UAL proposed list online
05-15-2013 | 01:30 PM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
I think the glaring difference is that it includes the UAL furloughees mixed in with active, non-furloughed CAL types. No use hashing it out on here as the arbitrators are the only ones who will have any say so.
For those of you who haven't figured it out yet, first CAL ALPA put on their best case and now UAL is doing the same. To postulate on this forum and get all upset at each other is probably the biggest waste of energy I've ever seen.
And now, back to the show !!!
For those of you who haven't figured it out yet, first CAL ALPA put on their best case and now UAL is doing the same. To postulate on this forum and get all upset at each other is probably the biggest waste of energy I've ever seen.
And now, back to the show !!!
05-15-2013 | 01:32 PM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
05-15-2013 | 01:33 PM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Like the UAL pilots refrained from demonizing the CAL pilots when our proposal was put out?
05-15-2013 | 01:37 PM
#14
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 0
One thing I've noticed is the massive clumps of UAL pilots with no CAL guys inserted. Why is that?
05-15-2013 | 01:38 PM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
05-15-2013 | 01:38 PM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: B767/757 Capt
Sigh, where do I begin?
The whole big fuss about longevity, and then the UAL side pretty much throws it out when it disadvantages them.
Pretty ballsy to lay claim to ALL the 350's, and most of our 787's.
Ignoring the career expectations of pilots who've been flying Captain for years.
Putting furloughed pilots ahead of active pilots.
The list is really too long and I'm sure lots of guys chiming in.
But, I'm not going to pretend to be outraged like most of the UAL guys pretended to be. I'm sure rational heads will prevail and we'll see something more sensible.
The whole big fuss about longevity, and then the UAL side pretty much throws it out when it disadvantages them.
Pretty ballsy to lay claim to ALL the 350's, and most of our 787's.
Ignoring the career expectations of pilots who've been flying Captain for years.
Putting furloughed pilots ahead of active pilots.
The list is really too long and I'm sure lots of guys chiming in.
But, I'm not going to pretend to be outraged like most of the UAL guys pretended to be. I'm sure rational heads will prevail and we'll see something more sensible.
You do understand that the PNCL/MESABA/COLGAN merger slotted furloughed pilots with active pilots?
Also it looks like the UAL Furloughed bubba's are the FIRST to get furloughed for the next 5 years after SLI....
Seems like everyone is pi$$ed at this list in some way....which makes me believe this is what the final draft will look like.
JMHO...
05-15-2013 | 01:40 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
05-15-2013 | 01:40 PM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: B767/757 Capt
I will lose 4958 numbers from my current CAL seniority on this list. How happy should I be? Should I be jumping for joy? I guess I'm missing something....................... One thing I've noticed is the massive clumps of UAL pilots with no CAL guys inserted. Why is that?
One thing I've noticed is the massive clumps of UAL pilots with no CAL guys inserted. Why is that?
05-15-2013 | 01:44 PM
#20
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 0
That's interesting..............some on here were calling us ALL scabs when the "proposal" came out. Oh, the short memories we seem to have.................
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
