Bases and Seats...
#441
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
This logic doesn't make sense. So a military fighter guy spends a few years flying the 737 domestically and he's OK to get a 777 FO but an Air Force heavy pilot who was flying heavies internationally or a guy who came from a freight carrier can't do it as a new hire? I don't buy that you have to be here a while to figure it out when we put new hires on the 756 in EWR who immediately start flying the exact same routes.
Also isn't this why we have more than 1 pilot in the cockpit? No pilot should be doing anything themselves.
Also isn't this why we have more than 1 pilot in the cockpit? No pilot should be doing anything themselves.
Yes, no pilot should be doing the job by themselves. If you have a half winger with zero international experience in the cockpit when things go south quickly, the other guy will be single pilot.
#442
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: CAP A320
Posts: 300
It makes perfect sense. The opportunity has to be available to all the new hires whether they flew a KC135, a DC10 for a non sked, or the RJ fo who slid in the back door because they knew someone. You can't stroll through class and block some from a 777 slot while allowing others.
Yes, no pilot should be doing the job by themselves. If you have a half winger with zero international experience in the cockpit when things go south quickly, the other guy will be single pilot.
Yes, no pilot should be doing the job by themselves. If you have a half winger with zero international experience in the cockpit when things go south quickly, the other guy will be single pilot.
Last edited by fanaticalflyer; 07-20-2016 at 05:53 PM. Reason: grammatical errors
#443
So it comes down to the individual. But i think the odds of getting stuck with someone that is dead weight, on top of the odds of actually having an emergency are almost 'nil'. And in the event you have these unlike odds, I say the CAP needs to be able to take command of his crew and delegate like any good CAP should, especially if an FO isn't at 100% for whatever reason. Maybe you need to question your abilities as a Captain if you are so worried about being stuck single-piloted.
Any fleet, and base, this is always the risk with new guys. They just need experience. How do you get experience?
Settle down guys, this is the way it is, has been, and will be in the near future. There is a reason an ATP is qualified to teach ATP. We need to help each other out, not dump on them. Remember way back when, we were all new at one time or another.
In the early 90's, ALPA had an agreement with the company, no new hires into a wide body, this is after several NH's got rt seat in the DC-8 and didn't make it through training. Similar thing happened to the rt seat of the 400. They relaxed training freezes to make it happen. If this becomes an issue again, I expect we may see something similar again.
#444
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Absolute garbage you are spewing. You can even have an experienced international guy that can fold under pressure or be tired and you are "single pilot". A new-hire is just as capable of flying the airplane and handling ATC as any old fogie. So it comes down to the individual. But i think the odds of getting stuck with someone that is dead weight, on top of the odds of actually having an emergency are almost 'nil'. And in the event you have these unlike odds, I say the CAP needs to be able to take command of his crew and delegate like any good CAP should, especially if an FO isn't at 100% for whatever reason. Maybe you need to question your abilities as a Captain if you are so worried about being stuck single-piloted.
We can play the odds all you want and degenerate as you chose. I think safety dictates better if by chance a worst case scenario arises.
#445
Don't say Guppy
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Some new hires have lots of 121 experience and could easily go right to a wide body. Some not. It is hard to learn to be an airline pilot getting 1 leg every 3 months on reserve. Or less.
Since we are in a seniority based system, no one gets to choose who goes where so you have to dumb it down to the lowest common demoninator. It is better all new hires go to a smaller jet so they get some legs under their belt and learn to fly for United, even if some don't need it.
Since we are in a seniority based system, no one gets to choose who goes where so you have to dumb it down to the lowest common demoninator. It is better all new hires go to a smaller jet so they get some legs under their belt and learn to fly for United, even if some don't need it.
#446
UCH Pilot
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
Some new hires have lots of 121 experience and could easily go right to a wide body. Some not. It is hard to learn to be an airline pilot getting 1 leg every 3 months on reserve. Or less.
Since we are in a seniority based system, no one gets to choose who goes where so you have to dumb it down to the lowest common demoninator. It is better all new hires go to a smaller jet so they get some legs under their belt and learn to fly for United, even if some don't need it.
Since we are in a seniority based system, no one gets to choose who goes where so you have to dumb it down to the lowest common demoninator. It is better all new hires go to a smaller jet so they get some legs under their belt and learn to fly for United, even if some don't need it.
Maybe that policy was when United hired pilots with 350 hours, but not today that doesn't matter.
#447
Guppy reserve EWR
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 501
Some new hires have lots of 121 experience and could easily go right to a wide body. Some not. It is hard to learn to be an airline pilot getting 1 leg every 3 months on reserve. Or less.
Since we are in a seniority based system, no one gets to choose who goes where so you have to dumb it down to the lowest common demoninator. It is better all new hires go to a smaller jet so they get some legs under their belt and learn to fly for United, even if some don't need it.
Since we are in a seniority based system, no one gets to choose who goes where so you have to dumb it down to the lowest common demoninator. It is better all new hires go to a smaller jet so they get some legs under their belt and learn to fly for United, even if some don't need it.
As a high time, heavy jet, military Pilot, I know international flying well enough, but didn't have a clue about LNAV/VNAV, 10-7 pages, metering and ramp. Lots of things for this old dog to learn.
#448
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 854
If you drive by the school bus lot on a Sunday afternoon do you say, "Look at all the yellow bii!" or "Look at all the yellow busses!"?
We got an entire one day in the sim for international ops, including ETOPS, on the 737. At least on the 756 or 777 the new-hire would be flying with guys who do their international ops procedures regularly.
I'm not sure they will get it straight out of Indoc though. The course is not designed for that. Right now, the course is tailored toward people coming off other Boeings and with over water experience. If they want to put new hires in, I think the footprint of training would be 7 days longer.
#449
If you drive by the school bus lot on a Sunday afternoon do you say, "Look at all the yellow bii!" or "Look at all the yellow busses!"?
We got an entire one day in the sim for international ops, including ETOPS, on the 737. At least on the 756 or 777 the new-hire would be flying with guys who do their international ops procedures regularly.
We got an entire one day in the sim for international ops, including ETOPS, on the 737. At least on the 756 or 777 the new-hire would be flying with guys who do their international ops procedures regularly.
Can you explain why a 757 with the two FOs in the seat diverted to Gander because they thought they didn't have enough gas to make it back to Newark? (Why they chose not to wake up the captain is a different discussion).
#450
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
I respectfully disagree. I think we hire guys who already have a bunch of hours and our training is great. Plus everyone on the line helps everyone out. I think it's a non-issue. Everyone has "legs under their belt" from wherever they came from.
Maybe that policy was when United hired pilots with 350 hours, but not today that doesn't matter.
Maybe that policy was when United hired pilots with 350 hours, but not today that doesn't matter.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post