Search
Notices

Ipad efb

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2011, 10:42 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FurloughedX2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Line Pilot
Posts: 142
Default

I think the IPad haters think the company should take care of the employees first and foremost by giving us a decent contract, and then worry about ipads and paint. After the last decade and all we've been through, I get it. However, I flew a corporate gig during my 1st furlough that used efb's that were fairly large and cumbersome compared to the IPad. They still ROCKED! When I went back to UAL and had to carry a flight bag and do Jepp revisions, I wanted to shoot myself.
I am impressed that the company is willing to get with the 21st century and provide a sleek, light efb platform. It's about f-ing time. And, if it saves the company money in the long run, that may help our plight for a real pay-scale. Just my opinion, FWIW.
Will we be able to view FOM's and AFM's on the IPads too? Or just Jepp charts?
FurloughedX2 is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 11:09 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by FurloughedX2 View Post
Will we be able to view FOM's and AFM's on the IPads too? Or just Jepp charts?
My understanding is that the reverse will be the case to start. FOM and AFM will be loaded and we will be able to immediately stop carrying the hard copies. Jepps will come later as FAA hasn't approved their use without a constant power source. However, CAL is going to shipset Jepps vice individual sets, so that will help.
APC225 is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 11:25 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by FurloughedX2 View Post
I think the IPad haters think the company should take care of the employees first and foremost by giving us a decent contract, and then worry about ipads and paint. After the last decade and all we've been through, I get it. However, I flew a corporate gig during my 1st furlough that used efb's that were fairly large and cumbersome compared to the IPad. They still ROCKED! When I went back to UAL and had to carry a flight bag and do Jepp revisions, I wanted to shoot myself.
The company is spinning this into publicity about being modern and eco-friendly. In negotiations they're stalling while hundreds of millions of dollars continue to go from our pockets to theirs.

I think the unions should direct that no pilot sign for an iPad until "safety-related issues are worked out regarding the training and implementation of this technology." Let them sit in a warehouse and let the company suffer the negative publicity of not thinking the issue through, just like their train-by-bulletin and staff-by-junior man practices.

I agree that doing revisions is about the most pointless exercise out there, but what is more frustrating is knowing every paycheck is a lot less than it ought to be. It feels like I'm paying the company each month.

They made a half billion dollars. They're upgrading the fleet and refurbishing terminals at a price of nearly two billion. But they can't discuss our scheduling section with us in a rational way?

IPads are a welcome relief. So is a little sunshine to a hostage, but they're still a hostage.

Last edited by APC225; 08-25-2011 at 07:21 PM.
APC225 is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 03:33 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Guppy Capt.
Posts: 1,887
Default

"I spent several years flying a plane that was totally paperless, which included the use of iPads."

wrxpilot- what do you mean by "several years". And are you including iPads in that time?
Short Bus Drive is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 04:10 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
A320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: 787 Capt.
Posts: 638
Default

They may as well give away the 11000 tasers they have stored as well



Regarding the iPad. You can always turn it off
A320 is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 04:52 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FurloughedX2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Line Pilot
Posts: 142
Default

Originally Posted by APC225 View Post

IPads are a welcome relief. So is a little sunshine to a hostage, but they're still a hostage.
I hear ya, APC, I am no Marvin Mainliner. You guys that are on property can put your collective feet down and tell the company "no thanks" We'll have the contract first please.
On the outside looking in, it seemed like a good thing. Perhaps if they would have done it years ago, and not under the current circumstances and under the pretense of being all green and eco-friendly when so many of us are hurting . It is BS, they should deal with the big picture first.....take care of the employees. Period, the end.
FurloughedX2 is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 05:49 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Default

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive View Post
"I spent several years flying a plane that was totally paperless, which included the use of iPads."

wrxpilot- what do you mean by "several years". And are you including iPads in that time?
A little under three years. It was a CJ3 with ProLine 21 (with charts displayed on the IFIS), and included the use of iPads. Though we implemented the iPads during the last year I was there, and I had about 12 months of using it as a backup for our charts and manuals. This was all part 91.
wrxpilot is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 05:59 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped View Post
The SJS Moniker was thrown in there because your first post indicated that not being excited about the Shiny New Toy means that we are whining sniveling idiots. Shiny New Toy Syndrome goes hand in hand with Shiny New Jet Syndrome.

Just because one flies the Bro doesn't mean one don't have SJS. You next post seems to indicate that you "get it", so I will retract the SJS.

Here's the thing though... As an EMB-120 FO, who is new to the airline side of the industry (sounds like you flew corporate), you should be careful making statements about what kind of attitudes the guys with the experience should have. Since there isn't a pilot on the property right now with less than about 12 years, everyone that was leaving a comment has experience. I wouldn't go over to the corporate section and start spouting off to those folks about what their attitude should be, as I have very limited corporate experience. I figure they know their issues best.

You think we are paranoid? Buddy... you have no idea. The company was videoing/recording our conversations in ops for years before we found out. Our Management is reading this conversation (Hi guys!!!). And trust me, they WILL use the iPads to track our movements, compare it to sick list usage etc. If you work for United, and you AREN'T paranoid, you are stupid.

Another correction to your assessment. The iPad is nothing but an inconvenience for me without Wifi installed in the airplane. Right now, with Shipsets, I have nothing that I need to carry. Now I've got to carry another iPad. I have my own, which I will continue to use, so now I'm going to be dragging around 2 of them. And what information does it give me that I don't already have? Zero. What happens if I lose it? Break it? You think the company is going to pat me on the head and say "That's ok, we'll just get you another one?" HELL no they won't. It will come out of my paycheck! Paperless is all fine and good, but how hard is it for me to open up a book and find a chart? Like I said in the first post, if they put Wifi in all the jets, then that is a completely different story. If I had access to real time weather, moving map taxi charts, etc. etc., then THAT would make it a very valuable resource. But we don't, and apparently aren't going to considering they just announced they are going to spend $500 million in cabin upgrades, and WIFI on the UAL airplanes that don't have it wasn't in the announcement.

Right about now you are rolling your eyes and thinking you know how I should feel. Put another 20 years in and then come talk to me. You'll see. In the meantime, you can keep your snotty comments to the regional board. They might go over better there.
Sorry if you feel that I don't have anything to contribute here, so I'll go ahead and stay out of this area from now on. But before I bow out, I'll just say this:

No offense was intended, and I'm sorry if you feel that way. But I really do think you will see a QOL enhancement once these are implemented. Clearly you have much more 121 experience than I do, but I don't really see what that has to do with using iPads as EFBs. I've worked in a department that used them, therefore I have experience with how useful they are in the cockpit. It seems like a win-win for you and your company, but apparently you don't feel that way. Once this does go through (or I guess, if it does...), I would be interested to see how you feel about it after you've had some time to transition over. Anyway, I'm out...
wrxpilot is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 06:58 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Guppy Capt.
Posts: 1,887
Default

Originally Posted by wrxpilot View Post
A little under three years. It was a CJ3 with ProLine 21 (with charts displayed on the IFIS), and included the use of iPads. Though we implemented the iPads during the last year I was there, and I had about 12 months of using it as a backup for our charts and manuals. This was all part 91.
A little different than what is being talked about then. Classes and Types...
Short Bus Drive is offline  
Old 08-25-2011, 07:07 PM
  #40  
(retired)
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Posts: 422
Default

Originally Posted by wrxpilot View Post
...No offense was intended, and I'm sorry if you feel that way. But I really do think you will see a QOL enhancement once these are implemented...
I sense a degree of frustration so please, never, ever let a bulletin board lead you to think it might represent some sort of mainstream or majority opinion about any issue. They don't.

Taken in the context of a combined Continental/United pilot group of 11,000 or so pilots, one only has to look at the relatively low participation rate to understand that postings represent individual opinions only, and are not of a sufficient number or random nature to represent group opinion or to be statistically significant.

Me personally...I'm thrilled. I've worked and lived long enough to finally see what it's going to be like not to have to lug around 35 pounds of paper only to use five to seven small sheets for most flights. I'm generally in favor of most tech improvements whether aircraft or support equipment.

Just remember my opinion doesn't mean cXXp either on a bulletin board. At their best, they're good for disseminating information. At their worst, these things have a tendency to turn into sandbox fights on a pre-school playground.
Old UCAL CA is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MtnPeakCruiser
Technical
20
10-21-2012 06:09 AM
TonyWilliams
Hangar Talk
7
03-01-2011 01:04 AM
HSLD
Major
8
07-05-2010 05:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices