Search

Notices

Hawaii Turns

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2013 | 11:43 AM
  #11  
Lerxst's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: B787 CA - SFO
Default

The 59XX pairings are relief FO positions
Reply
Old 11-01-2013 | 05:27 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: A320/CAP
Default

So then I understand.... 737 in LAX will not fly Hawaii after JAN because the new flying rigs?
Reply
Old 11-01-2013 | 06:42 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HotPot
So then I understand.... 737 in LAX will not fly Hawaii after JAN because the new flying rigs?
Don't think that's true. What will stop is the 11 hour turns due to no rest seat. Guess more layovers in Hawaii.
Reply
Old 11-02-2013 | 09:11 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: A320/CAP
Default

I have not looked at the new rest/duty rigs. I flew the 757 from LAX to the islands for a year on the bankruptcy contract, and it just about killed me. 12 days off and 72 hours. But now we get a 5 hour look back. So, 15 hours makes for more time off or more money. Nice choice. I hope it stays that way.
Reply
Old 11-03-2013 | 04:25 AM
  #15  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

Some of the HI flying was so unproductive I used to cover the trips on reserve...from IAD. Guys would bid away from them in order to make some money flying elsewhere. Never understood how we allowed that rig to vaporize.
Reply
Old 11-03-2013 | 05:10 AM
  #16  
A320's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default

The guppy guys refer to Hawaii flying as doing a "crossing"
Reply
Old 11-03-2013 | 05:15 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

It is the longest open ocean segment in the world with no divert options.
Reply
Old 11-03-2013 | 05:57 AM
  #18  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

No. That is a long told myth. There is a large hole in the middle of the Pacific that you have to circumnavigate if you are only authorized 180 minute ETOPS. If you have 300+ minute ETOPS like some 330's and 777's, that hole shrinks down to near insignifigance. Unfortunately none of our 777's have that authorization. Hence the trouble our 777's have flying to SYD.

I believe the mid and south Atlantic has a similar hole. You can do it with 180 minute ETOPS, but you fly a longer and inefficient circuitous route.

The EWR girls call flying to Dublin a and Scotland a "crossing". SFO and LAX are longer from EWR. But hey, they are overwater and ETOPS. Thank god they are in a real airplane like a 757, if they were in a guppy they would be running the APU the whole time.

Flamesuit on. LOL
Reply
Old 11-04-2013 | 07:27 AM
  #19  
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 6
From: 777
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
No. That is a long told myth.
Sorry dude, west coast to HI is the longest ETOPS segment in the world, no options, no alternates. The only other region that I know that comes close is New Zealand to Antarctica, specifically McMurdo, and that is not flown commercially.

The Pacific, even in the remotest regions, has legions of small islands and atolls that have runways and work as emergency diverts. You are still dispatched ETOPS for these areas as they may not be suitable.

HI islands is still the design and certification point. The longer ETOPS rules only enable more efficient routings in the other regions of the Pacific--for that matter the Atlantic too.
Reply
Old 11-04-2013 | 02:38 PM
  #20  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

Sorry Dave, there is a huge whole in the central Pacific. You can avoid it and fly around it (wasting gas and time) and maintain 180 ETOPS, but you cannot fly through it. I believe there are few other places as well. You can fly a longer route, and maintain 180, but it costs you a lot of time and gas.

If 180 was the longest, why would Boeing and Airbus go to the trouble of certifying (and trying in the 787) their aircraft for 300+ minute ETOPS, if 180 was enough?

West Coast to Hawaii being the longest is a myth, and always has been. Nobody thought about the others before because those routes were exclusively flown by 747's.

I will do some research and post a link.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LUV FLYING
Major
23
11-03-2010 08:27 AM
vagabond
Major
26
06-06-2007 05:41 PM
Sir James
Major
2
06-15-2006 07:25 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
06-06-2005 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices