Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   The Current Negotiating Environment (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/90886-current-negotiating-environment.html)

Probe 10-02-2015 10:50 PM


Originally Posted by oldmako (Post 1983738)
It WAS a great gig. Now, not so much. I'll readily allow that it still beats hawking fruit or roofing, but adjusted for inflation, we are the biggest group of fraidy-cat blue collar *****s out there.

For me, it was a OK gig from 95-2000. Great 2000-2002.
It sucked from 03-12.
It is OK now. Almost good. 2013-2015.

Looks like "sucked" is winning. I would be spectacularly happy simply making it back to "good". 20% pay raise, and 3-1 duty rig brings it back to "good", at least for me.

baseball 10-03-2015 03:54 AM


Originally Posted by krudawg (Post 1983549)
Ah here's a thought, the Economic Data for the United States is pointing towards some hard times ahead. Airline Management wants to avoid a "rich" contract with an economy that's slowing down.

The economy has been slowing down for the last 20 plus years.

Some of the things that sort of influenced this are:

1. 2 8 year democrat presidents (Clinton and Obama).
2. Age 65
3. 9/11
4. Flood of RJ's increasing capacity too much
5. High fuel costs

The only thing that really makes me a bit nervous is all the occasional talk about age 70.

The world economy may slow but joe six pack still wants to fly from Chicago to Orlando for 79 bucks. Regardless of the security environment, this gig is all about supply and demand. Supply and demand among the pilot ranks and supply and demand of the customers.

This is the longest stretch of low fuel costs I can recall so that's good. The RJ's are decreasing in their dominance due to their poor economics, so that's good. ALPA doesn't appear to be pushing age 70 so that's good. Hopefully no big major US security event takes place and nothing bad since 9/11 sot that's positive. And, likely, we won't see a socialist democrat be elected and after the Obama abortion of a presidency likely no democrats elected for the rest of my lifetime. Yeah I know democrats are "labor friendly", but none of them would allow us to self help so it's a moot point. RLA limits what anyone can accomplish regardless of who is in the whitehouse.

Put all that above in a cake and bake it and I think our negotiating environment and our overall position is favorable.

XHooker 10-03-2015 04:10 AM


Originally Posted by El10 (Post 1981076)
I will repeat myself again. A concessionary contract and a contract that does not provide enough gains are two totally different things.

I heard when it was analyzed based on projected profits, inflation, work rule and scope changes, the DAL TA actually was concessionary. The DAL projected profits are large, but not large enough to trigger the higher profit sharing percentage threshold and thus the pilots actually make more by keeping the lower pay rates and higher profit sharing (lower threshold) of the current contract. Kind of a bird in the hand vs. two in the bush thing.

XHooker 10-03-2015 04:14 AM


Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA (Post 1980630)
This industry has changed fundamentally over the last 35+ years. "Pattern Bargaining" (or "leapfrog" as we liked to call it) was a phenomenon that grew out of the regulated environment when there was less cost pressure to settle. The market forces are very different and very powerful today.

It isn't the industry in which your dad or grandfather flew...mine either.

Considering the airlines are currently in an era of record profits and low fuel costs, I'd say that the "market forces" actually favor pattern bargaining.

XHooker 10-03-2015 04:19 AM


Originally Posted by Der Meister (Post 1981054)
A call for repeal of the RLA from the airline labor groups? This is what Alpa Pac should be using some of that $ for.

Be careful what you wish for. I can't recall hearing anyone from labor who really understands the RLA (I'm not in that group) advocate repealing it, and if you open it up to be amended, there are labor protections the industry would like to tear apart.

XHooker 10-03-2015 04:21 AM


Originally Posted by Scrappy (Post 1984232)
Certainly no improvement on my part. Especially having to deal with some of the poor attitudes. But I certainly enjoy the job...just as I did prior to the merger.

Don't Feed The Troll

Old UCAL CA 10-03-2015 05:49 AM


Originally Posted by XHooker (Post 1984466)
Considering the airlines are currently in an era of record profits and low fuel costs, I'd say that the "market forces" actually favor pattern bargaining.

Sort of...but only one component. Current market forces don't necessarily favor pattern bargaining on base components of pay.

Record profits are good for variable comp...bonuses, profit sharing, etc. Base compensation is largely driven by the supply and demand for class labor which hasn't changed except at the smaller, regional-type operations.

There is a misconception that base comp gets driven by profitability. It doesn't. However, your variable comp component has a good chance of rising significantly.

With an amendable date in 2017 and a likely settlement point somewhere in 2019, only time will tell. No skin in the game, but I'm hoping for good things between now and then.

jsled 10-03-2015 06:17 AM


Originally Posted by baseball (Post 1984460)
The economy has been slowing down for the last 20 plus years.

Some of the things that sort of influenced this are:

1. 2 8 year democrat presidents (Clinton and Obama).
2. Age 65
3. 9/11
4. Flood of RJ's increasing capacity too much
5. High fuel costs

The only thing that really makes me a bit nervous is all the occasional talk about age 70.

The world economy may slow but joe six pack still wants to fly from Chicago to Orlando for 79 bucks. Regardless of the security environment, this gig is all about supply and demand. Supply and demand among the pilot ranks and supply and demand of the customers.

This is the longest stretch of low fuel costs I can recall so that's good. The RJ's are decreasing in their dominance due to their poor economics, so that's good. ALPA doesn't appear to be pushing age 70 so that's good. Hopefully no big major US security event takes place and nothing bad since 9/11 sot that's positive. And, likely, we won't see a socialist democrat be elected and after the Obama abortion of a presidency likely no democrats elected for the rest of my lifetime. Yeah I know democrats are "labor friendly", but none of them would allow us to self help so it's a moot point. RLA limits what anyone can accomplish regardless of who is in the whitehouse.

Put all that above in a cake and bake it and I think our negotiating environment and our overall position is favorable.


Wow. Surely you can't be serious. Best days of my career were during the Clinton admin. Obama's tenure has been a boon for this industry...not to mention your B-fund. Presidents do lots of things besides imposing PEBs. (which he did not do for Spirit, btw). By appointing Babbitt to FAA, and Pistole to TSA, we now have FAR 117 and Known Crewmember. Obama's legacy.
Look at the carnage that occurred in this industry under Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II. Will we ever learn? :confused:

Sled the reluctant Democrat

Spoiler 10-03-2015 06:26 AM


Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA (Post 1980290)
Allow me...I'll be very quick.

The industry with the final three "legacies" and Southwest, is consolidated and fiercely competitive. No surviving management group at any surviving company is going to bless a deal that would put them at a competitive disadvantage with their industry peer companies. With an approximate +20% domestic market share at each of the four survivors, it minimizes the leverage obtainable from the NMB in a Sec 6 negotiation...too much potential for too much disruption. The MEC's likely did the best they could under consolidated circumstances.

There are a number of other issues related to your observation, but that's enough (no one reads this stuff anyways:)).

I truly wish you the best in Sec 6.

Did not seem to be a problem for UAW before.

CousinEddie 10-03-2015 06:30 AM


Originally Posted by Probe (Post 1984429)
For me, it was a OK gig from 95-2000. Great 2000-2002.
It sucked from 03-12.
It is OK now. Almost good. 2013-2015.

Looks like "sucked" is winning. I would be spectacularly happy simply making it back to "good". 20% pay raise, and 3-1 duty rig brings it back to "good", at least for me.

Great from 2000-2002? Well the big contract I guess. After the dust settled from that, the economy was obviously going south and UAL started losing piles of money. By the summer of 2001 I remember believing that furloughs were likely by winter. My last trip before 9-11 the Captain and I spent the better part of the flight from ATL-ORD discussing the fact that UAL was on track to lose over a billion dollars for 2001. That was without a black swan event like 9-11. Throw in all the uncertainty of the outrageously expensive bid for USair during part of that period and none of it felt right.

The paychecks were nice, but I would hardly call it a great time. The money made it harder to notice.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:20 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands