Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
How Are We To Measure Ourselves as Pilots >

How Are We To Measure Ourselves as Pilots

Search
Notices

How Are We To Measure Ourselves as Pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2013, 09:32 AM
  #81  
Not retiring avatar
 
Monkeyfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: 777 CAP
Posts: 768
Wink Latest definitions of air superiority

150. Newness of aircraft.
151. Fuel efficiency of aircraft.
152. Range of aircraft.
153. Pounds of thrust of engines.
154. MTOW of aircraft.
155. Etops capability of aircraft.
156. Percentage of "International" flights.
157. How fast "firm orders" are arriving.
158. Being "hand picked" to F-15s and "indeed" one of the first to fly it.
159. Flat panel glass displays.
160. Trans-Atlantic capability of narrow-body aircraft.
161. Resale value of aircraft vs. cost of new aircraft.
162. Electric pumps and humidifiers for pressurization.
163. Use of ADS-B
164. Use of CPDLC
165. Capability of your iPhone vs. other guy's planes.
166. Eco-friendliness.
167. Proliferation of winglets, rakelets and other money saving wingtips.
Monkeyfly is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 11:08 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Baron50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Cub Cap
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by Boneman View Post
Maybe so, but a company can hold employees to a higher standard in the workplace and fire your young arse for non-compliance. I'm just saying...
Well, if you are referencing a "right to free speech" in the work place, you would be correct. You have a constitutional right to free speech, but you do not have a constitutional right to work for UAL. The code of conduct would allow management to fire someone who might tell his local newspaper that UAL was unsafe or in some other way damage the corporation’s reputation. This is not the issue.

As part of the 1985 back to work agreement, both parties agreed to a "no recrimination clause" in other words, we could not throw the scabs out of the union via Article VIII and management could not fire strikers for their past activities. However, this did not stop certain scabs from suing us for harassment and losing those cases in spectacular fashion. One of the unintended consequences of the scab's efforts was that a federal judge determined that calling a scab a scab was not harassment

Now, if the CAL management wants to be in violation of the back to work agreement and a federal judge, let them give it a go. ALPA is quite prepared to defend someone accused of harassment, and we have a very good record of wining those cases. It sounds like the CAL culture was to fear management, that has not been the case on the UAL side and I doubt that will change much in the future.

Not so young,

Baron
Baron50 is offline  
Old 04-22-2013, 06:32 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Baron,

Thx for the history lesson.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
TruthHurts
United
57
03-22-2012 10:03 AM
Jettubby
Mergers and Acquisitions
14
04-03-2008 06:56 AM
FDX aviator
Cargo
2
08-09-2007 11:00 AM
John Pennekamp
Major
28
02-13-2007 01:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices