me. (same dollar amount!)

Now, about that pesky SLI.
Reply
Old 11-05-2010 | 12:58 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default

I was hoping to simply have the arbitrator designate a random number generator to decide seniority.

I'm down with the height ratio as long as it's shortest to highest, and adjusted for female/male differences when related to the mean avg. when measured against all pilots on the seniority list.

Or we could do it the way the MECs are going about it, an honest to goodness ****ing contest, where velocity and volume get points.
Reply
Old 11-05-2010 | 01:00 PM
  #8  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: UAL Furloughed
Default

What I find incredibly sad is that our two pilot groups are fighting over potential SLI considerations. This is OUR, both UAL and CO, pilot's opportunity to achieve an industry leading contract. One that would give industry leading pay, work rules for quality of life, and stop the contracting out of our flying bringing all furloughees back.

Instead, our unions prolong the negioations and allow our rights to erode. SkyWest will soon be doing 70 RJ flying out of Houston. Negioating capital will be spend trying to reclaim this. Everyday an aircraft moves at our substandard pay, the new company saves money. Our poor workrules allow the company to work us an additional day or two a month. There are over a thousand pilots at UAL working a career outside of their choosen profession.

All the drama needs to stop and we need an industry leading contract now regardless of SLI considerations. The SLI will go to arbitation and if done correctly, everyone will be mad anyway.
Reply
Old 11-05-2010 | 04:00 PM
  #9  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by UAL4LOW Stink
I was hoping to simply have the arbitrator designate a random number generator to decide seniority.

I'm down with the height ratio as long as it's shortest to highest, and adjusted for female/male differences when related to the mean avg. when measured against all pilots on the seniority list.

Or we could do it the way the MECs are going about it, an honest to goodness ****ing contest, where velocity and volume get points.

Just out of curiosity...how did CAL determine seniority within the new hire classes? Was it by age or some other assinine method like last 4 of your social?
Reply
Old 11-05-2010 | 04:27 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default

I'm not a CAL pilot, but their class seniority is by age, hence the junior guy in class wears a baby pacifier, their version of the 8-ball.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aloha
Regional
75
06-12-2010 06:15 PM
Myboyblue
Mergers and Acquisitions
8
04-29-2010 07:39 AM
NWA320pilot
Mergers and Acquisitions
43
11-15-2008 05:59 PM
Rotorhead
Mergers and Acquisitions
90
08-08-2008 02:22 AM
sailingfun
Mergers and Acquisitions
27
04-18-2008 08:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices