Profit Sharing Grievance
01-28-2015 | 02:57 PM
#201
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
From: UAL retired
11 page grievance . . .
Summary which points to us getting nothing:
The Profit Sharing was supposed to be based on the results of UAL NOT the combined entity of UAL and CAL. Therefore the profits from the CAL side should not accrue to UAL pilots. Furthermore, UCH had no restrictions written or otherwise to sharing CAL's profit with CAL pilots.
Not my message, but I think the lawyers win this one again. . .
Summary which points to us getting nothing:
The Profit Sharing was supposed to be based on the results of UAL NOT the combined entity of UAL and CAL. Therefore the profits from the CAL side should not accrue to UAL pilots. Furthermore, UCH had no restrictions written or otherwise to sharing CAL's profit with CAL pilots.
Not my message, but I think the lawyers win this one again. . .
01-28-2015 | 03:02 PM
#202
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
11 page grievance . . .
Summary which points to us getting nothing:
The Profit Sharing was supposed to be based on the results of UAL NOT the combined entity of UAL and CAL. Therefore the profits from the CAL side should not accrue to UAL pilots. Furthermore, UCH had no restrictions written or otherwise to sharing CAL's profit with CAL pilots.
Not my message, but I think the lawyers win this one again. . .
Summary which points to us getting nothing:
The Profit Sharing was supposed to be based on the results of UAL NOT the combined entity of UAL and CAL. Therefore the profits from the CAL side should not accrue to UAL pilots. Furthermore, UCH had no restrictions written or otherwise to sharing CAL's profit with CAL pilots.
Not my message, but I think the lawyers win this one again. . .
01-28-2015 | 07:53 PM
#205
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain, retired
11 page grievance . . .
Summary which points to us getting nothing:
The Profit Sharing was supposed to be based on the results of UAL NOT the combined entity of UAL and CAL. Therefore the profits from the CAL side should not accrue to UAL pilots. Furthermore, UCH had no restrictions written or otherwise to sharing CAL's profit with CAL pilots.
Not my message, but I think the lawyers win this one again. . .
Summary which points to us getting nothing:
The Profit Sharing was supposed to be based on the results of UAL NOT the combined entity of UAL and CAL. Therefore the profits from the CAL side should not accrue to UAL pilots. Furthermore, UCH had no restrictions written or otherwise to sharing CAL's profit with CAL pilots.
Not my message, but I think the lawyers win this one again. . .
01-28-2015 | 07:57 PM
#206
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
In my 29 years at United Airlines there has never been a pay raise or bonus paid to pilots that was not contractual. This management, (CAL Management) apparently felt that since their pilots were part of the same workforce they deserved to share in the profit sharing. And in fact, paid them a profit sharing check without regard to whether they had a contract or not.
02-18-2015 | 12:26 AM
#208
Don't say Guppy
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
