any UAL pilot
11-15-2012, 03:52 AM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 168
any UAL pilot
Any LUAL pilot that votes for this TA, is voting to destroy the careers of the bottom 2000 guys on the seniority list.
We now consider the UAL MEC unethical trash for throwing us under the bus and caving to the CAL MEC.
Each LCAL pilot receives FULL longevity credit for ALL time on furlough. 1999-2001 hires at UAL receive none.
This is just plain SLI manipulation.
Vote no people. Do the right thing and BE a union.
We now consider the UAL MEC unethical trash for throwing us under the bus and caving to the CAL MEC.
Each LCAL pilot receives FULL longevity credit for ALL time on furlough. 1999-2001 hires at UAL receive none.
This is just plain SLI manipulation.
Vote no people. Do the right thing and BE a union.
11-15-2012, 04:18 AM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Originally Posted by 47dog
Any LUAL pilot that votes for this TA, is voting to destroy the careers of the bottom 2000 guys on the seniority list.
We now consider the UAL MEC unethical trash for throwing us under the bus and caving to the CAL MEC.
Each LCAL pilot receives FULL longevity credit for ALL time on furlough. 1999-2001 hires at UAL receive none.
This is just plain SLI manipulation.
Vote no people. Do the right thing and BE a union.
We now consider the UAL MEC unethical trash for throwing us under the bus and caving to the CAL MEC.
Each LCAL pilot receives FULL longevity credit for ALL time on furlough. 1999-2001 hires at UAL receive none.
This is just plain SLI manipulation.
Vote no people. Do the right thing and BE a union.
I will be voting no, not just for the above reasons but that is of course part of it.
I agree with the mec comments but there were 3 that voted against this the chicago fo rep and sea.
11-15-2012, 05:02 AM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Le Bus
Posts: 382
I'm still amazed at this blatent disregard of the seniority rights and longevity owed my fellow union members, by none other that our fellow union members.
There are a few of our brethren who stand to benefit from this travesty at our expense. In essence, taking from us what it rightfully ours. There's a word for that.
My no vote is the beginning. I will not forget.
There are a few of our brethren who stand to benefit from this travesty at our expense. In essence, taking from us what it rightfully ours. There's a word for that.
My no vote is the beginning. I will not forget.
11-15-2012, 05:13 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 840
Originally Posted by IAHB756
CAL had more no voters and a much larger percentage of no voters but it is the CALMEC that will be blamed for this of course. A SLI grab of course. Pay no attention to the twelve yes voters on the UAL side.....
11-15-2012, 06:53 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Le Bus
Posts: 382
Originally Posted by IAHB756
CAL had more no voters and a much larger percentage of no voters but it is the CALMEC that will be blamed for this of course. A SLI grab of course. Pay no attention to the twelve yes voters on the UAL side.....
An SLI grab....you sound proud of that.
11-15-2012, 07:34 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
11-15-2012, 07:40 AM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 138
Originally Posted by 47dog
Each LCAL pilot receives FULL longevity credit for ALL time on furlough. 1999-2001 hires at UAL receive none.
11-15-2012, 07:52 AM
#10
Line Holder
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 79
Here's my take: you're operating from the assumption that UAL ALPA actually wants us back! It's what they say, but their actions to date have certainly indicated otherwise. What good does it do them to get us back on property? A bunch of ****** on, ****ed off pilots who represent a pretty big voting block that will just make trouble in the future? It's probably better for them to just go get new hires who haven't been scorched (yet). I don't buy for one second the rhetoric that has flowed from every MEC chairman since 2001. If they wanted us back, we'd be back. This JCBA will effectively make it so unappealing to return that they will cut our numbers in half, probably more.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
