![]() |
Originally Posted by XHooker
(Post 1096855)
As Gordon Bethune once told me "we're drowning closer to the surface (than our competitors)." It was a bad time for everybody, you don't have to be faster than the bear... you just have to be faster than the slowest one running from the bear. That said, this merger will probably be a good thing for all of us in the long run.
|
Originally Posted by Shrek
(Post 1095718)
I am sure UAL pilots would gladly hand over their "profit sharing" check for the 20% difference in hourly pay that CAL enjoys.
"So I get assigned a 4-day trip worth 3:31 dh and 3:29 block with no guarantee listed. Of course I want to make sure that whatever the guarantee is, that it's properly reflected so that I'll be properly compensated. Scheduling told me it was a pay question and there's nothing they could do about it. So I called the union and was informed that our contract only provides pay guarantee for pairings with a layover greater than 29 hours - and since my longest layover between flights on this 4-day is just short of that, I was SOL! So there it is - another fine example of how our company takes advantage of our embarrassingly lax work rules!" One UAL rig is 5 hrs a day, right? So without the 20-hour rig you'll lose 65% of the time, but hey you'll get 20% more pay on the 7 hours you do fly with 4 days away from home. Heck of a deal. You have no idea what you're suggesting. Bonus round: if you call in sick, the DH doesn't pay in CAL's contract--you'll get 3:29 pay for a 4-day sick call. |
Originally Posted by CALPilotToo
(Post 1096249)
I guess you were one of the 58% ers in 2004 or an 83/85 hire.
|
For my UAL friends who thought that combining with Us Air would have caused us to go out of business, I've got some awesome Florida swampland for sale. I'll bet that the newly combined carrier, (UA/US), would have sunk to the bottom a lot quicker than a stand alone CAL but I digress.
Its all conjecture and quite frankly doesn't matter so once again, lets move on and face our real enemy. The management team you guys were having wet dreams about several years ago.:D |
Originally Posted by 757Driver
(Post 1097013)
For my UAL friends who thought that combining with Us Air would have caused us to go out of business, I've got some awesome Florida swampland for sale. I'll bet that the newly combined carrier, (UA/US), would have sunk to the bottom a lot quicker than a stand alone CAL but I digress.
Its all conjecture and quite frankly doesn't matter so once again, lets move on and face our real enemy. The management team you guys were having wet dreams about several years ago.:D |
Originally Posted by FACSofLife
(Post 1096823)
Here's some credibility from Jeff himself in an Aviation Week article that named him man of the year...
"Smisek is matter of fact about those days in April. “If US Airways had succeeded, our only merger partner would have disappeared. There was no other option,” says the man who now sits at the head of the combined United Continental. This argument was pivotal to his congressional testimony. While under attack for perceived anti-competitive tactics, Smisek held that the opposite was true: that his airline had no real growth opportunity and that without this merger Continental would eventually disappear." Don't forget also, the UAL MEC Chairman has a seat on the UAL BOD. While she(Wendy) cannot reveal the confidential information behind the deal, anyone who can read a basic annual report can see the numbers in black and white. Here's some highlights from the CAL 2009 annual report just prior to merger announcement in May 2010. "The severe global economic recession significantly diminished the demand for air travel beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 and disrupted the global capital markets, resulting in a difficult financial environment for U.S. network carriers. Although we have seen some indications that the airline industry may be experiencing the early stages of a recovery, we cannot predict how quickly or fully demand for air travel will recover, and continued weakness in such demand would hinder our ability to achieve and sustain profitability. Moreover, although access to the capital markets has improved over the past several months, as evidenced by our recent financing transactions, we cannot give any assurances that we will be able to obtain additional financing or otherwise access the capital markets in the future on acceptable terms (or at all). We must achieve and sustain profitability and/or access the capital markets to meet our significant long-term debt and capital lease obligations and future commitments for capital expenditures, including the acquisition of aircraft and related spare engines. Economic Conditions. The severe economic recession in the U.S. and global economies has had a significant negative impact on the demand for air carrier services beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008. Passenger revenue in 2009 for U.S. airlines, as reported by the Air Transport Association of America, declined 18% compared to 2008. The decline in demand for air travel in 2008 and 2009 disproportionately reduced the volume of high-yield traffic, as many business travelers either curtailed their travel or purchased lower yield economy tickets. Although recent improvements in corporate bookings and revenue trends suggest that the airline industry may be experiencing the early stages of a recovery, we cannot predict how quickly or fully demand for air travel will recover. If global economic conditions fail to improve or worsen, resulting in continuing demand weakness and reduced revenues, we may be unable to offset the reduced revenues fully through further cost and capacity reductions or other measures. In addition to its effect on demand for our services, the global economic recession severely disrupted the global capital markets, resulting in a diminished availability of financing and higher cost for financing that was obtainable. Although access to the capital markets has improved over the past several months, as evidenced by our recent financing transactions, if economic conditions again worsen or these markets experience further disruptions, we may be unable to obtain financing on acceptable terms (or at all) to refinance certain maturing debt we would normally expect to refinance and to satisfy future capital commitments." Every CAL annual report says the same BS. |
Originally Posted by dumbfounded
(Post 1097056)
I think you find most of the UAL guys agree that it's time to move on , but don't expect them to join your circle - the right-handed Kool-aid be will be hard to accept, but that left-handed action you expect will not be tolerated at all.
|
"Smisek held that the opposite was true: that his airline had no real growth opportunity and that without this merger Continental would eventually disappear."
I was looking for this the other day and couldn't find it, says a lot about career expectations. |
I was looking for this the other day and couldn't find it, says a lot about career expectations. I was in the 1/17/2000 class and will be in the 1/10 class. |
I expect to be sharing a cockpit with most of you so I suggest we STHU cause we are all in this together.
Like it or not. That is something we all can expect in our careers. WTH:mad: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:16 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands