Originally Posted by SpecialTracking (Post 1868626)

Yes but the company would try to minimize the 320 surpluses by not advertising a large 320 vacancy bid.

Originally Posted by UAL97 (Post 1868627)

Thank you! Guess there probably isn't much point in bidding the 320 IAH for a new hire then only to be displaced out of IAH right after IOE.

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking (Post 1868642)

That's not necessarily the case. Especially since the company is buying used Airbii and they are growing the 320 in Houston, there's a good chance you wouldn't be bumped. If that's what you want, bid it.

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking (Post 1868642)

That's not necessarily the case. Especially since the company is buying used Airbii and they are growing the 320 in Houston, there's a good chance you wouldn't be bumped. If that's what you want, bid it.

Originally Posted by Anchuskydrvr (Post 1868705)

What is the most jr iah 737 fo hire date?

Originally Posted by Harrier Dude (Post 1868817)

Fall of 2013.

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking (Post 1868619)

I don't think those -400 pilots enjoyed being displaced. I honestly don't have a number of how many-400 displacements there were, but how does that compare with the vacancies created by the growing 787 fleet.

Yes, scabs should never have a refuge.

Originally Posted by Harrier Dude (Post 1868817)

Fall of 2013.

Originally Posted by 24/48 (Post 1868967)

Oh, I'm not saying the -400 pilots enjoyed the bump, what I am saying is that by fencing the 787 all of the LUAL bumps had to look elsewhere. I think fences were a bad idea and driven by ego and emotion.

Originally Posted by Hilltopper89 (Post 1869047)

This and the same folks have been at the bottom since then.