![]() |
If he sold out any segment of this pilot group, he needs to be shown the door. I will reserve judgement until I see the facts though.
|
Originally Posted by untied
(Post 2014356)
No.
You don't give up all that experience for a deal that falls short. This is knee-jerk stupidity that gets posted after every failed deal. He's already spinning whatever it is by saying this is what you asked for and it's industry leading. Good or bad, they own this one. Sounds like what a BOD would say about a failing management team. We definitely can't get rid of them because they have the experience to get us out of this mess. |
Originally Posted by gettinbumped
(Post 2014339)
Disregard........
Oh well Wrong by supposedly a good source |
Originally Posted by Sniper66
(Post 2014375)
I was wrong
Oh well Wrong by supposedly a good source |
Originally Posted by gettinbumped
(Post 2014378)
No worries. Let's hope it's a good deal for all of us
|
Originally Posted by SteelerNation
(Post 2014362)
If he sold out any segment of this pilot group, he needs to be shown the door. I will reserve judgement until I see the facts though.
|
Our current reserve system sucks!
|
Originally Posted by Aviatorr
(Post 2014388)
Our current reserve system sucks!
|
Originally Posted by NFLUALNFL
(Post 2014385)
Who signed the current contract including LOA 25 and the reserve rules for L-UA?
|
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
(Post 2014369)
Experience that brought us the TPA and LOA 25?. Like I said, it fails, they should be shown the door.
He's already spinning whatever it is by saying this is what you asked for and it's industry leading. Good or bad, they own this one. Sounds like what a BOD would say about a failing management team. We definitely can't get rid of them because they have the experience to get us out of this mess. The current CBA is a substandard and was ratified by a very splintered group. A big chunk of them were holding their nose and voting merely to get the train on ONE track. (Look at the current FA mess) We can do much better now, as most of us seem to be on the same page, or at least reading the same game show script. They're flush and they need some help. Thats fine, but we shouldn't pay a cent for any of it. UA is on track to make a killing this year. For me, there better be better language and relief in many QOL areas for it to even pass the sniff test. How many items have we had to fight for while upholding the current agreement? How many grievances have we won, yet they still choose to ignore? How many PDR's and pay claims have been filed? How many absurd SC's have been handed out? I will read the entire thing and make my decision then. But I don't think that we need to rush anything. If we give them the relief they want now, our next contract will be pushed over the horizon. Meanwhile, we'll still have to deal with the crap imbued in this one. If we shoot this down (unless its a clear slam dunk), they will STILL need relief. We get 3% in 6 weeks and they will still have a bunch of game changers which they want to launch into orbit. They bought em, we didn't. They should have planned for this problem. They manage, we fly right? Jaundiced James. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:45 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands