![]() |
Originally Posted by beeker
(Post 1118666)
dexim has just about ruined this site for me. Everything he puts on here is a bore and is distracting us from unity and getting a real contract. Please everyone just move beyond him and let's get some real discussion going.
|
????????????????????
|
Originally Posted by dexim
(Post 1118655)
You do know that reference was towards Pierce? If I were you, I'd worry about the impact the Pierce trade of 767 grievance/PS is going to have on SLI. I understand the way the grievance was worded and Pierce surrendering it would likely have a negative impact on you guys. You should look at that! Don't worry about the "tin hats".
|
Originally Posted by SoCalGuy
(Post 1118668)
Let you in on a HUGE secret Dex....
The SLI is a "lil-ditty" that follows something called a JCBA. You may want to save your energy/focus on that....NOT attempting to police the 'other sides' perceived 'negative impacts' on it's OWN future SLI implications. However, we on the L-CAL side appreciate your concern on such the topic :rolleyes: Food for thought.....Without those 'four' ratified letters-JCBA, we will NOT be seeing anything by way of an SLI as the letter of the law presently stands. Horse before the cart "amigo(a)". I really care about what happens to you CAL guys - don't forget that! |
Originally Posted by liquid
(Post 1118690)
So Wendys video explaining why she was not running for re-election that was released months ago was about Jay Pierce? RIGHHHHHTTTT... how about the shooting of JFK? Pierce I assume. Your lack of ability to look in the mirror and hold your own LEC's responsible is truly astounding.
Wendy is doing fine - she had your boys number long before he acted. Hard to keep a thief from stealing. If you expect to go forward you need to accept responsibility. Look at the bright side, you have a bonus to buy yourself a new ROLEX. |
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1118255)
...I think I get it. Sorry it's been more complicated then Congress. Please include missing bulletin points.
1) Capt Morse had a path that would have leveraged the company into a JCBA 2) Pierce is a side dealing (explective) who boned all leverage to get a JCBA 3) Pierce did this because he has a dubious past THUS 1) Pierce was probably promised a management job by Abbott for getting Cal PS 2) Pierce will take this job in the near term TO PREVENT ABOVE 1) Pierce must be thrown out by Cal pilots some of whom are scabs but nevermind the majority of Cal pilots will never 'get it' unless Pierce is tossed 2) Pierce will hold no grudge against Cal pilot group for throwing him out after securing PS thus will not go to management out of spite 3) Pierce will learn lesson and fly the line for the rest of his career THUS Company will cave and Contract completed in short order As a UAL pilot, I'm not a fan of the method that Capt Pierce chose to obtain profit sharing for the CAL pilots (which I'm glad they get BTW). However, to suggest that Capt Morse had some path to a JCBA is the joke of the year. The reason we DON'T have a JCBA is because Capt Morse totally dorked up the handling of our involvement with the DOJ at the beginning of this merger. To suggest that if Capt Pierce had acquiesced to the UAL MEC's preferred method of dealing with profit sharing we would be on the doorstep of a new contract is WAY out in left field. We might have an extended TPA, but it's RIDICULOUS to think we'd have a JCBA. Come on.... |
Originally Posted by gettinbumped
(Post 1118884)
As a UAL pilot, I'm not a fan of the method that Capt Pierce chose to obtain profit sharing for the CAL pilots (which I'm glad they get BTW). However, to suggest that Capt Morse had some path to a JCBA is the joke of the year. The reason we DON'T have a JCBA is because Capt Morse totally dorked up the handling of our involvement with the DOJ at the beginning of this merger. To suggest that if Capt Pierce had acquiesced to the UAL MEC's preferred method of dealing with profit sharing we would be on the doorstep of a new contract is WAY out in left field. We might have an extended TPA, but it's RIDICULOUS to think we'd have a JCBA. Come on....
|
Originally Posted by dexim
(Post 1118895)
We don't have a JCBA because of Wendy is a stretch - Where was Pierce again?
|
Originally Posted by dexim
(Post 1118418)
Good to hear from you, again, I'm sorry I offended you boyfriend, LAT/LONG - No harm right? If you leave your address and phone number, I'll take it off my XMas card and contact lists.
|
Originally Posted by dexim
(Post 1118326)
Thanks - I'm surprised the company makes that database available for all to see - How about Phone# and addresses are they there?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:09 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands