New TPA
03-01-2012 | 07:10 AM
#51
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 15
From: 737 CAPT
Originally Posted by Once United
With the amended TPA, I think EWR will see a pull down of 737 flying as those planes move to DEN,ORD,LAX. In exchange EWR will see a massive move of 70 seat RJ's/UAL JFK 320's to replace them. Wouldn't be surprised to see most of the 320 from IAD,ORD go to IAH.
Bad thing will be "no paid moves" because of another side deal to get around pilots ratifcation from our MEC's. These guys are getting as bad as management.
Bad thing will be "no paid moves" because of another side deal to get around pilots ratifcation from our MEC's. These guys are getting as bad as management.
Originally Posted by Slammer
We ought to know soon, but what I got from manpower, CPO and the EWR rep, that most of the flying will come out of IAH..we'll see and as always believe it when you see it. 70 seaters are a SCOPE issue as well as slots in EWR, so don't see that at all.
03-01-2012 | 10:13 AM
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
With the creation of a ORD and DEN 737 base people have to come from somewhere. Only places I can think of are EWR and IAH.
03-01-2012 | 10:30 AM
#53
Recommend Retention
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Bigfoot
03-01-2012 | 11:05 AM
#54
(retired)
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
03-01-2012 | 11:41 AM
#56
Pilot Response
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
It probably needs repeating again...there are no reductions in any base...that means hiring.
Or 90 hour lines and lots of open time...
Probably both. In as much as it's going to brutal summer for us on reserve; unfortunately worse for the L-CAL folks, this IS a good thing. No Shrinkage (sic)
Or 90 hour lines and lots of open time...
Probably both. In as much as it's going to brutal summer for us on reserve; unfortunately worse for the L-CAL folks, this IS a good thing. No Shrinkage (sic)
03-01-2012 | 12:08 PM
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
It probably needs repeating again...there are no reductions in any base...that means hiring.
Or 90 hour lines and lots of open time...
Probably both. In as much as it's going to brutal summer for us on reserve; unfortunately worse for the L-CAL folks, this IS a good thing. No Shrinkage (sic)
Or 90 hour lines and lots of open time...
Probably both. In as much as it's going to brutal summer for us on reserve; unfortunately worse for the L-CAL folks, this IS a good thing. No Shrinkage (sic)
03-01-2012 | 04:15 PM
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
03-01-2012 | 04:53 PM
#60
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
IF L-CAL goes ALL the way through the L-UA Furlough List offering positions to the entire roster ("takers" and "bypassers") per the guidelines.....IF seats still need to be filled per staffing, and there's NO more 'takers' from L-UA, you can fully expect them (Abbott) to hire off the street. Questions?
Stating the obvious.....No one is holding a gun to anyone's head as far as accepting/declining the L-CAL Pilot Position. The L-CAL employment offers have NO bearing on the Furloughee's status at L-UA. Their choice to take it, or leave it as far as the L-CAL employment offer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
