Notices

It's about time

Old 04-26-2014, 09:27 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: 756 CAP
Posts: 74
Default It's about time

Wall Street is FINALLY waking up about our failed management:


At United Continental Holdings (NYSE: UAL ) , it's clear that the buck stops nowhere. Last week, the struggling U.S. legacy carrier reported a huge adjusted loss of $489 million for Q1. Meanwhile, its top competitors -- including Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL ) and American Airlines (NASDAQ: AAL ) -- each earned hundreds of millions of dollars.

United executives rolled out a new wave of excuses to explain away both the poor Q1 performance and weak guidance for Q2. To some extent, I'm sure they are right that overlapping systems from United and Continental, high growth by other carriers in Asia, and the pilot shortage at regional airlines are causing big headaches. However, at some point, the management team has to be held accountable for performance. United Continental is already two years past the biggest integration milestones, yet it continues to lose ground vis-a-vis every other major airline. It's time for the Board of Directors to step up and replace all of United's top executives and see if a new management team can do better.

Falling behind -- way behind
In early 2012, just over a year after the United-Continental merger closed, the integration process seemed to be in fairly good shape. United reported a solid $1.3 billion pre-tax profit for 2011, driven primarily by a 9.2% unit revenue increase: the best among the legacy carriers.

Since then, United's relative performance within the airline industry has declined rapidly. Last year, United's pre-tax adjusted profit totaled $1.1 billion: down about $200 million from 2011. In the same span of time, Delta Air Lines improved its pre-tax adjusted profit from $1.2 billion to a stunning $2.7 billion. Analysts now expect Delta to earn nearly $4 billion this year before taxes. Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.

United Airlines Needs to Clean House
By Adam Levine-Weinberg | More Articles | Save For Later
April 26, 2014 | Comments (0)

At United Continental Holdings (NYSE: UAL ) , it's clear that the buck stops nowhere. Last week, the struggling U.S. legacy carrier reported a huge adjusted loss of $489 million for Q1. Meanwhile, its top competitors -- including Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL ) and American Airlines (NASDAQ: AAL ) -- each earned hundreds of millions of dollars.

United executives rolled out a new wave of excuses to explain away both the poor Q1 performance and weak guidance for Q2. To some extent, I'm sure they are right that overlapping systems from United and Continental, high growth by other carriers in Asia, and the pilot shortage at regional airlines are causing big headaches.


United Airlines has come up with lots of excuses for its terrible performance.

However, at some point, the management team has to be held accountable for performance. United Continental is already two years past the biggest integration milestones, yet it continues to lose ground vis-a-vis every other major airline. It's time for the Board of Directors to step up and replace all of United's top executives and see if a new management team can do better.

Falling behind -- way behind
In early 2012, just over a year after the United-Continental merger closed, the integration process seemed to be in fairly good shape. United reported a solid $1.3 billion pre-tax profit for 2011, driven primarily by a 9.2% unit revenue increase: the best among the legacy carriers.

Since then, United's relative performance within the airline industry has declined rapidly. Last year, United's pre-tax adjusted profit totaled $1.1 billion: down about $200 million from 2011. In the same span of time, Delta Air Lines improved its pre-tax adjusted profit from $1.2 billion to a stunning $2.7 billion. Analysts now expect Delta to earn nearly $4 billion this year before taxes.


Delta Air Lines is on pace to post pre-tax earnings of nearly $4 billion this year.

American Airlines has also reported steady margin growth recently, and it improved its Q1 pre-tax margin by 3.6 percentage points. The company appears to be well-positioned for strong margin growth through the rest of 2014, too. American is projecting a 4%-6% increase in unit revenue for Q2.

Meanwhile, United is still floundering. The company's Q2 guidance calls for a meager 1%-3% unit revenue increase, with a large chunk of that gain attributable to the calendar shift of Easter from Q1 to Q2 this year. That would produce very modest profit improvement for United this quarter.

It's not getting better
As I have written previously, most airline analysts have been far too kind to United Continental in the past year or so. With the airline industry showing rapid profit growth, many analysts have assumed that United is bound to follow the rising tide. However, based on the combative tone of United's recent conference call, it appears that even formerly strident bulls are having second thoughts about United.

Most of the initiatives that United executives have raised as "fixes" for its unit revenue problems are very minor in nature. For example, United is optimizing its revenue management system, working to boost ancillary revenue, changing flight schedules in Houston and Denver, more actively matching aircraft size to demand, and cutting some flights in Tokyo.

However, United faces significant structural problems that will get worse -- not better -- as time goes on. First, United's hub in Newark is one of the company's crown jewels, but the recent Delta-Virgin Atlantic joint venture has left United as a distant third in the New York-London market: the most important international business travel market.


American Airlines is expanding in Asia, putting pressure on United. (Photo: American Airlines.)
Second, competitors like American and Delta are working to close the gap with United for Asia service. Both airlines are starting two new U.S.-Asia flights in June. Combined with the long-term growth trajectory of several Chinese airlines, this will keep up the pressure on United's transpacific routes.

Third, United's highly profitable transcontinental routes from JFK Airport in New York to Los Angeles and San Francisco are about to get a whole lot more competitive. All things considered, Q2 could very well be the easiest quarter of the year for United -- yet it will still post subpar results.

Time for some pink slips
The airline industry is a cyclical business, and it's pretty clear that we are approaching the high point of the cycle. Industry conditions are about as favorable today as they ever have been, yet United is still barely profitable, with a pre-tax margin of less than 3% for the last 12 months. In a year or two, the industry "tide" will probably start flowing the other way, dramatically ratcheting up the pressure on United's earnings.

Airline integrations are tough, and the United management team may have been dealt a bad hand in terms of other headwinds like route-specific competitive capacity increases.

However, the fact remains that United's management team isn't getting the job done. By now, United should be gaining ground on the rest of the industry in terms of margin performance. Instead, it is falling even further behind.

With several airlines having merged in the last few years, there are plenty of experienced airline executives who are out of the industry right now. It's time to give another group of leaders a chance to run United Airlines. It would be hard for them to do any worse than the current management team.
ReserveDog is offline  
Old 04-26-2014, 10:00 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flightmedic01's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Reclining
Posts: 840
Default It's about time

Couldn't agree more. I for one, am tired of the excuses.
flightmedic01 is offline  
Old 04-26-2014, 10:29 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 769
Default

Originally Posted by flightmedic01 View Post
Couldn't agree more. I for one, am tired of the excuses.
Didnt you just start at UAL? Tired of it already?
myoface is offline  
Old 04-26-2014, 10:47 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 839
Default

Originally Posted by myoface View Post
Didnt you just start at UAL? Tired of it already?
He caught on faster than Wall Street.
jdt30 is offline  
Old 04-26-2014, 10:48 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

That's a sobering article. I feel a "blame labor" period is inevitable. The tracking of individual captains' fuel efficiency is just the start.
APC225 is offline  
Old 04-26-2014, 10:57 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 424
Default

Originally Posted by myoface View Post
Didnt you just start at UAL? Tired of it already?
Nothing wrong with demanding accountability in my opinion.
mrmak2 is offline  
Old 04-26-2014, 11:48 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: 756 CAP
Posts: 74
Default

Originally Posted by APC225 View Post
That's a sobering article. I feel a "blame labor" period is inevitable. The tracking of individual captains' fuel efficiency is just the start.

There's no doubt at all that they will try to lay the blame on us and come to us for concessions. They have nothing to offer but excuses. Hopefully the Board wakes up. I, for one, will be giving them absolutely nothing.
ReserveDog is offline  
Old 04-26-2014, 06:51 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dicecal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: F-16
Posts: 201
Default

Bring back the pins! : Jeff's gotta go
Dicecal is offline  
Old 04-26-2014, 07:14 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flightmedic01's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Reclining
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by myoface View Post
Originally Posted by flightmedic01 View Post
Couldn't agree more. I for one, am tired of the excuses.
Didnt you just start at UAL? Tired of it already?
Haha, sure did. Maybe "tired" isn't the right phrase. Don't misunderstand though, I'm very happy to be here. But it's the same old excuses, just a different airline. Like a previous poster said, I believe that management just needs to be held accountable, just as I am held accountable for my actions and performance.
flightmedic01 is offline  
Old 04-27-2014, 09:03 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,080
Default

The writer of this article has been consistently beating the drum warning investors that UAL's financial outlook was poor for at least a year. An article that he wrote last summer really got me concerned that he might be right. Another one he wrote last fall convinced me that he was right and made a quick turn around seem doubtful. The assumption being made by investors was that UAL would get its act together, so the stock kept drifting higher. This writer looked at the data and correctly concluded that big problems were being overlooked or ignored. I posted the two previously mentioned articles on this forum and they were slammed in classic shoot the messenger style. Look at where we are now.
CousinEddie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RJ85FO
Regional
34
04-17-2017 04:16 PM
Squawk87
Aviation Law
23
09-24-2016 07:08 PM
CrakPipeOvrheat
Regional
94
02-12-2012 08:14 PM
Sniper
Aviation Law
13
11-15-2009 08:16 PM
CashMcL
Hangar Talk
9
09-14-2006 11:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices