Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Vacancy 15-03V (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/84288-vacancy-15-03v.html)

cadetdrivr 10-07-2014 09:23 AM


Originally Posted by worstpilotever (Post 1741270)
Does the snapshot take into account freezes? There many newhires going from bus to guppy or 75 to guppy. Is this accurate or will the final be adjusted?

The snapshot is "supposed" to be accurate.

However, per the UPA the company may waive any freeze it desires so it is certainly possible for new-hires (or anybody else) to be awarded something that on the surface appears unusual. It all just depends on where the company is projecting it wants pilots.

As always, the only thing that really counts is the final award.

rp2pilot 10-07-2014 09:37 AM


Originally Posted by Probe (Post 1741131)
The lUAL side lost that side of the negotiations, but the lUAL pilots voted for the contract for different reasons. Time to move on.

If the tables were turned, the lCAL guys would have been torqued off.

It is over and done with.

FWIW I am glad Sparky gets the upper pay band. We should end up with a very large fleet of them eventually so I am happy that aircraft gets paid more than it otherwise should. We should all benefit from that decision one day.

For now .. Pay bands appeared in one contract, they can disappear in the next. The company doesn't care one way or the other .. to them, it's a question of total cost that matters.

cadetdrivr 10-07-2014 09:45 AM


Originally Posted by rp2pilot (Post 1741757)
For now .. Pay bands appeared in one contract, they can disappear in the next. The company doesn't care one way or the other .. to them, it's a question of total cost that matters.

Pretty much---although the company does like bands to the extent that it theoretically decreases training expenses.

And if an aircraft "gets paid more than it otherwise should" that means the money is coming from someplace else.

tomgoodman 10-07-2014 11:20 AM


Originally Posted by Greg Bockelman (Post 1741590)
One COULD be on the road indefinitely. The 24 hours free from duty every 7 days can be anywhere. Doesn't have to be at the home domicile.

Pretty brutal schedule, regardless.

That sounds like Lewis & Clark's pre-departure briefing! :rolleyes:

Boulderian 10-07-2014 02:38 PM

Corrected snapshot is now posted showing the more realistic awards. ORD still going senior on most fleets with all vacancies taken. SFO going junior with new hires.

Unfilled vacancies only in EWR and IAH.

NJGov 10-07-2014 06:50 PM


Originally Posted by syd111 (Post 1741632)
The 777 flying out of ord this month has 10 day, also 6 day fra w and a 8 day gru w along with some other flying. Have been told that some of this will change as we mix metal,I only beleive it when I actually see it here. Could also change when they give away some more of our tags in asia.

The 10 day gets broken up regularly into 2 trips with dh attached.

We also lost pek this month to 400.



Change to get better or even worse?

And for someone on the outside, why does the trip get broken up? Something contractual I'm not seeing or is only in their good will to give more days at home?

TaylorB 10-07-2014 10:40 PM


Originally Posted by cadetdrivr (Post 1741750)
The snapshot is "supposed" to be accurate.

However, per the UPA the company may waive any freeze it desires so it is certainly possible for new-hires (or anybody else) to be awarded something that on the surface appears unusual. It all just depends on where the company is projecting it wants pilots.

As always, the only thing that really counts is the final award.

Where is that language in the UPA. I understand waiving freezes for new hire lateral moves (EWR 320 to SFO 737) and new hire from wide body to narrow body (EWR 756 to SFO 73/IAH320) ... But it seems they are not waiving the freeze for EWR 76t guys.

If they waive a freeze it should be for anyone to bid INTO a category. (If your seniority can hold it)
Not to waive a freeze in a current category and in turn, let a junior guy move to a base and category the senior guys wants and can certainly hold.

Any info is helpful! Thanks

CHAIRMAN 10-07-2014 10:52 PM


Originally Posted by TaylorB (Post 1742207)
Where is that language in the UPA. I understand waiving freezes for new hire lateral moves (EWR 320 to SFO 737) and new hire from wide body to narrow body (EWR 756 to SFO 73/IAH320) ... But it seems they are not waiving the freeze for EWR 76t guys.

If they waive a freeze it should be for anyone to bid INTO a category. (If your seniority can hold it)
Not to waive a freeze in a current category and in turn, let a junior guy move to a base and category the senior guys wants and can certainly hold.

Any info is helpful! Thanks

8-D-5 The Company, after consultation with the SSC, may waive any of the freezes outlined in Section 8-D for any specific vacancy bulletin.

Up to the company which freezes get waived. They can pick and choose to staff bases and equipment as they see fit.

Not agreeing just another vague part of the contract we were assured after 100 days of waiting that dotting the I's and crossing the T's missed.

baseball 10-08-2014 04:48 AM

I would bet no freezes will be waived if it would require a full course of training. No problem for the company to waive a 76T/756 freeze. That' just a two day event. The company views that as a win/win and likely a cost neutral item.

bottoms up 10-08-2014 05:27 AM

Speaking of 757/76T anyone have an idea if they completed retrofitting all the 767-300? I thought they started this back in 2012 sending them over to HKG for some work.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands