Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
No pilots involved in interview process? >

No pilots involved in interview process?

Search
Notices

No pilots involved in interview process?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2015, 01:42 PM
  #61  
Klsytakesit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
I think HR has way too much influence in this process. You get points??? Yes, that's what I mean. I don't think we need to be hiring 2000 hour types when there are several other more well qualified candidates out there right now. Just my opinion, but a 2000 hour co-pilot at a commuter should probably not be getting the nod right now to come up to the majors, when you consider the depth of the applicants out there that have been humping it for a long time paying their dues.
Amen!!!!!!
 
Old 02-18-2015, 04:28 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,677
Default

Originally Posted by C-17 Driver View Post
I would be curious to see results of the Hogan test administered to pilots already on UAL property. How many of us would not fit HR's criteria?
Apparently, the test was given to a selected group/cross sectioin of UAL pilots before the hiring process began. Then the overall/general personality traits were garnered from that, making it the "measuring stick" so to speak going forward.

Originally Posted by horrido27 View Post
I've "heard" that some of the guys that have failed the Hogan Test are guys with good military backgrounds. Makes you wonder about that. And how many Commuter pilots have failed it yet continue to move "United" passengers on their Express flight?
As well as at DAL, they've had mil guys NOT get through the MMPI and/or psych eval on day 2. However, this hiring round the amount people they've let RETAKE the MMPI on day 2 is pretty high. Versus the past where if the MMPI was out of bounds, they'd get the TBNT/FOAD.

One key difference is that AT LEAST DAL will do the face to face interview with the pilot FIRST, before administering the psych stuff. In other words, they AT LEAST meet the pilot face to face as opposed to screening the pilot out over the interwebz.....

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
I don't think we need to be hiring 2000 hour types when there are several other more well qualified candidates out there right now. Just my opinion, but a 2000 hour co-pilot at a commuter should probably not be getting the nod right now to come up to the majors, when you consider the depth of the applicants out there that have been humping it for a long time paying their dues.
Sadly, in EVERY round of hiring they've ALWAYS been there. Not in large numbers at all, and actually a minority of the new hires in just about ANY airline's new hire class. However, THIS hiring round seems to see the MOST of them on average relatives to hiring waves past.

Donning my flame suit now...........

......although there's A LOT of great people in the 10,000+ applicant stack, I'd agree with your point. There are TONS of VERY experienced pilots NOT getting called. I run into many, I know many, and this board as well as others are full of them. For RIGHT HERE, and RIGHT NOW, there's PLENTY of guys with PIC/AC/LCA/IP/EP/STANDEVAL/NATOPS and whatever time that are ALSO saving kittens on their time off when their not attending job fairs, AND STILL NOT GETTING A CALL.
John Carr is offline  
Old 02-18-2015, 05:41 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr View Post


Sadly, in EVERY round of hiring they've ALWAYS been there. Not in large numbers at all, and actually a minority of the new hires in just about ANY airline's new hire class. However, THIS hiring round seems to see the MOST of them on average relatives to hiring waves past.

Well, I think I get what you're saying.... BUT, I am for less diversity, and more quality. I seem to be noticing that the standards get lower if someone can fit neatly into some sort of "category" or "class". Donning my flame suit as well, but I really don't care what color someone is, or if they are a damn (darn) yankee, or Puerto Rican, yada, yada, yada. But, I get a sense that people are getting a "leg up" on the competition if they are in a minority group or a perceived minority group. This profession, and frankly all professions need to garner "get what you earn" and "earn what you get" . I think it waters down the champagne for those that work really hard to get somewhere when some folks are given a leg up just because they fit into a neat little HR category on some silly HR form in some silly HR office filled out by some silly HR person, who went to some silly HR classes and who has no perspective on the profession other than what he learned from his/her HR associate professor. This is our profession, our career. The HR people come and go, they aren't married to this airline like we are. It's a pilot's profession first and last. As I said, my flame suit is donned and I wore insulated asbestos drawers.
baseball is offline  
Old 02-18-2015, 05:49 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,677
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
Well, I think I get what you're saying.... BUT, I am for less diversity, and more quality. I seem to be noticing that the standards get lower if someone can fit neatly into some sort of "category" or "class". Donning my flame suit as well, but I really don't care what color someone is, or if they are a damn (darn) yankee, or Puerto Rican, yada, yada, yada. But, I get a sense that people are getting a "leg up" on the competition if they are in a minority group or a perceived minority group. This profession, and frankly all professions need to garner "get what you earn" and "earn what you get" . I think it waters down the champagne for those that work really hard to get somewhere when some folks are given a leg up just because they fit into a neat little HR category on some silly HR form in some silly HR office filled out by some silly HR person, who went to some silly HR classes and who has no perspective on the profession other than what he learned from his/her HR associate professor. This is our profession, our career. The HR people come and go, they aren't married to this airline like we are. It's a pilot's profession first and last. As I said, my flame suit is donned and I wore insulated asbestos drawers.
I AGREED WITH YOU 100%.

I was simply saying, they've ALWAYS been there. And for people that may think like you and I, it's "always been that way, ALWAYS GONNA BE THAT WAY".

And the other part was simply observation, this hiring round seems to have more of the people lacking in flight experience than EVER. Yet they are still a pretty small group in amy new hire class.

That's all...............
John Carr is offline  
Old 02-18-2015, 07:45 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
duvie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: WB Bunkie
Posts: 1,246
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
but, I get a sense that people are getting a "leg up" on the competition if they are in a minority group or a perceived minority group.
How exactly do you think non-white, AKA minorities, are getting a leg up? It's an algorithm that pulls you out of the stack with no weight on anything else. The current UAL model is very sensitive to that.

People often don't discose the X-factor that may have got them hired. Ironically, (as evidenced by this thread) they want you to believe they deserved it. The race/gender card is lazy. Dig deeper and I'll bet you'll find an uncle in management or an internship under a now VP. Or, heaven forbid, a really well rounded resume ;-)
duvie is offline  
Old 02-19-2015, 07:30 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
BUT, I am for less diversity, and more quality.
From the Feb 3rd class..

1 Female - 7,000 TT with international experience
1 Black - 8,000 TT with 6,000 turbine PIC
1 South American - 11,000 TT

The remaining 18 were white males.

Quality didn't seem to be an issue.
Larry in TN is offline  
Old 02-19-2015, 05:59 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by duvie View Post
How exactly do you think non-white, AKA minorities, are getting a leg up? It's an algorithm that pulls you out of the stack with no weight on anything else. The current UAL model is very sensitive to that.

People often don't discose the X-factor that may have got them hired. Ironically, (as evidenced by this thread) they want you to believe they deserved it. The race/gender card is lazy. Dig deeper and I'll bet you'll find an uncle in management or an internship under a now VP. Or, heaven forbid, a really well rounded resume ;-)

Naaw, If I see a low time person with a well rounded resume I really feel good about that. I feel down right giddy if someone really did make it happen and did it all the right way. Just need the experience in my opinion. Youth is a good thing and I think it is great to get hired young on a major's seniority list. However, I see some strange stuff in some of the younger pilots and I wonder what the hell is HR thinking? If this were a pure pilot driven process no way do some of these folks make it through the door, much less the interview process.

I don't really look at Race (non white) at all. I don't look at females either. There are some other strange categories that I sort of scratch my head on that I never even knew were a consideration or a reason to lower the standards.

That's my beef. I don't think the standards should be lowered at all. I just think folks should work hard and pay their dues and all that HR crap should be left off the application. I think HR should go and play in the HR romper room and let the pilots run pilot land.
baseball is offline  
Old 02-19-2015, 06:00 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by Larry in TN View Post
From the Feb 3rd class..

1 Female - 7,000 TT with international experience
1 Black - 8,000 TT with 6,000 turbine PIC
1 South American - 11,000 TT

The remaining 18 were white males.

Quality didn't seem to be an issue.
That all sounds really good. Maybe things are looking up. I am assuming the 18 white males had good time/qualifications too.?
baseball is offline  
Old 02-19-2015, 07:12 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
That all sounds really good. Maybe things are looking up. I am assuming the 18 white males had good time/qualifications too.?
Most of them could quote all of the good lines from either Airplane or Top Gun, so ya they are highly qualified.
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 07:29 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by duvie View Post
How exactly do you think non-white, AKA minorities, are getting a leg up?

I get what u mean in the traditional sense of the word "minority." But, recently I've learned HR has other categories I wasn't aware of. I guess I am "behind in the times".
baseball is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
R57 relay
American
150
01-12-2015 07:02 PM
nwa757
American
178
01-10-2015 10:54 AM
P-3Bubba
Major
174
04-23-2014 06:14 AM
samballs
Regional
340
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices