Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Bump Rights (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/84435-bump-rights.html)

jsled 10-16-2014 04:24 PM


Originally Posted by SEDPA (Post 1747791)
Uhh ... no. It's a result of what L-UAL brought to the table. The fruits of the merger that so many of you were (and still are) hungry for wasn't to be had until there was a JCBA ... during the time from OMD to effective date of the JCBA, UCH managed TWO separate pilot groups under TWO separate contracts ... the CAL contract grew pilots jobs, while the UAL contract didn't ... even if UCH wanted to grow the UAL side, the L-UAL contract DIDN'T ALLOW IT ... you can thank the MP change for the delay extracting your windfall and having to sleep in the bed you made (err living with the contract you brought to the table) ... Now back to the regularly scheduled humptity bumpity programming. ;)

Ual contract didn't allow growth? 737 flying in ORD, DEN, LAX was not allowed? C'mon man. The SFO MOU proved that growth could be shared. Where do you come up with this stuff? Now the Cap vacancies are being flooded with LUAL guys, and we are enjoying the reserve cushion the LCAL millennials are providing. Thank you.

SEDPA 10-16-2014 05:04 PM


Originally Posted by jsled (Post 1747801)
Ual contract didn't allow growth? 737 flying in ORD, DEN, LAX was not allowed? C'mon man. The SFO MOU proved that growth could be shared. Where do you come up with this stuff? Now the Cap vacancies are being flooded with LUAL guys, and we are enjoying the reserve cushion the LCAL millennials are providing. Thank you.

Yes, the L-UAL contract wouldn't allow LUAL pilots to be trained by LCAL pilots. There are a host of other reasons why the LCAL side gained jobs and the LUAL side didn't, but in the end, it was what each side brought to the table that determined who did the flying ... and just because it was 737s flying routes that LUAL side had flown at some time didn't make it your flying or flying that you had a claim to ... not until JCBA ... when exactly did that SFO MOU come out ??? (Hint ... what was the effective date of the UPA?) ... all part of the design of the MP change. And please stop hating ... or retire.

Pkcola 10-16-2014 05:10 PM


Originally Posted by SEDPA (Post 1747830)
Yes, the L-UAL contract wouldn't allow LUAL pilots to be trained by LCAL pilots. There are a host of other reasons why the LCAL side gained jobs and the LUAL side didn't, but in the end, it was what each side brought to the table that determined who did the flying ... and just because it was 737s flying routes that LUAL side had flown at some time didn't make it your flying or flying that you had a claim to ... not until JCBA ... when exactly did that SFO MOU come out ??? (Hint ... what was the effective date of the UPA?) ... all part of the design of the MP change. And please stop hating ... or retire.

Seems to more hate from your side - did losing cause that?

jsled 10-16-2014 06:01 PM


Originally Posted by SEDPA (Post 1747830)
Yes, the L-UAL contract wouldn't allow LUAL pilots to be trained by LCAL pilots. There are a host of other reasons why the LCAL side gained jobs and the LUAL side didn't, but in the end, it was what each side brought to the table that determined who did the flying ... and just because it was 737s flying routes that LUAL side had flown at some time didn't make it your flying or flying that you had a claim to ... not until JCBA ... when exactly did that SFO MOU come out ??? (Hint ... what was the effective date of the UPA?) ... all part of the design of the MP change. And please stop hating ... or retire.

Oh yeah. All those Cal Cap upgrades in Ual bases were fair and equitable. You betcha. But like I said, it's all good now...more reserve cushion for tha pushin baby. Oh yeah. Feels good. And I think I'll retire in a few decades, when I'm <300 on the list. But thanks for you're concern.

pilot64golfer 10-16-2014 06:44 PM


Originally Posted by SEDPA (Post 1747791)
UCH managed TWO separate pilot groups under TWO separate contracts ... the CAL contract grew pilots jobs

Only because it was a cheaper overall contract for the company because of the lack of work rules, which meant lower soft costs and less pilots needed.

Shrek 10-17-2014 09:15 AM

Are we really STILL talking about this ?! - LoL

Really 10-17-2014 10:07 AM


Originally Posted by Shrek (Post 1748138)
Are we really STILL talking about this ?! - LoL

Amazing isn't it!! :o It's the same people though, having a hard time getting over it!

sleeves 10-17-2014 11:26 AM


Originally Posted by jsled (Post 1747858)
Oh yeah. All those Cal Cap upgrades in Ual bases were fair and equitable. You betcha.

Yes they were. If they had not been I am sure your side would have won a grievance over it. Haters gonna hate I guess.

Free Flyer 10-17-2014 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by NFLUALNFL (Post 1745644)
With 250+ guppies currently plus the 100 growth guppies being delivered, you'd think they would have planned better.

Ha ha ha. Manpower planning. It should be called Manpower Mismanagement! Congrats to those who get their 4th stripe using this in our contract.

pilot64golfer 10-17-2014 12:37 PM


Originally Posted by Free Flyer (Post 1748246)
Ha ha ha. Manpower planning. It should be called Manpower Mismanagement! Congrats to those who get their 4th stripe using this in our contract.

Alot of these guys had their 4th stripe taken away a few years ago for pre-merger "rightsizing", so they know the drill. Some of these guys were Captains from 1999-2010, or many of those years.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:25 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands