Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Vacancy 15-03V (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/84288-vacancy-15-03v.html)

SpecialTracking 10-06-2014 05:03 AM


Originally Posted by SOTeric (Post 1740895)
And why not? Both pilots fly the same number of passengers on a given flight. Makes perfect sense!

Where would you peg the new rate under a pay for seniority scheme?

Al Czervik 10-06-2014 05:45 AM

Is a pilot out on medical leave eligible to bid on a vacancy?

SpecialTracking 10-06-2014 05:59 AM


Originally Posted by Al Czervik (Post 1740963)
Is a pilot out on medical leave eligible to bid on a vacancy?

Yes. According to sect 12-I-2, "The company shall allow access to ccs, or it's equivalent, to pilots on a leave of absence in order to allow them to...update their standing staffing bid, and input vacancy, displacement....bids."

SEDPA 10-06-2014 06:29 AM


Originally Posted by Airhoss (Post 1740931)
I don't know if you forgot the just kidding ;) icon or you are being serious here ... A single pay band pays all F/O's one rate solely based on longevity no matter what equipment they are on. Same for captains.

Not kidding ... why would this be bad?

SpecialTracking 10-06-2014 07:18 AM


Originally Posted by SEDPA (Post 1740983)
Not kidding ... why would this be bad?

Please tell which group will subsidize the pay increases for the NB pilots? It all sounds good until you have to produce answers in the face of a company that would laugh at the thought of $250/177 for all seats. Anything less and you are disenfranchising a large population of the pilot group.

Al Czervik 10-06-2014 07:53 AM


Originally Posted by SpecialTracking (Post 1740972)
Yes. According to sect 12-I-2, "The company shall allow access to ccs, or it's equivalent, to pilots on a leave of absence in order to allow them to...update their standing staffing bid, and input vacancy, displacement....bids."

Thanks!!!!

SEDPA 10-06-2014 08:27 AM


Originally Posted by SpecialTracking (Post 1740997)
Please tell which group will subsidize the pay increases for the NB pilots? It all sounds good until you have to produce answers in the face of a company that would laugh at the thought of $250/177 for all seats. Anything less and you are disenfranchising a large population of the pilot group.

I get that ... any change in the status quo means robbing Peter to pay Paul ... one could argue that had we not gone down this road of tying pay to size, err "productivity", then perhaps we all would be making more money .... so maybe the senior bubbas have been stealing from the less senior bubbas this whole time? As a UNION, we should be looking out for everyone, not just the senior ones. I'd much rather bid equipment for QOL rather than for $$$$.

pilot64golfer 10-06-2014 09:10 AM


Originally Posted by SEDPA (Post 1741028)
I get that ... any change in the status quo means robbing Peter to pay Paul ... one could argue that had we not gone down this road of tying pay to size, err "productivity", then perhaps we all would be making more money .... so maybe the senior bubbas have been stealing from the less senior bubbas this whole time? As a UNION, we should be looking out for everyone, not just the senior ones. I'd much rather bid equipment for QOL rather than for $$$$.

Its not that. Senior people have waited their turn. Now they want to be paid for the senior equipment, not just give it up so more junior pilots can make more money.

Its bad enough we had to subsidize guppy pay by downbanding 757 and subsidize 767-400 and 787 by downbanding 747 and 777.

oldmako 10-06-2014 09:17 AM

Instead of trying to reinvent the wheel, I submit that we'd ALL be better of by dusting off the old contracts of the 70's and 80's. Color me Troglodyte

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...lznL0zWj1jJHdQ

Probe 10-06-2014 11:55 AM


Originally Posted by pilot64golfer (Post 1741042)
Its not that. Senior people have waited their turn. Now they want to be paid for the senior equipment, not just give it up so more junior pilots can make more money.

Its bad enough we had to subsidize guppy pay by downbanding 757 and subsidize 767-400 and 787 by downbanding 747 and 777.

The lUAL side lost that side of the negotiations, but the lUAL pilots voted for the contract for different reasons. Time to move on.

If the tables were turned, the lCAL guys would have been torqued off.

It is over and done with.

FWIW I am glad Sparky gets the upper pay band. We should end up with a very large fleet of them eventually so I am happy that aircraft gets paid more than it otherwise should. We should all benefit from that decision one day.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands