Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Ipad Propaganda from Flight Ops >

Ipad Propaganda from Flight Ops

Search

Notices

Ipad Propaganda from Flight Ops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2012 | 03:58 PM
  #21  
(retired)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
I don't think anybody is getting their panties in a bunch so to speak. The
'I Pads by August' debacle is a fitting example of the cluster **** that is Fred's Flying Circus. Therefore anytime he and his underlings try to make themselves look world class I call them out for the pathetic Yes Men that they are. I think most agree that the poop shovels of merger integration by memo to both pilot groups is a much more fitting example of United Flight Ops showing 'dignity and respect'.
Sounds like "panties in a bunch"....
Reply
Old 04-10-2012 | 04:39 PM
  #22  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA
Sounds like "panties in a bunch"....
Yeah guess I should sit back and just be glad to work here like your generation of CAL pilots has always done so eloquently...
Reply
Old 04-12-2012 | 06:59 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: 737 Cap
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
I haven't seen any video, nor do I care to. I have used the iPad belonging to a check airman I flew with. It works just fine. Plus, I can look up stuff in manuals normally located at home. From what I'm told, its just a ebook reader. Your manuals will be put on it. Eventually, after an adjustment period, you won't need paper manuals. Plug in, battery, etc are not a problem because I rarely look something up anyway. Later on, iPads will be installed in the aircraft with Jepps on it. They will be mounted and have power. You will still carry the iPad reader for your manuals too. So, there will be four ipads minimum per aircraft. The test one had Jepps and it worked great; Enroute charts and all. I could care less about iPads, but the idea of dumping all manuals and Jepps someday will be worth it. One pound vs. 45 pounds. Easy choice. I'm not sure why people are getting their panties in a bunch about this?
You should watch the video. Just my opinion. Once again, it shows UCH succeeding and dare I say dominating in their own minds while the reality is that they're simply repeating the arrogant failures of the past. The device, at this point, is almost functionless. It is not doing anything to increase SA, safety or efficiency. They bought the cheapest version possible, and integrated it in the least effective and lowest cost way which has proven to be an abject failure of process in its entirety. Could it be functional at some point? Sure, but it isn't now. Not even close.

To paraphrase from another forum post, it takes a lot to make the iPad as completely useless as they've made it. Kudos to UCH.

FWIW, at UAl we don't carry manuals anymore, so this is actually a huge inconvenience. I have to make sure it is charged and up to date, yet UCH doesn't provide me a wireless connection at even one of our domiciles, and they most certainly don't pay me to charge it at home. They've removed most of the "useful" functions that I might use to make my life easier and take ownership of the device by eliminating the ability to upgrade the device through the app store. They have also made it quite clear that it is to be used only for UCH functions, so like the flight bag I used to carry, it will stay at work. Further, its functionality is exceptionally poor, and the implementation is worse. When required to carry one, it will go right back into my "secure" V file between trips. If stolen by the cleaning crew that vacuums the floors, I'll be happy to file a police report and get another from the office. I just hope that there is a charge plug withing reach of my V file so that it will be ready to deploy when I get to work.

I currently work for a company that has so completely devalued what I do for them, that I simply do the absolute minimum required. Just the way it is. Unfortunate, but they made that bed. I'm not alone. Not by a long shot.
Reply
Old 04-12-2012 | 07:09 AM
  #24  
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 6
From: 777
Default

To All:

UAL is now rolling out the iPads to all line pilots. They say, "PLAN ON 10-15 MINUTES TO COMPLETE THE ACTIVATION;"

I have this to say:
I won't pick one up on my time. Either pay me to come in and pick it up before a flight, or the flight will leave late based on time to do it.

IT and non-contract people decree something not in accordance witht the contract. Not for me.
Reply
Old 04-12-2012 | 08:10 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
To All:

UAL is now rolling out the iPads to all line pilots. They say, "PLAN ON 10-15 MINUTES TO COMPLETE THE ACTIVATION;"

I have this to say:
I won't pick one up on my time. Either pay me to come in and pick it up before a flight, or the flight will leave late based on time to do it.

IT and non-contract people decree something not in accordance witht the contract. Not for me.
+1

I don't know how UAL ALPA let this one slip by - Maybe because it's not required and people are doing it for free. Not Me!
Reply
Old 04-12-2012 | 08:18 AM
  #26  
UalHvy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Default

+2. Me either.
Reply
Old 04-12-2012 | 08:25 AM
  #27  
Gets Rolled on the Reg.
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Scott Stoops
I currently work for a company that has so completely devalued what I do for them, that I simply do the absolute minimum required. Just the way it is. Unfortunate, but they made that bed. I'm not alone. Not by a long shot.
Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
To All:
IT and non-contract people decree something not in accordance witht the contract. Not for me.
Bingo x 2

Summer of 2012, you can just feel the love.
Reply
Old 04-13-2012 | 01:11 PM
  #28  
APC225's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default Spy on you, "no criminal intent"

Robbins v. Lower Merion School District is a federal class action lawsuit, brought in February 2010 on behalf of students of two high schools in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania suburbs.[2] In October 2010, the school district agreed to pay $610,000 to settle the Robbins and parallel Hasan lawsuits against it.[1]
The suit alleged that, in what was dubbed the "WebcamGate" scandal, the schools secretly spied on the students while they were in the privacy of their homes.[3][4] School authorities surreptitiously and remotely activated webcams embedded in school-issued laptops the students were using at home.[5][6] After the suit was brought, the school district, of which the two high schools are part, revealed that it had secretly snapped more than 66,000 images.[7][8] The suit charged that in doing so the district infringed on its students' privacy rights.[5][9][10] A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction, ordering the school district to stop its secret webcam monitoring, and ordered the district to pay the plaintiffs' attorney fees.[11][12][13]

The lawsuit was filed after 15-year-old high school sophomore Blake Robbins was disciplined at school, for his behavior in his home.[5][13] The school's "evidence" that triggered his discipline was a photograph that the school had secretly taken of him in his bedroom, via the webcam in his school-issued laptop. Without telling its students, the schools remotely accessed their school-issued laptops to secretly snap pictures of students in their own homes, their chat logs, and records of the websites they visited. The school then transmitted the snapshots to servers at the school, where school authorities reviewed them and shared the snapshots with others.[14] In one widely published photo, the school had photographed Robbins in his bed.[15] The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), U.S. Attorney's Office, and Montgomery County District Attorney all initiated criminal investigations of the matter, which they combined and then closed because they did not find evidence "that would establish beyond a reasonable doubt that anyone involved had criminal intent". In addition, a U.S. Senate Judiciary subcommittee held hearings on the issues raised by the schools' secret surveillance, and Senator Arlen Specter introduced draft legislation in the Senate to protect against it in the future. Parents, media, and academicians criticized the schools, and the matter was cited as a cautionary example of how modern technology can be used to infringe on personal privacy.[16]
Reply
Old 04-13-2012 | 01:17 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Default

The bigg question is can you get Porn on it?????????????
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CrakPipeOvrheat
Regional
94
02-12-2012 08:14 PM
xfzz
Fractional
15
10-27-2009 05:37 PM
HSLD
Regional
12
06-02-2009 01:28 PM
bluejuice
Cargo
3
10-01-2008 07:32 PM
N618FT
Regional
34
11-19-2007 07:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices