Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
For United, Big Problems at Biggest Airline >

For United, Big Problems at Biggest Airline

Search

Notices

For United, Big Problems at Biggest Airline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2012 | 05:51 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: 36N15
Default

Anyone who thought merging two huge airlines could be done seamlessly was kidding themselves.
Reply
Old 11-29-2012 | 06:28 AM
  #12  
APC225's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CousinEddie
Nothing says security and happiness like a great contract with a weak company....uh wait....I did that once.
"He added the airline was now intent on providing better operational performance and consistently good customer service."

Sometimes a great contract gets the employees to provide great customer service which can make a weak company a strong one.

When a weak company undermines its employees by low balling and ropeadoping their contracts it's a downward spiral.
Reply
Old 11-29-2012 | 06:31 AM
  #13  
Ottopilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,576
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by CousinEddie
You'll really like the Airbus if you describe 737/757 coach as roomy.
Yea, but I avoid them due to no inflight entertainment.
Reply
Old 11-29-2012 | 06:53 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
"He added the airline was now intent on providing better operational performance and consistently good customer service."

Sometimes a great contract gets the employees to provide great customer service which can make a weak company a strong one.

When a weak company undermines its employees by low balling and ropeadoping their contracts it's a downward spiral.
Yes apc a great contract would be a good start but the manner in which ual has treated it's employees over the years is hard to overcome. Hard to change the long term attitude, wish we could but I guess time wll tell.
Reply
Old 11-29-2012 | 07:05 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Talk about inane thread drift!

So you might hear the PTU barking for a minute after shutdown verses a better seat for 4 hours or so? I'll take the wider and significantly more comfortable seats any day over the guppy. And as far as sitting up front, its apples and watermelons. If I end up senior to you, I promise that I'll never bid any seat on a guppy for the rest of my career. You can have it.

What did you think about the article?

Sorry. Couldn't help myself. Planes. That's all smiesdick sees. Planes will fix our problem. If we vote yes on this TA, we prove his point that labor is not now nor shall ever be any kind of stumbling block for running a successful airline. We are nothing more than a cog that occasionally needs to be tightened or loosened and maybe given a squirt of oil.

DAL is going to continue to kick our collective butts.
You will never be senior to me.
Reply
Old 11-29-2012 | 07:37 AM
  #16  
APC225's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by syd111
Yes apc a great contract would be a good start but the manner in which ual has treated it's employees over the years is hard to overcome. Hard to change the long term attitude, wish we could but I guess time wll tell.
So true. The long-abused UAL employees appeared to look forward to new management. Maybe it was just "anyone but Tilton" but clearly there was some hope. Smisek had it completely within his control to capitalize on this hope, treat us with respect, make an honest offer, and instructed his team to move quickly on contracts.

Instead he began by saying we don't need labor for the merger, snobbishly relegated us to the back burner, and followed today's MBA model of slash and burn, Baghdad Bob the media and investors, and collect the millions.

And now he blames us! "He added the airline was now intent on providing better operational performance and consistently good customer service. “And there are people who don’t like that,” he said. “I understand that. What I want is those people to either change or leave.” "

It would be sad if failure had been inevitable but it's worse since it was absolutely not inevitable. A big event like a merger really is a chance to turn the tanker on a dime with respect to employee moral which translates to customer satisfaction. They chose not to.

Last edited by APC225; 11-29-2012 at 07:56 AM.
Reply
Old 11-29-2012 | 03:34 PM
  #17  
reCALcitrant's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Default

FUPM. Vote no.
Reply
Old 11-30-2012 | 05:33 PM
  #18  
EWRflyr's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 15
From: 737 CAPT
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
The 787 will save the airline!
HEY! Remember your required talking points training about the 787 and rephrase that:

"The game-changing 787 will save the airline."
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheFly
Technical
7
08-12-2012 07:54 AM
fireman0174
Major
6
07-25-2006 05:17 PM
fireman0174
Major
3
05-18-2006 02:19 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
3
05-16-2005 06:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices