Search

Notices

So long..........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2013 | 07:15 PM
  #41  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

I disagree. The UAL MC spent a lot of negotiating equity into trying to get furloughs integrated in with active pilots. To now complain that you did not get more? They put the rest of their ISL proposal at risk by doing this.

I commend the UAL MC's efforts in this, and the arb's decision.

Your lack of confidence in not being able to land another flying gig is not my fault, or my problem. My old squadron mates didn't seem to have this problem.
Reply
Old 09-05-2013 | 07:17 PM
  #42  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by aileronjam
Integrating some of the (2000 hires) furloughed UAL pilots BEHIND some of the furloughed CAL pilots is inexcusable.
Tell it to the Arbitrators. They made the decision.

You saw what happened when you ask for too much (ala CAL MC Proposal)
Reply
Old 09-05-2013 | 07:36 PM
  #43  
aileronjam's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 219
Likes: 5
From: It keeps changing.
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
I disagree. The UAL MC spent a lot of negotiating equity into trying to get furloughs integrated in with active pilots.
As they should have.

Originally Posted by Probe
To now complain that you did not get more?

They put the rest of their ISL proposal at risk by doing this.

I commend the UAL MC's efforts in this, and the arb's decision.
I never complained that "I" didn't get more... merely pointing out an inequity in the decision... as have many others on this forum.

I'm certain that the UAL MC and the "arb's" (sic) are gratified to no end that you commend them.

Originally Posted by Probe
Your lack of confidence in not being able to land another flying gig is not my fault, or my problem. My old squadron mates didn't seem to have this problem.
Nowhere did I indicate that it was intended to be "your problem"... you seem a little sensitive.

The point being made was that your flippant remarks about how easy it is finding other suitable employment was out of line. To think that it's as simple as that is an indication that you don't really have much of a clue. That's all... pretty simple really. Maybe you shouldn't take things so personally?
Reply
Old 09-05-2013 | 07:41 PM
  #44  
aileronjam's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 219
Likes: 5
From: It keeps changing.
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
Tell it to the Arbitrators. They made the decision.

You saw what happened when you ask for too much (ala CAL MC Proposal)
It's not too much to ask for them to follow the ALPA merger policy. The furloughed CAL pilots had less equity in EACH tenet of the merger policy, so how are they placed above UAL furloughees?

It's really a rhetorical question, I already know the answer. It's over and that's fine... it is what it is.
Reply
Old 09-05-2013 | 08:01 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Angry

Originally Posted by Probe
I empathize with the double furloughees, but at the same time, they have to accept responsibility for their choices, even if it was just bad luck.

If I were a 2000 or 2001 hire at UAL, and saw all our work rules go away in bankruptcy, I would have never looked back at UAL. We didn't outsource flying right away to RJ's, we outsourced flying to - ourselves. We flew the same number of flights with A LOT fewer pilots.

The more senior furloughees had a brighter outlook.

I have a half a dozen old squadron mates that were hired at UAL in 2000-2001. All are JB , Fedex, UPS, SWA, etc. None are ever coming back to UAL.

I think the arbs were wise in integrating some of the furloughs with active, but not all.

In the end, we take the cards we are dealt, and make our own choices. Choosing to come to UAL for the 3rd time?

I like to think I would have been a faster learner than that.

What I learned fast was that despite the best of choices is that there is always a group of pilots that will work cheaper and do management's VJM dirty work and aid mergers. Our 30 airplane parking turned into 94 overnight once Glenn found a CEO merger buddy that had just the group for the job. Save the conspiracy heckles...I lived it.
Glad you agree w the arbitrators...don't forget CAL MCwanted to staple ~1600 never furloughed! Oh yeah, bet we upgrade faster than your buds that bailed, but I won't then bust anyone's marbles for their hindsight choice! How come none of your squadron mates didnt bail to CAL? Maybe they weren't smart and charmed enough?
Maybe your buds should have chose a JV team back in 2000 to avoid getting caught up in a direct attack from extremist terrorists. If only we could have had your genius powers and chose wisely.
Reply
Old 09-05-2013 | 08:22 PM
  #46  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
Tell it to the Arbitrators. They made the decision.

You saw what happened when you ask for too much (ala CAL MC Proposal)
What exactly is "too much" in the case of the post you replied to? What compelled you to use your energy to reply with that kind of response? Does one usually get more by asking for less? Serious questions. Thanks in advance for your reply.
Reply
Old 09-05-2013 | 09:30 PM
  #47  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

I was a 95 hire. After 9/11, I took a leave of absence. Not to work, just for time away from the buffoonery that was going to be the industry.

I didn't seek work during this time. Before coming back, I should have applied to JB,SW,Fedex,UPS.

I chose poorly as well. I have to live with it also.

Then I took a VF in 08.
Came back 6 months ago as a u-hire.

Well, in hindsight, I was stupid, twice, as well.

LOL
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lori Clark
Hangar Talk
24
11-06-2025 07:25 PM
Colonel S
United
25
05-04-2022 03:46 AM
afterburn81
Regional
15
05-29-2008 03:26 PM
Whacker77
Regional
40
05-22-2008 03:36 PM
SkyyDesk
Hiring News
1
04-17-2007 02:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices