![]() |
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 1983738)
It WAS a great gig. Now, not so much. I'll readily allow that it still beats hawking fruit or roofing, but adjusted for inflation, we are the biggest group of fraidy-cat blue collar *****s out there.
It sucked from 03-12. It is OK now. Almost good. 2013-2015. Looks like "sucked" is winning. I would be spectacularly happy simply making it back to "good". 20% pay raise, and 3-1 duty rig brings it back to "good", at least for me. |
Originally Posted by krudawg
(Post 1983549)
Ah here's a thought, the Economic Data for the United States is pointing towards some hard times ahead. Airline Management wants to avoid a "rich" contract with an economy that's slowing down.
Some of the things that sort of influenced this are: 1. 2 8 year democrat presidents (Clinton and Obama). 2. Age 65 3. 9/11 4. Flood of RJ's increasing capacity too much 5. High fuel costs The only thing that really makes me a bit nervous is all the occasional talk about age 70. The world economy may slow but joe six pack still wants to fly from Chicago to Orlando for 79 bucks. Regardless of the security environment, this gig is all about supply and demand. Supply and demand among the pilot ranks and supply and demand of the customers. This is the longest stretch of low fuel costs I can recall so that's good. The RJ's are decreasing in their dominance due to their poor economics, so that's good. ALPA doesn't appear to be pushing age 70 so that's good. Hopefully no big major US security event takes place and nothing bad since 9/11 sot that's positive. And, likely, we won't see a socialist democrat be elected and after the Obama abortion of a presidency likely no democrats elected for the rest of my lifetime. Yeah I know democrats are "labor friendly", but none of them would allow us to self help so it's a moot point. RLA limits what anyone can accomplish regardless of who is in the whitehouse. Put all that above in a cake and bake it and I think our negotiating environment and our overall position is favorable. |
Originally Posted by El10
(Post 1981076)
I will repeat myself again. A concessionary contract and a contract that does not provide enough gains are two totally different things.
|
Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA
(Post 1980630)
This industry has changed fundamentally over the last 35+ years. "Pattern Bargaining" (or "leapfrog" as we liked to call it) was a phenomenon that grew out of the regulated environment when there was less cost pressure to settle. The market forces are very different and very powerful today.
It isn't the industry in which your dad or grandfather flew...mine either. |
Originally Posted by Der Meister
(Post 1981054)
A call for repeal of the RLA from the airline labor groups? This is what Alpa Pac should be using some of that $ for.
|
Originally Posted by Scrappy
(Post 1984232)
Certainly no improvement on my part. Especially having to deal with some of the poor attitudes. But I certainly enjoy the job...just as I did prior to the merger.
|
Originally Posted by XHooker
(Post 1984466)
Considering the airlines are currently in an era of record profits and low fuel costs, I'd say that the "market forces" actually favor pattern bargaining.
Record profits are good for variable comp...bonuses, profit sharing, etc. Base compensation is largely driven by the supply and demand for class labor which hasn't changed except at the smaller, regional-type operations. There is a misconception that base comp gets driven by profitability. It doesn't. However, your variable comp component has a good chance of rising significantly. With an amendable date in 2017 and a likely settlement point somewhere in 2019, only time will tell. No skin in the game, but I'm hoping for good things between now and then. |
Originally Posted by baseball
(Post 1984460)
The economy has been slowing down for the last 20 plus years.
Some of the things that sort of influenced this are: 1. 2 8 year democrat presidents (Clinton and Obama). 2. Age 65 3. 9/11 4. Flood of RJ's increasing capacity too much 5. High fuel costs The only thing that really makes me a bit nervous is all the occasional talk about age 70. The world economy may slow but joe six pack still wants to fly from Chicago to Orlando for 79 bucks. Regardless of the security environment, this gig is all about supply and demand. Supply and demand among the pilot ranks and supply and demand of the customers. This is the longest stretch of low fuel costs I can recall so that's good. The RJ's are decreasing in their dominance due to their poor economics, so that's good. ALPA doesn't appear to be pushing age 70 so that's good. Hopefully no big major US security event takes place and nothing bad since 9/11 sot that's positive. And, likely, we won't see a socialist democrat be elected and after the Obama abortion of a presidency likely no democrats elected for the rest of my lifetime. Yeah I know democrats are "labor friendly", but none of them would allow us to self help so it's a moot point. RLA limits what anyone can accomplish regardless of who is in the whitehouse. Put all that above in a cake and bake it and I think our negotiating environment and our overall position is favorable. Wow. Surely you can't be serious. Best days of my career were during the Clinton admin. Obama's tenure has been a boon for this industry...not to mention your B-fund. Presidents do lots of things besides imposing PEBs. (which he did not do for Spirit, btw). By appointing Babbitt to FAA, and Pistole to TSA, we now have FAR 117 and Known Crewmember. Obama's legacy. Look at the carnage that occurred in this industry under Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II. Will we ever learn? :confused: Sled the reluctant Democrat |
Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA
(Post 1980290)
Allow me...I'll be very quick.
The industry with the final three "legacies" and Southwest, is consolidated and fiercely competitive. No surviving management group at any surviving company is going to bless a deal that would put them at a competitive disadvantage with their industry peer companies. With an approximate +20% domestic market share at each of the four survivors, it minimizes the leverage obtainable from the NMB in a Sec 6 negotiation...too much potential for too much disruption. The MEC's likely did the best they could under consolidated circumstances. There are a number of other issues related to your observation, but that's enough (no one reads this stuff anyways:)). I truly wish you the best in Sec 6. |
Originally Posted by Probe
(Post 1984429)
For me, it was a OK gig from 95-2000. Great 2000-2002.
It sucked from 03-12. It is OK now. Almost good. 2013-2015. Looks like "sucked" is winning. I would be spectacularly happy simply making it back to "good". 20% pay raise, and 3-1 duty rig brings it back to "good", at least for me. The paychecks were nice, but I would hardly call it a great time. The money made it harder to notice. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:20 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands