![]() |
Originally Posted by Snarge
(Post 1533733)
Or a display of 'civil disobedience'.... as long as its done collectively... and I'm not talking NorthFace
I totally get your frustration - I feel it too. |
So what's the deal, you have to wear either the leather jacket or the blazer, and only the hat with the blazer? So in the summer (when obviously no one would wear the leather) everyone has to wear the blazer with the hat?
|
Originally Posted by Really
(Post 1533713)
So you're telling me that the Navy would allow you to go to Wal-Mart and buy a pair of Khakis that may or may not match what they issue? And if you tell me that there isn't some Captain of a ship if he saw said Officer wouldn't read him the riot act, I'll just say I don't believe you!! And as far as different STYLE of uniforms, thats not what I was talking about- they were issued by the Company. Finally, if you don't think the Pax care about how you look I think you're living under a rock! ALL the group of my Friends/Business Men in my group (2 of them are 1K frequent flyers) talk about their flying experience!! What the plane looks like old or new, how the Crew looks both physically and dressed! Is this profiling, ABSOLUTELY! As far as the safety aspect, I along with you wish this drove more flying choices. Unfortunately, I don't think this crosses their mind that often otherwise, many Asian/African carriers would be out of business. They just look at the A/C, the crew and the food and see's how much it's going to cost them! They expect safety for FREE!;)
Plus they were much higher quality than the Wal-Mart uniforms we have now that I won't wear. Tie and epaulettes. That's it. |
Originally Posted by LivinTheDream28
(Post 1533936)
So what's the deal, you have to wear either the leather jacket or the blazer, and only the hat with the blazer? So in the summer (when obviously no one would wear the leather) everyone has to wear the blazer with the hat?
|
Are hats required?
|
Originally Posted by CanoePilot
(Post 1534015)
Are hats required?
|
Read pg 1-80 in the admin chapter and decide for yourself. It pretty clearly written.
|
I know, I know Hoss. I'm just extremely fed up with this place. Each id is a head scratcher. I'm thinking it really can't get any worse.
|
Curious how often I'll see CAL embroidered wings on shirts with pit stains cuz dude is too cheap.....
|
Originally Posted by Snarge
(Post 1534181)
Curious how often I'll see CAL embroidered wings on shirts with pit stains cuz dude is too cheap.....
|
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
(Post 1534186)
Cal doesn't have a monopoly on that market. You ever seen the dude who essentially lives in the basement at Dulles?
Oh yeah JB pilots have embroidered wings... another class act. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Snarge
(Post 1534206)
Do tell......
Oh yeah JB pilots have embroidered wings... another class act. :rolleyes: |
All this chitter chatter chitter chatter,
I think Snoop has a nice uniform, perhaps we ought to accessorize? http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/20...b__430x284.jpg |
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 1534253)
All this chitter chatter chitter chatter,
I think Snoop has a nice uniform, perhaps we ought to accessorize? http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/20...b__430x284.jpg "This is your soul plane chauffeur Captain Antoine Mack speaking. Welcome aboard NWA flight 069 from the 310 to the 212. Its time to bust this coney yall. In a hot second, Ill be hittin them switches and gettin this b**ch pumpin and jumpin. So screw your sh*t on tight and enjoy the flight." |
Originally Posted by Snarge
(Post 1534206)
Do tell......
Oh yeah JB pilots have embroidered wings... another class act. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1533685)
I agree. I think the double breasted suit was a way to force a non-sloppy look. It creates a professional consistency across the pilot group. For the pilots though it looks like it's more trouble and less comfortable. No worries. Leather jackets work fine.
NWA had a optional hat and leather jacket. The "offical" leather jacket was a really nice Gibson and Banres black jacket, with NO stupid patches for name tags or wings or anything else that makes you look like a twink. It looked like just a plain jacket, and the epaulettes velcroed on the tabs. It took about 5 seconds to go from work to street, and it was awesomely warm and could be wiped clean with a damp cloth. Folded up, it also make a tolerable pillow for that commute home. It did come with some pretty complex embroidery on the INSIDE (company logo on the back, and your name), so it was kind of unique. Of course, it was expensive (~$450) and no rule is so lax that it can't be abused and so the Indian knock-offs soon appeared, and they looked, IMHO, awful. Anyway, in comparison, the Delta double breasted thing takes two hands to button, so you have to put down whatever it is your carrying. Some guys did the "Velcro trick". Depending on the vendor it can be really hot, but worthless in the cold, if that's possible. For cold climates, you need an overcoat. The only good news is the "mandatory" jacket wear is actually a very small part of the year. Hats are mandatory year round, and you always have to wear your "flair" (wings & name tag), either on your jacket or shirt. FWIW, the company bought back all of the "official" leather jackets at the street price since we couldn't wear them any longer. Lots of people kept theirs. The guys with the knock offs were stuck with theirs. Nu |
Thanks for the background info.
|
12/12/13 Blastmail
"Due to the fact that some pilots have not received their new hats and the hat badge does not fit properly on some hats, the company has indicated that they will not enforce the hat policy until the vendor issues are resolved. Do not expect the company to put this in writing."
|
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1538625)
"Due to the fact that some pilots have not received their new hats and the hat badge does not fit properly on some hats, the company has indicated that they will not enforce the hat policy until the vendor issues are resolved. Do not expect the company to put this in writing."
|
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1538640)
How exactly do they expect to enforce this policy? If they are going to remove pilots from trips then about 65% of the pilots have already shown they aren't going to wear the hat. There are going to be a lot of canceled flights in 2014.
|
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1538652)
I think there're trying to find a way out of that bind and this is the start. Hats required but not enforced until April 15 at which point they're not FOM required at all until October 15 at which point they'll become FOM optional.
|
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1538665)
That would work. I know lots of guys that don't have hats yet.
What's a hat? |
Originally Posted by Slats Extend
(Post 1538680)
What's a hat?
|
As I heard a few years ago: "My hat?, I set it down on my pension and now I can't seem to find it, sorry"
|
Originally Posted by NFLUALNFL
(Post 1538722)
As I heard a few years ago: "My hat?, I set it down on my pension and now I can't seem to find it, sorry"
|
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1538688)
If you look at really old aviation photos they wore them on their heads when they were flying in the cockpit. They didn't consider themselves a "professional" unless they wore the hat while they flew.
Boy oh boy...how can we POSSIBLY act in a professional manner in a crew cockpit without our HATS?? How is it possible?? United could have saved MILLIONS by s*&%-canning hats (along with the chester-the-molester jackets) had they just had the courage to realize that the hats of yesterday are nearly DEAD in the United culture.... |
Ironic how some beat their chest following the contract to the letter, yet when a policy is the manual they pick and choose what they will follow. Seems like a double standard. Purely observation.
Discuss..... keyboard monkeys. |
Originally Posted by Slats Extend
(Post 1538723)
Ding Ding Ding! We have a winner.
Your pension isn't lost.....Glen has it. |
Originally Posted by Jaded N Cynical
(Post 1539001)
Ironic how some beat their chest following the contract to the letter, yet when a policy is the manual they pick and choose what they will follow. Seems like a double standard. Purely observation.
Discuss..... keyboard monkeys. Many, if not all, company policies are completely pragmatic and make perfect sense. A good example of this is the new, "Working Together Guidelines." :cool: |
Originally Posted by Jaded N Cynical
(Post 1539001)
Ironic how some beat their chest following the contract to the letter, yet when a policy is the manual they pick and choose what they will follow. Seems like a double standard. Purely observation..
Especially when this is a NEW policy because previously at United Airlines, a hat is not mandatory. It was at Continental, but that airline doesn't exist anymore since United bought it. |
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1539016)
Following safety procedures to the letter is not the same as wearing a hat.
Especially when this is a NEW policy because previously at United Airlines, a hat is not mandatory. It was at Continental, but that airline doesn't exist anymore since United bought it. |
Originally Posted by Skyflyin
(Post 1539056)
Well, the company you "bought" is now making you wear your hat again. HA :p
Nice try. |
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1539057)
No. Only if we wear the coat is the hat mandatory. I wear the leather jacket, which is not the coat, so no mandatory hat.
Nice try. |
Originally Posted by Slats Extend
(Post 1538680)
What's a hat?
|
Originally Posted by sleeves
(Post 1539316)
Good luck with that. I see a bulletin in the works.
Problem solved. |
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1539390)
FOM is very clear. No jacket = no hat. Leather jacket is substitute for coat.
Problem solved. |
Originally Posted by krudawg
(Post 1539370)
It's a cover for your brain-housing group, according to Chesty Puller
That was referred to as a "cover". |
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1539390)
FOM is very clear. No jacket = no hat. Leather jacket is substitute for coat.
Problem solved. |
Yea, they're sending a pretty strong message in Howard's weekly message by publishing a pic of 10 pilots at TK in the new uniform and not a one of them wearing the hat. Yep, we better all fall in line or else.....
|
Originally Posted by Gupboy
(Post 1539775)
This guy has obviously never heard of a little thing called a revision...the rumor going around is that mgt will specifically target the dudes in leather jackets. :eek:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:07 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands