Coddling a traitor
10-02-2015 | 01:04 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: Airbus 320 Captain
10-02-2015 | 02:20 PM
#4
Banned
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Do you have the resolution or a copy of the application? Who's sponsoring the guy?
10-02-2015 | 03:10 PM
#5
Line Holder
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
Show up and voice your opinion - the leadership at the Houston LEC has always been suspect and you should let them know if this happens you'll work to make sure they don't get re-elected. It's not a cultural thing it's a leadership problem wanting to return to the ways of Fred and the deal making.
Do you have the resolution or a copy of the application? Who's sponsoring the guy?
Do you have the resolution or a copy of the application? Who's sponsoring the guy?
10-02-2015 | 03:10 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Show up and voice your opinion - the leadership at the Houston LEC has always been suspect and you should let them know if this happens you'll work to make sure they don't get re-elected. It's not a cultural thing it's a leadership problem wanting to return to the ways of Fred and the deal making.
Do you have the resolution or a copy of the application? Who's sponsoring the guy?
Do you have the resolution or a copy of the application? Who's sponsoring the guy?
10-02-2015 | 03:16 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
If you would browse the ALPA CB&L and the UAL MEC Policy Manual once in a while you would understand this is no C-171 conspiracy. The application is being considered per policy.There is no one sponsoring him because that is not required and it really has nothing to with the current LC leadership.
Furthermore none of the LEC are running for reelection so you don't even need to concern yourself with them for much longer.
There will be a vote on his membership at the 21 October LC meeting. The council even required the individual to attend that meeting per policy.
Dogg
Furthermore none of the LEC are running for reelection so you don't even need to concern yourself with them for much longer.
There will be a vote on his membership at the 21 October LC meeting. The council even required the individual to attend that meeting per policy.
Dogg
10-02-2015 | 03:43 PM
#9
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
If you would browse the ALPA CB&L and the UAL MEC Policy Manual once in a while you would understand this is no C-171 conspiracy. The application is being considered per policy.There is no one sponsoring him because that is not required and it really has nothing to with the current LC leadership.
Furthermore none of the LEC are running for reelection so you don't even need to concern yourself with them for much longer.
There will be a vote on his membership at the 21 October LC meeting. The council even required the individual to attend that meeting per policy.
Dogg
Furthermore none of the LEC are running for reelection so you don't even need to concern yourself with them for much longer.
There will be a vote on his membership at the 21 October LC meeting. The council even required the individual to attend that meeting per policy.
Dogg
10-02-2015 | 04:10 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
I understand Intrepid. But trust me with all the eyeballs on this one it will be handled correctly.
On another note as UALinIAH pointed out above we have entered a new low at C-171 with the current election. Check out the shenanigans at ualpilotsforum or the CALForum. Hopefully, this too shall pass after the election.
Dogg
On another note as UALinIAH pointed out above we have entered a new low at C-171 with the current election. Check out the shenanigans at ualpilotsforum or the CALForum. Hopefully, this too shall pass after the election.
Dogg
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
